Tom C wrote:
Now, if they can just avoid downgrading it more than twice and
concentrate
on being forward looking...
I can't figure out what you mean.
Godfrey
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
while we're having a love fest on the K10D
another leak ... in french (babelfish does a good translation)
http://www.macandphoto.com/2006/09/prise_en_main_d.html
I think I saw a couple of pigs flying south a few moments ago ... ;-)
Godfrey
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Wo-hoo! 12 RAW shots at 3 FPS. JPEG's at 3FPS: The card is the limit!
Tha'ts what I want!
Regards
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
+45 56 63 77 11
+45 23 43 85 77
Skype: jensbladt248
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af Shel
Belinkoff
Sendt:
I certainly can't disagree with that. But you gotta admit that
there's nothing (well, very few things) cooler than engaging the power
zoom, racking the lens all the way out, focusing on something close,
and then shutting the camera off just to watch the lens retract.
g
--
Scott
On 9/14/06 12:51 AM, P. J. Alling, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since they claim and extra stop in SR over the K100D maybe that's where
the extra stop is coming from.
According to a Japanese article, extra stop comes from more robust
magnet/coil over K100D's and the improved SR algorithm.
Ken
Sure you can. RAW+JPEG, with the RAW option set to DNG (not to PEF).
On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 10:31:39PM -0700, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Doesn't look like you can shoot DNG + JPEG though ... or did I miss that?
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Adam Maas
Maybe I'm being dense, but
On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 08:27:01PM -0400, Mark Roberts wrote:
Mark Roberts wrote:
Now this is interesting...
Look at this official pentax page, http://www.pentaxslr.com/bodies/k10
and you'll find these words: Power zoom function not available
Now scroll down to the bottom of the same
--- Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
while we're having a love fest on the K10D
another leak ... in french (babelfish does a good
translation)
http://www.macandphoto.com/2006/09/prise_en_main_d.html
I think I saw a couple of pigs flying south a few
moments ago ... ;-)
Nor can Tom. Pentax have just produced the most exciting camera for years
(from any manufacturer), and Tom is struggling to find something negative
to say.
But he'll be back on form soon enough, I'm sure.
And in due course he'll buy one, and then won't stop telling people how
good Pentax
On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 06:12:53PM -0700, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Sep 13, 2006, at 5:27 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Look at this official pentax page, http://www.pentaxslr.com/bodies/
k10
and you'll find these words: Power zoom function not available
Now scroll down to the bottom of
On Sep 14, 2006, at 1:25 AM, Jack Davis wrote:
David,
I see no real need for cropping. If anything, I might try
tightening it
into a square, just to take a look.
Think I'd clone/darken lower left corner and, maybe, lighten the buds.
They really don't contribute to the image.
BTW, I like
On Sep 13, 2006, at 11:27 PM, Jan van Wijk wrote:
I thought about cropping a bit off the left due to the bright
bits but
I was in too much of a hurry to decide exactly how much to crop.
Upto where the green vertical 'band' is ?
(crop off about 15% or so)
Yeah something like that. Just
On 13/9/06, Adam Maas, discombobulated, unleashed:
While I generally agree, I found the Pentax DSLR's to produce very
film-like results at high ISO's. The Canon and Nikon's are more
objectionable (Although my D50 is extremely clean at 800).
And for those who don't find it objectionable:
On 14/9/06, John Forbes, discombobulated, unleashed:
Nor can Tom. Pentax have just produced the most exciting camera for years
(from any manufacturer), and Tom is struggling to find something negative
to say.
But he'll be back on form soon enough, I'm sure.
And in due course he'll buy one,
Shel, I have a feeling that a firmware upgrade may have helped, with the
early versions of the D at least. Soon after getting the camera I took some
shots in available dark at 3200 which turned out very noisy - not unusable
but definitely not what I wanted! The next day, having forgotten that
I quit like that don't find it objectionable at all.
Sometimes I forget how good a snapper you are.
:-)
Dave
At 03:18 PM 14/09/2006, you wrote:
On 13/9/06, Adam Maas, discombobulated, unleashed:
While I generally agree, I found the Pentax DSLR's to produce very
film-like results at high
Nice shot Paul!
On Wed, 13 Sep 2006 21:30:47 -0400, Paul Stenquist wrote:
In a rather dark corner of a restaurant. DA 12/24, f6.7 @ 1 second,
ISO 400. Camera resting on the table.
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=4936130size=lg
Like the lighting, very natural ...
The motion blurr
From: Digital Image Studio [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/09/14 Thu AM 12:06:19 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: popphoto.com k10D
On 14/09/06, Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now, if they can just avoid downgrading it more than twice and concentrate
on being
Ivan,
Just remember that 645 will give you stop-down metering on K-mount...:-)
I believe most of the 645 lenses are excellent performers on digital.
I have used *istD with the A*-300/4, and like it very much. I have
also used the A*-300/4 extensively with the FA-75/2.8 reversed, for
extreme
On 14/09/06, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
while we're having a love fest on the K10D
another leak ... in french (babelfish does a good translation)
http://www.macandphoto.com/2006/09/prise_en_main_d.html
I think I saw a couple of pigs flying south a few moments ago ... ;-)
On Thu, 14 Sep 2006, Patrick Genovese wrote:
Check out Phil's preview on this page at the very bottom:
http://www.dpreview.com/articles/pentaxk10d/page9.asp
There is a setting :
Using aperture ring
1: Prohibited
2: Permitted
Does this mean we can use the aperture ring in the
I think push processing is a very good analogy. You can't strictly
speaking change the ISO on a digital camera - the sensor has a fixed
sensitivity. ...
... at a specified voltage input/output level. If you change the
voltage levels, you are changing the response curve and thus the
Check out Phil's preview on this page at the very bottom:
http://www.dpreview.com/articles/pentaxk10d/page9.asp
There is a setting :
Using aperture ring
1: Prohibited
2: Permitted
Does this mean we can use the aperture ring in the traditional way ?
i.e. that Pentax have brought back the
On Thu, 14 Sep 2006, mike wilson wrote:
From: Digital Image Studio [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/09/14 Thu AM 12:06:19 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: popphoto.com k10D
On 14/09/06, Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now, if they can just avoid downgrading it more
On 14/9/06, David Savage, discombobulated, unleashed:
Sometimes I forget how good a snapper you are.
You can simulate my aperture any time you like.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
From: Patrick Genovese [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/09/14 Thu AM 09:31:39 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: K10D and Lenses with Aperture Ring
Check out Phil's preview on this page at the very bottom:
http://www.dpreview.com/articles/pentaxk10d/page9.asp
There
ryan brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For fun, I added it to my cart and got a much earlier delivery date.
Such as?
Ralf
--
Ralf R. Radermacher - DL9KCG - Köln/Cologne, Germany
private homepage: http://www.fotoralf.de
manual cameras and photo galleries - updated Jan. 10, 2005
Contarex -
The temptation.
But I wouldn't do that.
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 14/9/06, David Savage, discombobulated, unleashed:
Sometimes I forget how good a slapper you are.
You can stimulate my aperture any time you like.
-
Email sent
On 9/14/06, mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The temptation.
But I wouldn't do that.
Since when?
Go for it ;-)
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 14/9/06, David Savage, discombobulated, unleashed:
Sometimes I forget how good a slapper you are.
You can stimulate my
:-(
On 9/14/06, mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Patrick Genovese [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/09/14 Thu AM 09:31:39 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: K10D and Lenses with Aperture Ring
Check out Phil's preview on this page at the very bottom:
On 9/14/06, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 14/9/06, David Savage, discombobulated, unleashed:
Sometimes I forget how good a snapper you are.
You can simulate my aperture any time you like.
Good thing I just finished my drink...
Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
It's excellent. The Pentax only gets noisy when the image is
underexposed at high ISO. I think users frequently try for 1600 when
they really need 3200, hence the reputation for noise. But I too have
found that my *istD is remarkably free of noise at high ISO. I expect
even better performance
I still don't know what an aperture simulator is, but the earlier D-series
cameras had the same menu setting, and many of us have been using lenses
with aperture rings all along.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Patrick Genovese
http://www.dpreview.com/articles/pentaxk10d/page9.asp
There
Yes, but some of the press release material has specifically mentioned
the green button. In general, the layout of this camera is closer to
that of the D than to the DL or DS.
On Sep 14, 2006, at 12:31 AM, Subash Jeyan wrote:
thanks davedidn't some of the other cameras use the ae-l button
That's why I sold mine several weeks ago.
Paul
On Sep 14, 2006, at 1:48 AM, Thibouille wrote:
The *ist D is officially for sale...
CW
Oh yours as well? They'll get difficult to sell IMO ^^
Thibault Massart aka Thibouille
--
*ist-D,Z1,SuperA,KX,MX, P30t and KR-10x ;)
In the midst of everyone's positive reaction, Tom is desperately
grasping for something negative. :-)
On Sep 14, 2006, at 1:55 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Tom C wrote:
Now, if they can just avoid downgrading it more than twice and
concentrate
on being forward looking...
I can't figure out
No, he'll buy one and then complain endlessly about some imagined
shortcoming.:-). But that's what makes life on the PDML so
entertaining.
Paul
On Sep 14, 2006, at 2:57 AM, John Forbes wrote:
Nor can Tom. Pentax have just produced the most exciting camera for
years
(from any manufacturer),
No.
On Sep 14, 2006, at 5:31 AM, Patrick Genovese wrote:
Check out Phil's preview on this page at the very bottom:
http://www.dpreview.com/articles/pentaxk10d/page9.asp
There is a setting :
Using aperture ring
1: Prohibited
2: Permitted
Does this mean we can use the aperture ring
Thanks Jan.
On Sep 14, 2006, at 4:47 AM, Jan van Wijk wrote:
Nice shot Paul!
On Wed, 13 Sep 2006 21:30:47 -0400, Paul Stenquist wrote:
In a rather dark corner of a restaurant. DA 12/24, f6.7 @ 1 second,
ISO 400. Camera resting on the table.
If you check the EXIF info, you'll see that the exposure was +0.70 I'm
sure that, had I been shooting more to the left the noise would have been
quite bad. I've had good results in many situations @ 1600 and 3200, but,
as Godders mentioned in another message here, underexposure will make the
From: Kostas Kavoussanakis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/09/14 Thu AM 09:47:00 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: popphoto.com k10D
On Thu, 14 Sep 2006, mike wilson wrote:
From: Digital Image Studio [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/09/14 Thu AM 12:06:19 GMT
After stating that I don't like the noise you get with higher ISOs, I ended
up shooting a few shots at ISO 800 this afternoon. I'm thrilled that I got
a bee in flight with the manual focus macro.
Anyway, I've done what I can with this noise wise. I'm really pleased with
the capture, but not
Hi folks,
I am thinking about buying a 'normal' prime lens for my istD. One obvious
choice might be the much praised FA 31/1.8. It's quite expensive however. I
have the chance to one of those old K 30/2.8-lenses for a good price, but
... Is the FA 31 worth saving and waiting for?
--
PDML
Have a look here Shel:
http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/Misc/Misc_014.html
The circled lever is the aperture simulator on my LX. This is how the
body knows what the lens aperture is set to. The lever and the
associated electronics are what is missing from all the DSLR's is
why we have the green
Op Thu, 14 Sep 2006 12:23:48 +0200 schreef Shel Belinkoff
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I still don't know what an aperture simulator is,
With pre-A lenses, the lens determines how much it is stopped down. In
order to measure exposure wide open, the body must know how much the lens
will stop down
OK, thanks. I think someone explained this before, but I didn't get it.
Now I understand.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Lucas Rijnders
schreef Shel Belinkoff
I still don't know what an aperture simulator is,
With pre-A lenses, the lens determines how much it is stopped down. In
Peter Smekal wrote:
Hi folks,
I am thinking about buying a 'normal' prime lens for my istD. One obvious
choice might be the much praised FA 31/1.8. It's quite expensive however. I
have the chance to one of those old K 30/2.8-lenses for a good price, but
... Is the FA 31 worth saving and
Thanks mate, I'll have a look at those.
James
- Original Message -
From: David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 9:17 PM
Subject: Re: PESO - ISO 800...but only because I had to
Not bad James.
WRT noise reduction
The istDL doesn't have a green button, so I've found that I have to use the
DOF preview lever to stop down the lens to get the right exposure settings
in M mode. It works but is not quick or convenient.
James
- Original Message -
From: David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
Not bad James.
WRT noise reduction software have a look at Noise Ninja:
http://www.picturecode.com/
or Neat Image (The demo version doesn't but lines through your picture
like NN does):
http://www.neatimage.com/
Both come in stand alone or plug-in versions
Cheers,
Dave
On 9/14/06, J and K
I find the left eye distracting.
But putting it aside, it's a cute scene.
Dave
On 9/14/06, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a rather dark corner of a restaurant. DA 12/24, f6.7 @ 1 second,
ISO 400. Camera resting on the table.
Thanks, Dave ... between your pics and explanation, and Lucas's
explanation, I finally got it. I knew all along how the lens/body thing
worked on older lenses, but the term aperture simulator threw me. I
never knew what it was called. Hard to believe, eh ;-))
Shel
[Original Message]
From:
Op Thu, 14 Sep 2006 13:12:13 +0200 schreef David Savage
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Have a look here Shel:
http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/Misc/Misc_014.html
The circled lever is the aperture simulator on my LX. This is how the
body knows what the lens aperture is set to. The lever and the
J and K Messervy wrote:
The istDL doesn't have a green button, so I've found that I have to use the
DOF preview lever to stop down the lens to get the right exposure settings
in M mode. It works but is not quick or convenient.
You can also use the AE-L button, it does the same than the
John,
The less light there is, the worse the noise will be. In available dark,
even 400 will be noisy, while 3200 si acceptable with enough light.
-Adam
John Coyle wrote:
Shel, I have a feeling that a firmware upgrade may have helped, with the
early versions of the D at least. Soon after
Cotty wrote:
On 14/9/06, John Forbes, discombobulated, unleashed:
Nor can Tom. Pentax have just produced the most exciting camera for years
(from any manufacturer), and Tom is struggling to find something negative
to say.
But he'll be back on form soon enough, I'm sure.
And in due
On Sep 14, 2006, at 7:40 AM, Lucas Rijnders wrote:
I think you picture the diafragm release and the diafragm actuator
(nine
o'clock position in the mount, right?). Those are the pins
responsible for
actually stopping the lens down at exposure time, and definately still
there in the
Sample to sample variation occurs. But the Pentax 50mm 1.7 1.8's have
always been up there with the best.
--
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
http://webpages.charter.net/graywolf
Idiot Proof == Expert Proof
---
Adam Maas wrote:
Compared to what? Every
At 07:58 AM 9/14/2006, you wrote:
Message: 2
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 13:08:26 +0200
From: Peter Smekal [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: K 30/2.8 the poor mans FA 31/1.8
To: pdml@pdml.net
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Hi folks,
I am thinking about buying a
Basically, all pushing, or pulling, is is moving the exposure up and
down the sensometric curve and adjusting the contrast with processing.
RAW converter seems to do about the same thing.
--
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
http://webpages.charter.net/graywolf
Idiot Proof == Expert Proof
hi,
i just got myself a K 50/ f 1.2 in very good, almost mint condition,
with a hoya 52 mm excel 1b filter thrown in for slightly less than the
equivalent of US$ 110. :))
once again, my thanks to everyone who responded to my query...
regards, subash
On 9/14/06, graywolf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fuck!
Sorry about that.
It's been updated.
Dave (doesn't know his arse from his elbow) S.
On 9/14/06, Lucas Rijnders [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Op Thu, 14 Sep 2006 13:12:13 +0200 schreef David Savage
http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/Misc/Misc_014.html
I think you picture the diafragm release
He got me and istD before they were available outside Japan last time,
and was looking to get in touch again (for obvious reasons) but he
doesn't seem to post on then list anymore and his email says he is away
until march 2007.
Is he off travelling or something?
Cheers
Rob
--
PDML
I'm not familiar with the green button. I have a question about it and
ergonomics.
I'm a DS user. When using the pre A lenses I use the AE-L button. I'm told
this does the same as the original green button. I'm using the thumb at the
AE-L button. After getting used to it, it's no problem, it
Folks,
I have a friend who looks for a cheap telezoom for his film-based Pentax.
I haven't paid attention to this part of the lens lineup for years, so
I need some help in finding the right recommendations. Do you have any
suggestions?
I guess he would like a few so that he can make a trade-off
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Sep 13, 2006, at 5:27 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Look at this official pentax page, http://www.pentaxslr.com/bodies/
k10 and you'll find these words: Power zoom function not available
Now scroll down to the bottom of the same page and download the
official PDF
On 14/9/06, Subash Jeyan, discombobulated, unleashed:
i just got myself a K 50/ f 1.2 in very good, almost mint condition,
with a hoya 52 mm excel 1b filter thrown in for slightly less than the
equivalent of US$ 110. :))
once again, my thanks to everyone who responded to my query...
Well done
On 14/9/06, Rob Brigham, discombobulated, unleashed:
He got me and istD before they were available outside Japan last time,
and was looking to get in touch again (for obvious reasons) but he
doesn't seem to post on then list anymore and his email says he is away
until march 2007.
Is he off
The K10D may be all I'll ever 'need', but, like Tom, I'd still like to
see Pentax continue to build on this upgrade and the new level of
respect it will likely realize.
Jack
--- John Forbes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nor can Tom. Pentax have just produced the most exciting camera for
years
I've got a cheap Sigma 75-300mm f4.5-5.6 that I used to use with my
Z-20 they can have cheap.
It's a piece of junk so I can't really recommend it.
Dave
On 9/14/06, Jostein Øksne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Folks,
I have a friend who looks for a cheap telezoom for his film-based Pentax.
I
This is a small camera but still takes 2 card formats. Is xD compatible
with SD?
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0609/06091401olympuse400.asp
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML
So far I'm pleased with my Tamron 28-300
Bill
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
David Savage
Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 9:06 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Recommendation for telezoom?
I've got a cheap Sigma 75-300mm
About anytime shooting jpegs, shooting raw it is moot, as you can easily
change it during conversion.
--
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
http://webpages.charter.net/graywolf
Idiot Proof == Expert Proof
---
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
I've never seen the need
I have an appointment with my urologist at Duke tomorrow, so we're leaving
this evening and spending the night. The hotel has internet access so I'm
taking the computer and hoping it is wireless since I don't have a proper
cable for hard wiring.
Bill
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
That's a really small camera.
I can feel my hands cramping up just looking at it.
Dave
On 9/14/06, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is a small camera but still takes 2 card formats. Is xD compatible
with SD?
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0609/06091401olympuse400.asp
--
PDML
Op Thu, 14 Sep 2006 14:38:08 +0200 schreef Jostein Øksne
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Folks,
I have a friend who looks for a cheap telezoom for his film-based Pentax.
I haven't paid attention to this part of the lens lineup for years, so
I need some help in finding the right recommendations. Do you
No, xd is much smaller than a sd.
Bill
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Cotty
Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 8:59 AM
To: pentax list
Subject: OT - new Oly takes xD and CF
This is a small camera but still takes 2 card formats. Is xD
On 9/14/06 9:17 AM, K.Takeshita, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Re memory cards, Oly are stuck with the proprietary xD and if anything comes
with only xD, the sales would be doomed. So they really have no choice for the
dual format.
Re the size, this should be what the 4/3 should have been. It
On 14/9/06, Bill Owens, discombobulated, unleashed:
No, xd is much smaller than a sd.
Thanks Bill
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On 9/14/06 9:03 AM, David Savage, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's a really small camera.
I can feel my hands cramping up just looking at it.
Dave
On 9/14/06, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is a small camera but still takes 2 card formats. Is xD compatible
with SD?
On 14/09/06, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's a really small camera.
Pentax will be poohing themselves, who wears the crown now. LOL
--
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio//publications/
http://www.dpreview.com/articles/PentaxK10D/Images/Captures/TV2006090616253900-01.jpg
This shot which illustrates the in camera RAW processing does indeed suggest
setting ISO after the event? Or are they just misleading by using ISO in the
display to mean brightness in general?
Rob
On 9/14/06, Digital Image Studio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 14/09/06, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's a really small camera.
Pentax will be poohing themselves, who wears the crown now. LOL
Oly. can have it as far as I'm concerned.
I find the D without grip too small.
Dave
--
Nope, only Oly and Fuji use them that I know of. They also have not
gotten cheap. Consider XD cards as being semi-proprietary. The C-5050Z
was the first Oly to use the dual card setup. I still like mine.
interestingly it will do about 90% of what I need/want a camera to do.
The K10D looks like
On 14.09.2006, at 15:21 , Digital Image Studio wrote:
Pentax will be poohing themselves, who wears the crown now. LOL
At least until Optio-S-sized K1000D comes ;-)
Cheers,
Sylwek
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Cotty wrote:
This is a small camera but still takes 2 card formats. Is xD compatible
with SD?
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0609/06091401olympuse400.asp
All the recent Oly 4/3rds bodies take both. But it's certainly true that
this is the first really small DSLR to do so.
Bloody small, no
Op Thu, 14 Sep 2006 15:43:13 +0200 schreef graywolf
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
A K1000D is an obvious step.
At PMA, when the K100 gets the 10Mp chip :o)
--
Regards, Lucas
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
A K1000D is an obvious step.
--
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
http://webpages.charter.net/graywolf
Idiot Proof == Expert Proof
---
Paul Stenquist wrote:
On Sep 13, 2006, at 7:56 PM, Tom C wrote:
Now, if they can just avoid downgrading it more than
Op Thu, 14 Sep 2006 15:03:26 +0200 schreef David Savage
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
That's a really small camera.
I can feel my hands cramping up just looking at it.
Huh? It's about the size of the M-, A-, or MZ-series, which is fine in my
book. That K10, on the other hand, comes close to a Z-1.
On 14/09/06, Rob Brigham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.dpreview.com/articles/PentaxK10D/Images/Captures/TV2006090616253900-01.jpg
This shot which illustrates the in camera RAW processing does indeed suggest
setting ISO after the event? Or are they just misleading by using ISO in the
On 9/14/06, Lucas Rijnders [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Op Thu, 14 Sep 2006 15:03:26 +0200 schreef David Savage
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
That's a really small camera.
I can feel my hands cramping up just looking at it.
Huh? It's about the size of the M-, A-, or MZ-series
Yeah. Too small for me to
On 9/14/06 9:43 AM, graywolf, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A K1000D is an obvious step.
And there already are some talks in Japan of K1D to be launched in 2007. At
this point, I of course have to regard it as rumours/speculations.
But when Pentax reasonably complete their FDA line of lenses with
On 14/09/06, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I find the D without grip too small.
I definitely wouldn't be fazed to own a larger camera, even 5D sized
at this stage though the M8 does look tempting ;-)
--
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL
David Savage wrote:
On 9/14/06, Lucas Rijnders [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Op Thu, 14 Sep 2006 15:03:26 +0200 schreef David Savage
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
That's a really small camera.
I can feel my hands cramping up just looking at it.
Huh? It's about the size of the M-, A-, or MZ-series
Yeah.
http://www.graywolfphoto.com/pentax/pdml-faq.html
--
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
http://webpages.charter.net/graywolf
Idiot Proof == Expert Proof
---
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
237 RAW (PEF or DNG) files to a 4GB card
The most likely sensor, matches most of the published camera specs
plus pads visually match:
http://www.sony.co.jp/Products/SC-HP/cx_pal/vol69/pdf/icx493aqa.pdf
And it appears to utilize dual Nucore ADCs
--
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel
Tim Øsleby wrote:
I'm not familiar with the green button. I have a question about it and
ergonomics.
I'm a DS user. When using the pre A lenses I use the AE-L button. I'm told
this does the same as the original green button. I'm using the thumb at the
AE-L button. After getting used to it,
Hands-on review here
http://www.digit.no/wip4/detail.epl?id=98892
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Cotty
Sent: 14. september 2006 14:59
To: pentax list
Subject: OT - new Oly takes xD and CF
For Cotty and anyone else who wants to know the reletive sizes of CF,
SD, and XD cards a QD snapshot:
http://www.graywolfphoto.com/digital/_images/Cards.jpg
--
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
http://webpages.charter.net/graywolf
Idiot Proof == Expert Proof
From: Rob Brigham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/09/14 Thu PM 12:34:19 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Anyone know what happened to Peter from sunny Brighton
He got me and istD before they were available outside Japan last time,
and was looking to get in touch
1 - 100 of 345 matches
Mail list logo
