It's not the first time I notice that you have an eye for the photogenic
mom's Paul ;-)
Greetings
Markus
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul
Stenquist
Sent: Sunday, April 01, 2007 3:23 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: PESO:
Hi Bruce
It does not work for me. I would love a really full field of flowers here
and more of them in DOF.
Maybe you could have concentrated on the middle part leaving out the top and
bottom green and use another angle.
Can't explain it better...
Greetings
Markus
-Original Message-
Hi Bong
A great photo and a wise decision to carry a MX as backup.
Greetings
Markus
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul
Stenquist
Sent: Sunday, April 01, 2007 3:26 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: PESO: A funny thing
Bruce Dayton wrote:
This is the full frame shot. I rather like it in context and how it
turned out rather than a hefty crop to show just the bird. What I
like is how the bushes he is perched on are in the plane of focus and
the background really blurs out.
You betcha! Good job!
keith
This is a 30 (!) shot panorama (5 rows of 6 shots). Each shot was taken at
55mm focal length and the stitched image was a little over 1gb and
equivalent to 123 megapixels! This has been heavily resized obviously but
I'll be printing this about 60cm by 35cm when I've got the money.
These
I can't image having the patience (or the computer power) to do this. I dips
me lid
Obviously it loses a lot of impact at the small scale - looking at the web
image it doesn't look like a panorama.
Cheers
Brian
++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney Australia
You're welcome. Every little bit helps.
Paul
On Apr 1, 2007, at 12:19 AM, David Savage wrote:
Paul thanks for the heads up on the profiles. They made a bit of a
difference :-)
Cheers,
Dave
On 4/1/07, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not only that my printer driver is a couple of
Good catch. But I'd clone some grass in around the bottom of the
frame, so it doesn't look like her right rear leg is cut off. The
grass is covering the bottom of the legs anyway. You can get away
with a clone job here:-).
Paul
On Apr 1, 2007, at 12:46 AM, Bruce Dayton wrote:
Shot while
Hi Markus,
On Sat, 31 Mar 2007 23:27:53 +0200, Markus Maurer wrote:
This welder did not take notice of me so I could use the Pentax A50mm macro
from about 2 meters distance here.
Early in the morning at 2 o'clock after computer work on my way home in the
industrial quarter of Zurich with the
Good choice. I like it.
Paul
On Apr 1, 2007, at 12:48 AM, Bruce Dayton wrote:
This is the full frame shot. I rather like it in context and how it
turned out rather than a hefty crop to show just the bird. What I
like is how the bushes he is perched on are in the plane of focus and
the
I like the concept. Not sure about the composition and the lack of DOF.
Paul
On Apr 1, 2007, at 12:43 AM, Bruce Dayton wrote:
I'm trying to decide what I think of this shot. I would appreciate
your opinions on it.
Pentax K10D, Sigma 100-300/4 EX @ 110mm, Handheld
ISO 280, 1/250 sec @ f/8
Hi Bruce,
On Sat, 31 Mar 2007 21:41:18 -0700, Bruce Dayton wrote:
Out roaming today, found several of these little fellows. Took
several shots of this pair, but like this one best.
Pentax K10D, Tamron 90/2.8 AF macro, handheld
ISO 100, 1/250 sec @ f/6.7
Hi Bruce,
On Sat, 31 Mar 2007 21:43:37 -0700, Bruce Dayton wrote:
I'm trying to decide what I think of this shot. I would appreciate
your opinions on it.
Pentax K10D, Sigma 100-300/4 EX @ 110mm, Handheld
ISO 280, 1/250 sec @ f/8
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_4616.htm
Hmm, doe not do
Thanks Markus. BTW, this photo will soon disappear. It's a limited
engagement:-).
Paul
On Apr 1, 2007, at 5:18 AM, Markus Maurer wrote:
It's not the first time I notice that you have an eye for the
photogenic
mom's Paul ;-)
Greetings
Markus
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
Hi James
I would love to see it at printing size, it's a beautiful place.
Did you use a normal tripod or special panoramic head gear for that?
I have never done a panorama with more than 1 row, will have to try that too
:-)
Thanks for showing it and greetings
Markus
-Original Message-
Very nice. But as to the DOF it seems you are sitting between two chairs.
The DOF is either too shallow (to get all flowers sharp) or to wide in order
to use the DOF for isolating / emphasising some of the flowers.
Regards
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
+45 56 63 77 11
+45 23 43 85 77
Skype:
Very nice, Bruce. I know how difficult shot slike this is to get :-)
Regards
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
+45 56 63 77 11
+45 23 43 85 77
Skype: jensbladt248
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af Bruce
Dayton
Sendt: 1. april 2007 06:46
Hi Markus
I just used a normal tripod, but made sure I levelled it very carefully.
Thanks very much.
James
- Original Message -
From: Markus Maurer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List' pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Sunday, April 01, 2007 9:41 PM
Subject: RE: PESO - Fairy Bower Falls
Paul,
It's my fault, but a camera case for the digitals is a problem. I'd
like a bottom half case like I use on the LX, but they would cover the
screen. So here I am...
Regards, Bob S.
On 3/31/07, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Damn. Sorry for your misfortune here. But I don't think
Beautiful, Tom!
Regards
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
+45 56 63 77 11
+45 23 43 85 77
Skype: jensbladt248
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af Tom C
Sendt: 26. marts 2007 22:20
Til: pdml@pdml.net
Emne: PESO - Flow
Well done, Cotty. The wine should be just as nice :-)
Regards
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
+45 56 63 77 11
+45 23 43 85 77
Skype: jensbladt248
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af Cotty
Sendt: 29. marts 2007 01:01
Til: pentax list
Emne:
Excellent work. A beautiful scene, and as you said, well worth the
effort.
Paul
On Apr 1, 2007, at 8:00 AM, J and K Messervy wrote:
Hi Markus
I just used a normal tripod, but made sure I levelled it very
carefully.
Thanks very much.
James
- Original Message -
From: Markus
On 1/4/07, Jan van Wijk, discombobulated, unleashed:
I used to do some welding as a holiday-job years ago :-)
(as my father was a welder too)
Two meters is a bit risky for your equipment though, you can see the little
droplets of molten metal flying arround. I know from experience that they
I'm sure Pentax can fix that screen quickly and probably without much
cost. But I wasn't talking about camera coverings. I've never used
one on any camera. They just get in the way. I was talking about
bags. Quality bags that are designed for transporting cameras can
protect the equipment
frank did pretty well injuring himself a while back without _trying_ :(
ann
frank theriault wrote:
On 3/30/07, mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone in Seattle?
http://twoplusthree.com/piejoust/#
I may be crazy, but I'm not stupid...
;-)
cheers,
frank
--
PDML
I think it needs an anchor of some sort. Just too homogeneous with no
direction for the eye.
As composed, I feel the foreground should be in focus.
Jack
--- Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to decide what I think of this shot. I would appreciate
your opinions on it.
Pentax
See what would have happened if i had not panicked and asked this question.
LOL
Dave B
On 4/1/07, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Paul thanks for the heads up on the profiles. They made a bit of a
difference :-)
Cheers,
Dave
On 4/1/07, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not
Thanks guys!
Alastair, I thought about the crop too, you're right it might look
better without it. The available light would not allow me to stop
down to get a better DOF and have the innards of the piano in focus.
And ...ah yes... the trusty MX :-)
Bong
On 4/1/07, Markus Maurer [EMAIL
Har!
And my thanks to you too Dave. :-)
Cheers,
Dave S.
On 4/1/07, David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
See what would have happened if i had not panicked and asked this question.
LOL
Dave B
On 4/1/07, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Paul thanks for the heads up on the
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5794876
Looking around for some things to use on another forum and came acroos this one.
Last October on the drive home from Thansgiving weekend. Small falls
but at least it had some colour.
D200, 70-200VR, 1.7 Tele and tripod. Auto levels and a touch of
Just kidding Sir.
But seriously, anyone using the coated Enhanced Matte or are we all
pretty much using the standard Enhanced Matte finish.
Maybe the coated is something only availabe here in Canada.?It did
not seem to show up in Godfreys USA link.
Dave
On 4/1/07, David Savage [EMAIL
Bong,
I like this.
A couple of suggestions/comments:
- In taking it, I think it would have been stronger with a bit wider
field of view and a slight downward tilt to obtain more of the piano
framing her.
- In rendering it, the primary subject is a bit hot and should be
selected and toned
Hey Bob,
While I agree with Paul on using a proper camera bag to carry the
camera, there are times when I just want to put the camera and/or a
couple of lenses into your carry-on luggage for ease of transport
along with a small, folded flat shoulder bag for when I get to my
destination.
Exactly what i was thinking.
I like the single out of place flower.
Dave
On 4/1/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I like the soft blur in the foreground that takes your view to the sharp
center, and then falls off to a blur in the background.
Jim A.
I'm trying to decide
... But what would have happened if you forgot to bring film for the
MX too?
]'-)
I'd push the values on the piano's harp well down , but would not
want to lose them as context.
G
On Apr 1, 2007, at 6:29 AM, Bong Manayon wrote:
Alastair, I thought about the crop too, you're right it
Nice shot.
Dave
PS she's probably rabid thats why she was so good for you.
vbg
Dave
On 4/1/07, Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Shot while wandering around today. I'd like to think I was a great
tracker or something, but this one was not overly timid. I was able
to approach a
Don't worry, its happened to me and i'm sure a few others to.:-)
Like this one a lot. Good angles and i like the reflection
Dave Brooks
On 3/31/07, Bong Manayon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was supposed to cover a friend's recital in and in a case of
overpreparedness I made sure to download
Very well done.
It looks like a great spot
Dave
On 4/1/07, J and K Messervy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is a 30 (!) shot panorama (5 rows of 6 shots). Each shot was taken at
55mm focal length and the stitched image was a little over 1gb and
equivalent to 123 megapixels! This has been
As far as I'm aware, all Enhanced Matte paper has a coated surface. I
don't understand the distinction on the Epson Canada website ... The
links on that page take you to the same Enhanced Matte page. Probably
just some marketing weenie listing the same paper in two places.
G
On Apr 1,
On Mar 31, 2007, at 9:43 PM, Bruce Dayton wrote:
I'm trying to decide what I think of this shot. I would appreciate
your opinions on it.
Pentax K10D, Sigma 100-300/4 EX @ 110mm, Handheld
ISO 280, 1/250 sec @ f/8
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_4616.htm
Doesn't do much for me, Bruce. I
Quite possible, Thanks
Dave
On 4/1/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As far as I'm aware, all Enhanced Matte paper has a coated surface. I
don't understand the distinction on the Epson Canada website ... The
links on that page take you to the same Enhanced Matte page. Probably
On Sun, 1 Apr 2007, J and K Messervy wrote:
This is a 30 (!) shot panorama (5 rows of 6 shots). Each shot was taken at
55mm focal length and the stitched image was a little over 1gb and
equivalent to 123 megapixels! This has been heavily resized obviously but
I'll be printing this about
On 3/26/07, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Tom C
Subject: Re: PESO - Flow
Yeah, I just hate having to carry multiple filters and stop to put one on,
make sure it's clean, and then take it back off, when had I been shooting
Velvia I wouldn't
I prefer the shaprpened version FWIW.
Dave
On 3/26/07, Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5774291
Tom C.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
--
Equine Photography
Quess i was not fast enough to see it.
Dave
On 4/1/07, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Markus. BTW, this photo will soon disappear. It's a limited
engagement:-).
Paul
On Apr 1, 2007, at 5:18 AM, Markus Maurer wrote:
It's not the first time I notice that you have an eye for
I hope Bill does'nt mind the GFM group photo with the D200 this year.:-)
Dave
On 3/26/07, Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah, I just hate having to carry multiple filters and stop
to put one on,
make sure it's clean, and then take it back off, when had I
been shooting
Velvia I
I suppose they have a smashing success rate when the do get there.:-)
DaveB
On 3/31/07, Ralf R. Radermacher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's what happens when the fire brigade tries to be faster than the
laws of physics allow:
http://www.fotocommunity.de/pc/pc/mypics/770012/display/8452280
Very nice.
Dave
On 4/1/07, Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Out roaming today, found several of these little fellows. Took
several shots of this pair, but like this one best.
Pentax K10D, Tamron 90/2.8 AF macro, handheld
ISO 100, 1/250 sec @ f/6.7
In a message dated 3/31/2007 3:56:57 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi Pentaxians
Franz Carl Weber is the most famous and oldest toy seller in the old city
part of Zurich at the Rennweg near Bahnhofstrasse.
I saw some days ago that they have a toy museum but was to
In a message dated 3/31/2007 2:42:29 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi Pentaxians
This welder did not take notice of me so I could use the Pentax A50mm macro
from about 2 meters distance here.
Early in the morning at 2 o'clock after computer work on my way home in the
Am considering a long range flash snoot for bird (wildlife) use.
I've gone to Google and a couple of the more dependable photo houses
and am surprised at the lack of information.
Anyone have a source I could check?
Thanks,
Jack
In a message dated 3/31/2007 9:41:49 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Out roaming today, found several of these little fellows. Took
several shots of this pair, but like this one best.
Pentax K10D, Tamron 90/2.8 AF macro, handheld
ISO 100, 1/250 sec @ f/6.7
In a message dated 3/31/2007 6:33:45 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
One of the benefits of working from home is that I get to take Grace
to the park quite often. One of the benefits of taking Grace to the
park is that I get to talk to all the moms. Last week, Grace
In a message dated 3/31/2007 3:40:10 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
That's what happens when the fire brigade tries to be faster than the
laws of physics allow:
http://www.fotocommunity.de/pc/pc/mypics/770012/display/8452280
Freehand shot across the river Meuse with a
In a message dated 3/31/2007 9:46:35 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Shot while wandering around today. I'd like to think I was a great
tracker or something, but this one was not overly timid. I was able
to approach a reasonable distance before she took off.
Pentax
It's really too bad that the web can't even begin to do it justice.
I'm wondering if you can at least present a relatively large 1200X800
or so image size to help a bit. I would love to see the real thing
once it is printed, but alas, I'm a little far away.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Sunday,
In a message dated 3/31/2007 9:46:03 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm trying to decide what I think of this shot. I would appreciate
your opinions on it.
Pentax K10D, Sigma 100-300/4 EX @ 110mm, Handheld
ISO 280, 1/250 sec @ f/8
Search for flash extenders, such as the Flash. X-Tender from Kirk
http://www.kirkphoto.com/brackets.html
...or this one which is similar:
http://www.synvis.com/FlashXtender.htm
Snoots are a type of flash modifier typically used in the studio.
Cheers,
Dave
On 4/1/07, Jack Davis [EMAIL
In a message dated 3/31/2007 10:02:15 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This is the full frame shot. I rather like it in context and how it
turned out rather than a hefty crop to show just the bird. What I
like is how the bushes he is perched on are in the plane of focus
In a message dated 4/1/2007 3:29:27 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This is a 30 (!) shot panorama (5 rows of 6 shots). Each shot was taken at
55mm focal length and the stitched image was a little over 1gb and
equivalent to 123 megapixels! This has been heavily
In a message dated 4/1/2007 7:13:33 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5794876
Looking around for some things to use on another forum and came acroos this
one.
Last October on the drive home from Thansgiving weekend. Small falls
On 4/2/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 4/1/2007 3:29:27 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This is a 30 (!) shot panorama (5 rows of 6 shots). Each shot was taken at
55mm focal length and the stitched image was a little over 1gb and
What I like is how the perspective draws your eye right up to the
falls. What I don't like so well is there is just too much foreground
water - I would crop about 1/2 to 2/3 away. Right now the falls are
just not dominant enough. After the crop, I'd like to see it again.
--
Bruce
Sunday,
In a message dated 3/31/2007 6:19:18 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi!
Three fourths down the way from our town to Beer Sheva (capital of Negev
desert region of Israel) there is this little nature reserve, called Pura.
Here is a gallery of shots I made today. I
On 4/1/07, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.kirkphoto.com/brackets.html
...or this one which is similar:
http://www.synvis.com/FlashXtender.htm
Doh!!, they're the same thing!!!
That's it, I'm going to bed.
Cheers,
Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
I saw a few of the advanced shooters in the GFM contest, use the Kirk extension.
Would you still use the flash at full power, to get your range, if
using a 300 or 400 lens, or is it a trial and error till you get your
settings worked out.
Dave
On 4/1/07, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5795165
A cropped version.
Dave
On 4/1/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 4/1/2007 7:13:33 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5794876
Looking around for
In a message dated 3/7/2007 12:02:41 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This is a rather large collection of photos taken on a half mile
stretch of suburban Detroit's Old Woodward Avenue. It will hopefully
end up as an eight to twelve shot gallery show and magazine
In a message dated 4/1/2007 8:34:10 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5795165
A cropped version.
Dave
==
Much better -- you don't need all that water in front that was in the
original shot.
Marnie aka Doe :-)
In a message dated 3/5/2007 4:47:20 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi.
This time a smaller GESO (sorry for the last one, too big, I know).
Finally I'm reviewing some photos taken with the *ist DL (in my 20
iMac, it is a pleasure) and found some interesting photos (for
Incredible snow crystals. Leaves me in awe. And not just of your
photography, which I am, but also of Mother Nature. When one sees how
something so small
and ethereal can still be so individual and unique, one just has to stand
back and applaud her work.
Marnie aka Doe ;-)
=
Google error? Heck!
Jack
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 3/5/2007 4:47:20 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi.
This time a smaller GESO (sorry for the last one, too big, I know).
Finally I'm reviewing some photos taken with the *ist DL (in my 20
Fri, 30 Mar 2007 14:30:41 -0800
William Robb wrote
- Original Message -
From: Mark Roberts
Subject: What the heck - Another PESO
Chateau Chambord
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/temp.htm
That's certainly crisp and dramatic.
I second that.
I remember that I had
Thanks, Marnie, I really appreciate your comment. Obviously those atta
boy or otherwise praising comments do less good than constructive
criticism. I mean, if I produce a good photo and everyone is telling me
it is good, it is, hmmm, well, I already knew that ;-).
So to what you said. Please
Walter, all I can tell you is that it *looks* like land of milk and
honey. You kind of answered yourself by pointing out the shot you liked
most ;-).
Thanks!
Boris
Walter Hamler wrote:
Boris, it is indeed a land of milk and honey !
I like the last one of the crushed water bottle and parched
In a message dated 3/31/2007 11:29:03 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I went to the 2007 West Palm Beach Barrett-Jackson
Collector Car Auction Event yesterday 3/30/2007.
Incredible cars all over the place. Of course I
took a bunch of photos. If your into vintage cars,
Thanks, Kenneth. In fact, after this shot I realized that I want a 100
mm macro lens, probably newest DFA variety 'cause it is lightest and
smallest and because it has standard 49 mm filter thread. Having that
wide enablement suggestion by Cotty from earlier work I presented makes
me think
LOL, Hope you slept well.
I took a squint at the Kirk offerings. Would be nice to know which
model would fit on the AF-540..which I'm fixin' to order.
Anyone using that combination?
Jack
--- David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/1/07, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think its a nice gallery to look at Godfrey. I like the mannequins!.
BTW, it sounds like LR does a similar set up for its web page as in
PS, with the 3 subdirectories. To set that up, would one great the
main directory on the site, then download all the sub folders to that,
then change the
In a message dated 4/1/2007 9:26:47 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
For starters, I don't normally control the time of day when my family
goes for a walk. All I can control is what kind of stuff I load to my
photo bag and as of now - do I take or do I leave behind my
In a message dated 3/31/2007 2:28:11 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ran across this little web-app and found it quite fascinating. It is
a little interactive demonstration of the scale of the Universe and
things in it. Brought to you be the good folks at Nikon:
I see there is one for my SB80DX. :-)
Dave
On 4/1/07, Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
LOL, Hope you slept well.
I took a squint at the Kirk offerings. Would be nice to know which
model would fit on the AF-540..which I'm fixin' to order.
Anyone using that combination?
Jack
--- David
Much better. It is not a 'blow me away' scene, but is very nice and
pleasant to look at. This crop works well for me. Nice job.
--
Bruce
Sunday, April 1, 2007, 8:29:47 AM, you wrote:
DJB http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5795165
DJB A cropped version.
DJB Dave
DJB On 4/1/07,
Thanks Bruce.
This was the second so so year for colours up here, and i just
stumbled across this on the way home.I took a slightly different
route.
Apperently the weekend before was very good, then a huge windstorm
blew through md week and down they came.:-)
Dave
Dave
On 4/1/07, Bruce Dayton
At least no spiders.LOL
Dave
On 4/1/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 3/31/2007 9:41:49 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Out roaming today, found several of these little fellows. Took
several shots of this pair, but like this one best.
From:
Jack Davis
Am considering a long range flash snoot for bird (wildlife) use.
I've gone to Google and a couple of the more dependable photo houses
and am surprised at the lack of information.
Anyone have a source I could check?
Thanks,
Jack
Google Better Beamer
--
PDML
Small bags like Slingshot 100AW might be of interst to you, Bob.
2007/4/1, Bob Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Paul,
It's my fault, but a camera case for the digitals is a problem. I'd
like a bottom half case like I use on the LX, but they would cover the
screen. So here I am...
Regards, Bob
that looks like a '56 chevy, not a ford, and in turquoise,
not power blue. ( At least it brought back the memories for you!).
jco
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, April 01, 2007 12:25 PM
To: pdml@pdml.net
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 3/30/2007 8:32:57 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Tu is definitely Spanish ...
Shel
==
What people aren't getting, and I was going to let it go but won't now. Is
that it is MUCH more likely a young
That makes sense. I was unaware of that product. When I get a job,
I'll have to look into it:-). I have a good lead btw. Wish me well,
burn incense, recite incantations, pray, or do anything else that you
think might help.
On Apr 1, 2007, at 10:04 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Hey Bob,
While testing the new Manfrotto-393 and monopod with
the 300mm f/2.8 I witnessed another Grebe fish meal:
http://www.dfsee.com/gallery/index.php?id=217
It was shot using this setup (on a monopod):
http://merlin/gallery/index.php?id=1314
Comments welcome!
Regards, JvW
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Paul Stenquist
Subject: Re: Final Four questions?
He didn't want to be seen as basquing in reflected glory.
That/s a sheep shot.
Are ewe starting another pun thread?
That would be basquing for it.
--
PDML
Thank you for looking. I've saved your message. That's great input.
You are special!
Paul
On Apr 1, 2007, at 11:38 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 3/7/2007 12:02:41 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This is a rather large collection of photos taken on a
Maybe it meant nothing more than a chance to be provocative.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 3/30/2007 4:48:55 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It's a gal thing.
I suspect it's a religious thing ...
===
That could be. Good point.
On 4/1/07, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That makes sense. I was unaware of that product. When I get a job,
I'll have to look into it:-). I have a good lead btw. Wish me well,
burn incense, recite incantations, pray, or do anything else that you
think might help.
As luck would have
As i only converted 1 picture on the mac last month with LR, i now
see, after attempting several on the PC today, that there is a bit of
a learning curve here.:-)
Practise, practise.g
It didi a good job on a scanned print of humming birds done a few
years ago. Managed to get rid of the casting
Just ordered the Kirk FX-1
Jack
--- John Sessoms [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From:
Jack Davis
Am considering a long range flash snoot for bird (wildlife) use.
I've gone to Google and a couple of the more dependable photo
houses
and am surprised at the lack of information.
Anyone have
On 3/30/07, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
William Robb wrote:
From: Mark Roberts
Chateau Chambord
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/temp.htm
That's certainly crisp and dramatic.
Just as an experiment, I tried doing a perspective correction on this
image in Photoshop and it
Street musician shots are great. I really like same hairdresser for
some reason.:-)
I can relate to big guys big drinks.
Dave
On 4/1/07, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thank you for looking. I've saved your message. That's great input.
You are special!
Paul
On Apr 1, 2007, at 11:38
It's a numbers game. Step one, get a free web account, step two get a
free email accounts. For each 10,000 scam e-mails expect between .01 to
.1 % positive responses. Repeat step one and two after the ISP shuts
you down. If everything is free except for the labor you only have to
be
1 - 100 of 210 matches
Mail list logo
