I found this specimen in the bathroom today and took a few shots with the
macro lens and wireless, off camera flash. Bouncing the flash off the floor
tiles the spider was on gave it this fragile, made of glass look.
http://i13.photobucket.com/albums/a271/ShermanHJ60/DaddyLongLegs.jpg
Cheers
Now that's the sort of picture nightmares are made of
Nice focus on the body and rear (middle?) legs.
Cheers
Brian
++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney Australia
Quoting J and K Messervy [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I found this specimen in the bathroom today and
I will resume C++ as being a layer over C but half-broken due tu
compatibility reason with C whoch is itself ASM with a layer supposed
to let it look like a normal language but really is only ASM.
Well that's how I see it. But C++ is not that difficult to read, if
you rememer you read a sort of
Thanks Ann.
have to know - that is a Kenneth Noland painting isnt it - in
this shot?
http://www.web-options.com/London/London/content/P1273087_large.html
You have the better of me, I'm afraid. I hadn't heard of Kenneth
Noland until you mentioned him. I've tried to find out, but a quick
Lightroom says No.
--
Bob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Boris Liberman
Sent: 28 January 2007 05:10
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Olympian
Markus, I think it a typical case of pixel envy :-).
Bob, please can
Now that I have some Olympus gear I shall be lobbying for the laws of
physics to be repealed.
--
Bob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Brian Walters
Sent: 28 January 2007 06:04
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Olympian (a
John - good post, and an interesting story.
--
Bob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of John Celio
Sent: 28 January 2007 05:54
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Olympian (a salesperson's story) (long)
Godfrey wrote:
I
Paul,
As promised, I shot a bit with the SMC Pentax 28/3.5 today. This one is
wide open at 1/15th, ISO 1600:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5513023size=lg
wide open? :-O Phew, your crippled mule is doing pretty well I'd say... ;-)
Cheers,
Peter
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
Thanks Peter. Yes, the old 28/3.5 is a very good lens. Back in the day
when we frequently discussed things like K series lenses, the consensus
was that it was better than the 2.8 in K, M or A configuration, but it
has sort of disappeared into the murky past:-).
Paul
On Jan 28, 2007, at 5:50 AM,
Thanks Bruce.
On Jan 28, 2007, at 2:31 AM, Bruce Dayton wrote:
Hello Paul,
The shot of Grace is really wonderful. The lens appears to be no
slouch either. Thanks for sharing.
--
Bruce
Saturday, January 27, 2007, 1:27:27 PM, you wrote:
PS As promised, I shot a bit with the SMC
http://dc.watch.impress.co.jp/cda/parts/image_for_link/79704-5442-1-1.html
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Dario Bonazza a écrit :
http://dc.watch.impress.co.jp/cda/parts/image_for_link/79704-5442-1-1.html
http://translate.google.com/translate?u=http%3A%2F%2Fdc.watch.impress.co.jp%2Fcda%2Fparts%2Fimage_for_link%2F79704-5442-1-1.htmllangpair=ja%7Cenhl=frie=UTF-8oe=UTF-8prev=%2Flanguage_tools
The
A case for spare batteries and cards??
On Jan 28, 2007, at 7:37 AM, Dario Bonazza wrote:
http://dc.watch.impress.co.jp/cda/parts/image_for_link/79704-5442-1
-1.html
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
So far, I've decided I'll be using Elements as my backend. The only downside
that is significant is the lack of batch processing capabilities. Besides
that Elements is more then I really need, I believe. This might change the
day I am capable of using Elements, for far I'm just scratching the
Cool.
Cheers,
Dave
On 1/28/07, J and K Messervy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://i13.photobucket.com/albums/a271/ShermanHJ60/DaddyLongLegs.jpg
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Looks to me like a SD card storage case.
Cheers,
Dave
On 1/28/07, Dario Bonazza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://dc.watch.impress.co.jp/cda/parts/image_for_link/79704-5442-1-1.html
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
The market (many at the market) says that camera based SR is best at short
focal lengths, and lens based IS is best at long focal length.
What do you who have used SR for a while say? Truth or myth?
We have had the theoretical debate, but what does practical use tell us?
Tim
Mostly harmless
I will resume C++ as being a layer over C but half-broken due tu
compatibility reason with C whoch is itself ASM with a layer supposed
to let it look like a normal language but really is only ASM.
Speaking of unparseable... :)
-Cory
--
On 1/28/07 7:37 AM, Dario Bonazza, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://dc.watch.impress.co.jp/cda/parts/image_for_link/79704-5442-1-1.html
Buy a ticket to Japan, buy a K10d there and you get the media case and a SD
card :-).
http://www.pentax.co.jp/japan/info/k10d/index.html
Ken
--
PDML
Attenborough in those days was working directly with Jim Frazier, before
Panavision became involved. When Life On Earth was being made Frazier
personally did the cinematography for the close-up stuff.
An interesting side story is that Panavision's deal with Jim Frazier
permitted him to not
Interesting light.
It makes me wonder what's inside the head.
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of J
and K Messervy
Sent: 28. januar 2007 09:14
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: PESO - Daddy
The market (many at the market) says that camera based SR is best at short
focal lengths, and lens based IS is best at long focal length.
What do you who have used SR for a while say? Truth or myth?
We have had the theoretical debate, but what does practical use tell us?
That
On 1/28/07 8:26 AM, Tim Øsleby, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What do you who have used SR for a while say? Truth or myth?
We have had the theoretical debate, but what does practical use tell us?
I have both. Comparison between CCD shift type and in-lens type is still
being hotly debated
On 1/28/07 8:41 AM, Cory Papenfuss, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think Canon is going to have to eat their hat WRT in-body SR.
Rumour says that's exactly what Canon is contemplating. Who knows? But
it indicates that both methods are toss-up. Canon can no longer charge high
price for IS lenses
- Original Message -
From: Mark Cassino
Subject: Re: IE7 and photo uploading
I've had a lot of problems with IE7 - both the 64 bit version on my X64
machine and the 32 bit version on my 32 bit machine. I have several
browsers on both - Netscape, Firefox, Opera - to test drive my
- Original Message -
From: Tim Øsleby
Subject: Camera based SR vs. lens based IS?
The market (many at the market) says that camera based SR is best at short
focal lengths, and lens based IS is best at long focal length.
What do you who have used SR for a while say? Truth or myth?
On Jan 28, 2007, at 6:01 AM, William Robb wrote:
The market (many at the market) says that camera based SR is best
at short
focal lengths, and lens based IS is best at long focal length.
What do you who have used SR for a while say? Truth or myth?
We have had the theoretical debate, but
I don't follow you now. Language barrier?
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
William Robb
Sent: 28. januar 2007 15:01
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Camera based SR vs. lens based IS?
More in common than you might think. Windows Explorer is a functional
Webbrowser (All the browser bits are DLL's, the program is just the
interface).
-Adam
David Savage wrote:
Internet Explorer is the Microsoft web browser. Windows Explorer is
the file management/navigation system for the
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Jan 28, 2007, at 6:01 AM, William Robb wrote:
The market (many at the market) says that camera based SR is best
at short
focal lengths, and lens based IS is best at long focal length.
What do you who have used SR for a while say? Truth or myth?
We have had the
If it ain't broken, don't fix it ;-).
The lens based IS can be fine tuned and specially tailored for the
given lens. Camera based SR is a general solution. As such it is
probably more limited. However, you can still mount your K 200/4 and
have SR handily available.
Frankly, I don't care either
Cory, you definitely did not read Leo Tolstoy in original form. Half a
page of printed text being a single sentence is not uncommon. Compared
to that, everything else is just three word sentence ;-).
On 1/28/07, Cory Papenfuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I will resume C++ as being a layer over C
I am so relieved that they stopped supporting IE for Mac OS X.
G
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
I've had two Panasonics, one Canon with in-lens image stabilization,
and one Konica Minolta, one Pentax with in-body stabilization. With
the Panasonic FZ10, the zoom range was ~35mm to 410mm FoV (35mm
terms); the Canon I had 70-200 and 300mm IS lenses and a 1.4x
teleconverter. With the KM
- Original Message -
From: Boris Liberman
Subject: Re: Camera based SR vs. lens based IS?
If it ain't broken, don't fix it ;-).
The lens based IS can be fine tuned and specially tailored for the
given lens. Camera based SR is a general solution. As such it is
probably more limited.
- Original Message -
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi
Subject: Re: Camera based SR vs. lens based IS?
I'd like to know which lens based SR lenses there are in the 400-600mm
range.
Canon EF 400 f/2.8L IS
Canon EF 600 f/4L IS
A whole two?
Gee.
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
- Original Message -
From: Tim Øsleby
Subject: RE: Camera based SR vs. lens based IS?
I don't follow you now. Language barrier?
I was intimating that the best system is the one that exists in usable form.
If you want SR on a 400-600mm lens, you either bust a nut carrying around
big
I have to agree with you, sir William ;-).
On 1/28/07, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The not so nice thing about taking photography away from photographers and
putting it into the hands of flakes is that the equipment can no longer just
take pictures.
There's too many people out there
Thibouille wrote:
I have to produce a software as a final evaluation of my computer
sciences studies.
Exif/ipct collecting from files?
How about a full Exif for pentax cameras, including maker's marks?
I've not seen anything like that before. Might be suitable for an
undergrad kind of
On 1/28/07, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Mark Cassino
Subject: Re: IE7 and photo uploading
I've had a lot of problems with IE7 - both the 64 bit version on my X64
machine and the 32 bit version on my 32 bit machine. I have several
browsers on
You're enjoying this aren't you, Godfrey? :-())
Jack
--- Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am so relieved that they stopped supporting IE for Mac OS X.
G
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Me too, Jack. I steer away from MS products as far as I can though I
*am* running Windoze at home.
On 1/28/07, Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You're enjoying this aren't you, Godfrey? :-())
Jack
--- Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am so relieved that they stopped
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi
Subject: Re: Camera based SR vs. lens based IS?
I'd like to know which lens based SR lenses there are in the 400-600mm
range.
Canon EF 400 f/2.8L IS
Canon EF 600 f/4L IS
A whole two?
Gee.
William Robb
Tolstoy has nothing on Victor Hugo!
--
Bob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Boris Liberman
Sent: 28 January 2007 14:44
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Interest in developing a software around photograhy?
Cory, you
On Jan 28, 2007, at 7:31 AM, Adam Maas wrote:
I'd like to know which lens based SR lenses there are in the
400-600mm
range.
Canon EF 400 f/2.8L IS
Canon EF 600 f/4L IS
A whole two?
Gee.
William Robb
4 actually, there's also the 400/4 DO IS USM and the 500/4 IS USM.
Yes, sorry ...
Do you read French??? I thought you were from that island, what is its
name again? ;-)
On 1/28/07, Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tolstoy has nothing on Victor Hugo!
--
Bob
--
Boris
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
http://roman.blakout.net/?blog=20070128170110
After prolonged fall it is finally some snow in my backyard. This is
where rollover effect if far more useful than in photo blog index.
Here'showing exif while moved over the image. I usually don't like
photoshopping, but here couldn't resist
Not really.
I worked in the computer industry not because it paid a lot of money
(which it did) but because the tools it can create empowers me and
everyone else to a more creative life. Seeing people struggle with
garbage software is very sad.
G
On Jan 28, 2007, at 7:30 AM, Jack Davis
Grande Bretagne? Yes, I have even read some of Victor Hugo's poetry,
as well as his ordinately long-winded prose, in French. Give me
Flaubert any day.
Mind you, most of the late 19th century authors remind me of Hoare's
comments about COBOL: It aimed at readability but unfortunately
achieved only
I agree with you, Godfrey. It is just that neither you nor I can fix
all there is to fix out there ;-).
On 1/28/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not really.
I worked in the computer industry not because it paid a lot of money
(which it did) but because the tools it can create
Recently I picked up a used ist D, usually I use my card reader to
transfer pics but recently when I connected it with the USB cable I
discovered a problem. There seems to be connection problem. Unless
I hold the cable in it won't connect. I don't know if the faults in
the cable or in
Cables are generally more likely to be a problem than anything else.
That said, I've almost never connected any of my cameras to a
computer, I always use a card reader.
Pentax USA can certainly supply you with a replacement cable. I would
stick with an OEM original.
G
On Jan 28, 2007, at
Hi All:
Even though super-zooms usually have inferior design to more moderate
zooms, I started thinking about buying one of these for those situations
where I need to switch between different types of focal lengths and do
not have time (or too lazy) to swap lenses.
So, I am looking at 18-200
I just looked at the line of Tokina AF lenses and was surprised:
they removed many good lenses from there:
http://thkphoto.com/products/tokina/index.html
I am not sure if this is a sign that they are soon to introduce digital
versions of the older lenses (28-70 and 19-35), or they are shrinking
Sheesh, been back on list, what?, a week and a half? And already my email
box is filling up every day. You guys sure talk a lot. :-)
Pretty busy, and I like to PESO comment first -- I will try to get to some
much belated PESO comments later this week -- but here's a PESO. I haven't
posted
In a message dated 1/28/2007 8:28:53 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I agree with you, Godfrey. It is just that neither you nor I can fix
all there is to fix out there ;-).
On 1/28/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not really.
I worked in the computer
That was already evident at Photokina last September, where they were only
promoting the Pentax co-developed lenses. At that time, I was rather
surprised by that.
Now I better understand it all as a re-shaping of their line, something that
Pentax did in 2005-2006 with the infamous Pentax lens
For those who missed the Pentax massacre, here is the recap:
http://theonlinephotographer.blogspot.com/2006/02/pentax-holds-product-massacre-too.html
Dario
- Original Message -
From: Dario Bonazza [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Sunday, January 28,
Evan,
If you have a USB 2 connection on your computer and a
USB 2 card reader, there is no reason to use the cable
from the camera--unless you like s-l-o-o-o-w transfers
(45 min to 1 h for a 2 gig card full of pix) and
running the camera's battery down.
Rick
--- Evan Hanson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In a message dated 1/28/2007 8:42:46 A.M. Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
.com writes:
On Jan 28, 2007, at 8:22 AM, Evan Hanson wrote:
Recently I picked up a used ist D, usually I use my card reader to
transfer pics but recently when I connected it with the USB cable I
discovered
I found this specimen in the bathroom today and took a few shots with the
macro lens and wireless, off camera flash. Bouncing the flash off the
floor
tiles the spider was on gave it this fragile, made of glass look.
http://i13.photobucket.com/albums/a271/ShermanHJ60/DaddyLongLegs.jpg
Very
You must, however, be pleased to have your decisions validated even
though I'm sure you don't either seek or need it.
In addition, it was meant as a 'playful' remark. ;)
J
--- Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not really.
I worked in the computer industry not because it paid a lot
Marnie, I'm afraid you're standing on the banana peal of the damned.
Tech progress will forever create a perpetual Groundhog Day for the
newbie.
Jack
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 1/28/2007 8:28:53 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I agree with you,
Scott Loveless wrote:
Ugh! That sucks. If your machine is still set to pull updates from
M$ automatically it's going to do it again.
The key to not getting IE7 rammed down your throat as a mandatory update
is to not upgrade Windows Update itself to Microsoft Update. If you
haven't upgraded
Interesting, unusual rendering. Nice shot.
--
Bruce
Sunday, January 28, 2007, 12:13:49 AM, you wrote:
JaKM I found this specimen in the bathroom today and took a few shots with the
JaKM macro lens and wireless, off camera flash. Bouncing the flash off the
floor
JaKM tiles the spider was on
So, I am looking at 18-200 f/3.5-6.3 that are made by Tamron and Sigma.
Does anybody have any experience with either of them?
In my experience at my last job as well as with lenses I've owned, Tamron is
almost always better than Sigma. At the very least, Tamron lenses won't
have the
Mike is right that there is an Icelander on the list, but after changing jobs
last summer I've been too busy to participate, except for PUGs.
I'll try to outline some things that you should see here, but feel free to
contact me for further information.
First on what Pal said: He was mostly
On 28/1/07, Jack Davis, discombobulated, unleashed:
I'm afraid you're standing on the banana peal of the damned.
Mark!
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
The D supports hyper program with two control wheels as opposed to one
wheel on the Ds/Ds2 which doesn't support that mode. The D has a
smaller grip, (or perhaps I should say the Ds has a deeper grip), and a
better finished body with a PC socket.
Thought the Ds has doors covering the various
If anyone is interested, the PZ-117, for use with the Battery Grip, has a
metal loop on the right hand side which allows for use of the old PZ-1p grip
strap, which I always liked. It gives me a firmer grasp of the body, since
I dislike shooting with the neck strap around my neck or shoulder.
Hello everyone,
I'm new to the list, and new to Digital SLR Photography. I had been
craving a Cannon 30d for about a year, but when I finally got really
serious and read reviews, etc... I decided on the K10d.
I had the added (dubious) benefit of some old Sears k-mount lenses
floating around my
I think you guys are forgetting the fact that Canon introduced
IS (in-lenses) long before DSLRs even existed and you cant even
do in-body image stabilization with film cameras. So there
was NO debate at the time which was better, in-lenses was
infinately better at the time, because in-body was
I downloaded Adobe Lightroom yesterday because lots of you are talking
positive things about it. The use seems to be pretty straightforward and I
am able to import shots, manipulate as desired, and on screen the image
looks fine. These are all images that I have previously worked in PS
Welcome Cory.
First off, there are a lot of knowledgeable folk on this list. Fire away.:-)
Secondly, i like your shots on your flikr account.
Thirdly, don'tr listen to anything Cotty or Frank have to say.;-)
Dave Brooks
BTW, sorry about the Canon.LOL
On 1/28/07, Corey Leopold [EMAIL
I ordered one back in early December. Not holding my breath.
Dave
On 1/28/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The FA77/1.8 Limited is a delightful lens and if you want
compatibility to a 35mm SLR as well, it's the natural choice.
I sold mine and replaced it with the DA70/2.4
Nicely composed and a somewhat provocative image. Due to lighting, and
DOF, the bench is being referenced as a point to consider by the
viewer. Insights curiosity.
Welcome and I get that attachment with my father.
Jack
--- Corey Leopold [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello everyone,
I'm new to the
It's a zoom, you make allowances.
Peter Lacus wrote:
Paul,
The K 28/3.5 might be the sharpest and best resolving 28 of them all.
Unfortunately, it's as slow as a crippled mule. But I still use mine.
if 3.5 is slow as a crippled mule, how would you characterize for
example
On 1/28/07 1:48 PM, J. C. O'Connell, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think you guys are forgetting the fact that Canon introduced
IS (in-lenses) long before DSLRs even existed and you cant even
do in-body image stabilization with film cameras. So there
was NO debate at the time which was better,
Thanks guys but I'm beginning to suspect a camera fault. Both the
delete and info buttons now seem nonfunctional which is a real shame
because so far I love the camera.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Perhaps well known site to many of you but I've stumbled upon it just
today.
http://www.cambridgeincolour.com/tutorials.htm
Lots of practical things are covered and also presentation itself is the
best I've seen so far, easy to understand and illustrated on live pictures.
Cheers,
Peter
--
Guys. What you say is probably valid, but it is a repetition of the
theoretical debate. What do you who have tried both in body and in lens say
from a real life point of view?
Pardon my bluntness. If I had used my own tongue, I could and would have
said this smoother.
Tim
Mostly harmless (just
Though it is warm out - comparatively speaking - I am idly sitting by and
letting the rain have its way with the outdoors.
I went back and took this shot and converted and resized it for posting. I was
in Manhattan walking about on a Friday and took some time to sit in Bryant
Park. This is
Hello Boris,
Saturday, January 27, 2007, 6:39:31 PM, you wrote:
Hi!
http://not.contaxg.com/document.php?id=16421full=1
I hope it at least makes you chuckle ;-).
Boris
That it does. Some heavy hardware programming is going on there:)
--
Attila
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Either it is a Noland or a rip-off
He was a color-field guy who painted in the 50's and 60's - Morris
Louis dribbled, Noland did stripes.
I figured the guy was walking by a museum - yes?
a
Bob W wrote:
Thanks Ann.
have to know - that is a Kenneth Noland painting isnt it - in
this
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Cotty
Sent: 28 January 2007 18:04
To: pentax list
Subject: Re: IE7 and photo uploading
On 28/1/07, Jack Davis, discombobulated, unleashed:
I'm afraid you're standing on the banana peal of the
Very nice. I like it even if it has been artified!
Looks believable.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PESO -- Redwood Etch
Sheesh, been back on list, what?, a week and a half? And already my email
box is filling up every day. You guys sure talk a
Just tagging onto the thread here to toss in my two cents.
I guess this is one of those things that is a pretty simple decision
for me. Even if I had a bag full of expensive IS lenses I'd want to
have SR in the body for all of those plain old every day lenses.
If I have SR in the body it works
Hi Bill. Nice to see you here. You're shooting with a K10D now? Good
move.
Paul
On Jan 28, 2007, at 1:19 PM, Bill Sawyer wrote:
If anyone is interested, the PZ-117, for use with the Battery Grip,
has a
metal loop on the right hand side which allows for use of the old
PZ-1p grip
strap,
Taken just before the harvest last fall. Kodachrome. I forget which
lens and body.
http://picasaweb.google.com/sdloveless/PDMLPESO/photo#5025172551467732034
Thanks for looking. Any and all comments appreciated.
--
Scott Loveless
http://www.twosixteen.com
Shoot more film!
--
PDML
Nope,
The first DSLR (Kodak DCS100 based on the F3HP) was introduced
commercially in 1991.
The first 35mm camera with IS (A Nikon VR PS, can't recall the model)
was introduced 3 years later in 1994. Canon IS lenses would show up a
year later in the form of the craptacular 75-300 IS USM. The
It's a railway bridge close to Tate Modern. He has exhibited at Tate
Liverpool, so I should think you're right.
--
Bob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of ann sanfedele
Sent: 28 January 2007 19:31
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Not bad, but if you're familiar with Vincent Van Gogh's
famous version, this is coming up quite a bit short.
Sorry, but you asked for comments, just being honest...
http://home.wxs.nl/~wmt/kraai01.jpg
jco
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
If anyone does that I can buy the media case from a volunteer ;)
2007/1/28, K.Takeshita [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 1/28/07 7:37 AM, Dario Bonazza, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://dc.watch.impress.co.jp/cda/parts/image_for_link/79704-5442-1-1.html
Buy a ticket to Japan, buy a K10d there and you
On Jan 28, 2007, at 11:16 AM, Tim Øsleby wrote:
Guys. What you say is probably valid, but it is a repetition of the
theoretical debate. What do you who have tried both in body and in
lens say
from a real life point of view?
Pardon my bluntness. If I had used my own tongue, I could and would
Was the DS2 a very short lived, relatively low production item
compared to the other istD series DSLRS? I am not
seeing many of them left on the new market and
almost none used while there seems to be plenty of the
istD and istDS out there both new and used at this time.
jco
-Original
A fine way to enter the PDML: with a good, interesting photograph to
offer! Welcome!
Nice work ... I like the feel of the composition and the rendering
looks pretty darn good.
enjoy
Godfrey
On Jan 28, 2007, at 10:44 AM, Corey Leopold wrote:
... Anyway I was out and about in Hemisfair Park
On 29/01/07, Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Marnie, I'm afraid you're standing on the banana peal of the damned.
Tech progress will forever create a perpetual Groundhog Day for the
newbie.
And with each new release greater depths of depression for the
experienced user whist tying to
OK, so change my post to before CANON DSLRS existed. And
all those early DSLRS were extremely expensive,
esoteric, nearly 100% commercial items, not mainsteam photo
market items like film cameras were back in the mid 90's.
My point is these early IS lenses canon put out were not
aimed at the
On Jan 28, 2007, at 8:41 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This one I have artified to be more like an etching, a little less
like a
photograph. This is close to the one I have printed and up on my
wall. Although
the jpg has a few more artifacts than original psd. It looks
amazingly
Hello guys
Photographing yesterday - in the first snow this winter - I discovered that
my *ist D did not focus accurately anymore.
I have tried to put all the different lenses I used on my MZ-S. This seemed
to focus normally - that is very accurately.
Have anyone had this experience with the D?
1 - 100 of 218 matches
Mail list logo
