Well, I would love to get this myself as it strikes me as another
can't-miss deal. Unfortunately, I'm strapped and already put the money
I could used toward my M-50/2. But, I figured someone on the list might
be interested.
shipping via
USPS.
(sob!)
On 11/29/2010 12:02 PM, Walter Gilbert wrote:
Well, I would love to get this myself as it strikes me as another
can't-miss deal. Unfortunately, I'm strapped and already put the
money I could used toward my M-50/2. But, I figured someone on the
list might be interested
batteries.
1- clear filter for the 135mm or 50mm lens.
1- original (OEM) neck strap, never used. (did anyone ever use these?)
1- original Asahi Pentax K-1000 users manual, in very good condition
1- camera bag, green/brown.
On 11/29/2010 12:02 PM, Walter Gilbert wrote:
Well, I would love to get
Boy, does that bring back some childhood memories. I pretty much grew
up on naval bases and got to see those guys fairly regularly. It's one
of the more thrilling spectacles I've ever seen.
And, a great shot of the action besides. It certainly makes me wish I'd
been there.
-- Walt
On
Cool find, Nick.
Just so you'll know, I went and bought a roll of film today, and a
battery for the exposure meter.
All they had was Fuji Superia X-tra 400 (it was a Dollar General
Store). I'll shoot through it, get it processed at Sam's Club, and see
how I like it. Then, I'll probably
Hi all,
I just got an email from the senior editor of a publishing house
(Hachette Book Group in NY) stating some interest in possibly using some
of the photos I took at the local political rallies at the end of
October. She wrote asking for copies of three particular images, with
the
less. In any case, specify usage as
first North American rights. That way you retain ownership and can sell them
again if someone else sees them and wants to use them.
Paul
On Nov 30, 2010, at 5:01 PM, Walter Gilbert wrote:
Hi all,
I just got an email from the senior editor of a publishing house
Thanks for all the advice, y'all.
I went ahead with the price Paul suggested for the simple fact that the
images they mentioned weren't all that unique and similar ones could
be found if needed. They were simple pictures of signs being held up by
rally attendees that didn't require any
Thanks, Godfrey. That's something I'll definitely have to file away
for future reference.
But, I suspect the type of photographs you've sold for books would be of
a different sort than the ones they've expressed interest in -- which is
to say that the images themselves were of a
That's an interesting distinction in that the shots they're
interested in would probably best fit in the news/journalism genre, even
though they're being used in a book. There is definitely a timeliness
to them, but no relative rarity at all. In fact, they could undoubtedly
get on the
Oh, yeah. Given the prices on textbooks, I'd say the production
budget is a fairly secondary consideration. You probably should have
started out in the high six figures.
-- Walt
On 12/1/2010 8:46 AM, Charles Robinson wrote:
On Nov 30, 2010, at 18:57, paul stenquist wrote:
The ASMP is a
I feel pretty comfortable at $50-per. I don't think it's enough to
scare them off even if it is higher than they're willing to pay.
And, hey ... you never know. They could develop a conscience and
negotiate upward! ;-)
On 12/1/2010 8:58 AM, David J Brooks wrote:
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010
Hmm ... $335 a year.
At the moment, it's a bit beyond my range. I think I'd be better off
putting that money toward a car for the time being.
But, now I know what happened to Annie Leibovitz.
-- Walt
On 12/1/2010 9:18 AM, Mark Roberts wrote:
paul stenquist wrote:
On Nov 30, 2010, at
Great to hear, Stan!
Hope the recovery goes smoothly, and your first follow-up is the only one.
See if you can parlay this ordeal into the royal treatment for a couple
of days, or so.
-- Walt
On 12/1/2010 8:08 PM, Stan Halpin wrote:
Thanks Miserere and all. I am back, sorta.
My
OK ... now that you've gotten me to try my hand at film
photography, I need a scanner. Well, I have one now ... sort of.
I've managed to inherit an HP Scanjet G3110, which does have a
transparency carrier. Problem is, everything I've read about it says
it's not very good at scanning
Thanks for that info, Nick! Very helpful.
I've found out that my local camera shop carries a decent variety of b/w
film supplies and develops for a pretty reasonable price.
Maybe at some point, I'll get into developing my own film -- starting
out with one of those cans.
Thanks again.
Happy Hannukah to you as well, Boris -- along with any other list
members celebrating.
-- Walt
On 12/2/2010 1:34 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
Hi!
http://pentax-ways.blogspot.com/2010/12/peso-2010-57-happy-hannukah.html
Have a great year end holiday season, everyone!
Boris
--
PDML
I've used my Promaster 7-element 2X teleconverter with my 50-200mm
kit lens to shoot birds and gotten *decent* results as long as the birds
cooperated and as long as I stayed away from the farthest reaches of the
lens. Of course, the maximum aperture on the 50-200 is f/4, so I
couldn't
On 12/2/2010 1:37 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Ken Waller wrote:
From: Mark Robertsm...@robertstech.com
Cotty wrote:
But you're right on the money with regards to the puns.
he's shilling...
Bob said pensively.
When it comes to puns, no quarter is asked or given, and I'm
not one to buck the
Speaking of which, do TC's have as noticeable an impact on IQ when
used on film bodies as they do on DSLRs?
-- Walt
On 12/2/2010 4:28 PM, Miserere wrote:
On 2 December 2010 15:53, J.C. O'Connellhifis...@gate.net wrote:
FWIW, I have refrained from using TCs because
of the simple fact
Duly noted, and much appreciated.
-- Walt
On 12/2/2010 4:39 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
Yes!
Jack
--- On Thu, 12/2/10, Walter Gilbertldott...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Walter Gilbertldott...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Teleconverters?
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail Listpdml@pdml.net
Date: Thursday,
Hi all,
Being not particularly mathematically inclined (to put it very
charitably), I was wondering if any of you could point me toward a sort
of online idiot's guide to understanding and calculating exposure
values, depth of field, and other basics along those lines. I figure
having at
Thanks, Ecke ... that will be helpful down the road, no doubt.
I guess what I'm looking for is a combination of both. Nothing overly
scientific -- like down to the atomic level, or anything.
Maybe if I can explain the way I've grasped the concept of the effect of
aperture size on depth
On 12/2/2010 6:52 PM, eckinator wrote:
I'm at a bit of a loss for a better
imagebut the general idea is that closing the aperture cuts out the
stray rays so to say
Hmm ... it alleviates photon overcrowding, in a sense.
dang... tell them that after a while it becomes intuitive knowledge
and
. Much of it will benefit you in digital photography
as well. The principles of light and exposure are the same, even though the medium is different.
Paul
On Dec 2, 2010, at 7:01 PM, Walter Gilbert wrote:
Hi all,
Being not particularly mathematically inclined (to put it very charitably), I
Thanks for that info, Godders.
I just about betcha five bucks the local used book store has a copy of
Basic Photography on the cheap, and have already bookmarked the
photo.net page. I'll send them an email telling them to go to hell as
soon as I finish reading it all. ;-)
-- Walt
On
Great shots, and great story, Larry!
And, I now have a ready explanation for when people inevitably ask me,
Why are you always carrying a camera around?
-- Walt
On 12/2/2010 7:50 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
I don't *only* photograph mushrooms. Yesterday as I was leaving Costco I
noticed the
This sort of reminds me of the ongoing dispute here in the US
between Kentucky and Illinois. Abraham Lincoln was born in Kentucky,
but spent most of his life and political career in Illinois. Illinois
claims to be the Land of Lincoln ... but, we still have his old log
cabin birthplace
Hi all,
In my absence from the list -- which, to the extent it was noticed, must
have been greatly appreciated -- I've managed to procure a few goodies
for a not-bad price, I think, but thought I'd get the opinions of folks
more knowledgeable than myself. I actually got a whole bunch of
Wow, Christine!
I was fortunate enough to fall just south of the line of weather. I
can't even imagine what a mess you folks are going to be dealing with up
there! I tell you one thing, though . . . I'm sure glad I don't work in
Allstate homeowners claims anymore. My old co-workers are
, Walter Gilbert wrote:
It's just that the printing around the front
element is ever-so-slightly different from what I've seen in images of
the same lens around the web. The imprint says:
ASAHI OPT. CO., JAPAN -- Pentax SMC M-50/1.4 -- 1093350
don't know what it means but mine reads literally
6619065
[mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
Walter Gilbert
Sent: 02 February 2011 23:42
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Re-emerging, announcing enablement
Oops! I botched some cut n' pasting when I was editing the original
message for clarity -- as is typical.
Mine actually says:
1093350
to a collector.
stan
On Feb 2, 2011, at 6:24 PM, Walter Gilbert wrote:
Hi all,
In my absence from the list -- which, to the extent it was noticed, must have
been greatly appreciated -- I've managed to procure a few goodies for a not-bad
price, I think, but thought I'd get the opinions of folks more
Actually a K 50/1.2 -- as, apparently, they didn't make an M 1.2. ;-)
On 2/2/2011 7:02 PM, Walter Gilbert wrote:
All I can say is I plan to go back very soon and inquire as to whether
or not they might have an old M 50/1.2 lying around.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
enablement. Now go take some pictures! :-) Cheers,
Christine
- Original Message - From: Walter Gilbert ldott...@gmail.com
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2011 5:24 PM
Subject: Re-emerging, announcing enablement
Hi all,
In my absence from
I think I've determined that it's an old Vivitar.
On 2/2/2011 8:06 PM, Walter Gilbert wrote:
Does this thing look familiar at all to anyone?
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link
Happened to me at Walmart ... and then the lady said, You must have
some camera!
Not sure how to reconcile that.
-- Walt
On 2/2/2011 8:42 PM, David Parsons wrote:
It's happened to me at Ritz and Walgreens a couple of times. I take
it as a compliment that they think my photography is that
Ha! Indeed.
Can you imagine how nice Eric Clapton's guitars must be?
On 2/2/2011 9:25 PM, Steven Desjardins wrote:
Think of it like cooking with really nice pans. . .
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the
Thanks, Boris. :-)
I'm looking forward to getting out and doing some shooting ASAP. I just
haven't had many opportunities to do any fun shooting.
Perhaps this weekend.
-- Walt
On 2/2/2011 11:46 PM, Boris Liberman wrote:
On 2/3/2011 3:28 AM, Christine Aguila wrote:
Sounds like good
yet, but maybe someday soon.
-- Walt
On 2/3/2011 12:10 AM, Christine Aguila wrote:
Can't say I recognize the last lens. Cheers, Christine
- Original Message - From: Walter Gilbert ldott...@gmail.com
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2011 8:06 PM
more of the details. It was fascinating to
listen to the guy talk about it, but he jumped from one tangent to the
next, and it was hard to keep track of it all. I'm looking forward to
going back to talk to the guy again, though.
-- Walt
On 2/4/2011 2:21 PM, John Sessoms wrote:
From: Walter
I like that shot a lot. Nice.
-- Walt
On 2/5/2011 2:23 PM, Toine wrote:
Spring is knocking on my door:
http://www.repiuk.nl/index.php/blog-mainmenu-97/159-snowdrops
K20D SMC F28/2.8 (which is a little gem)
Toine
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
I didn't analyze it quite so deeply, but after reading Darren's
elucidation, I have to agree.
My first impression upon looking at it was that it's a very arresting
shot. I've definitely seen worse ones -- especially taken by myself.
I would definitely consider it a keeper.
-- Walt
On
Another very nice shot, Frank! I love the geometry of it, as well as
the isolated blues amid the greys.
I wish you'd stick to black and white and leave the color stuff to those
of us for whom it's a primary focus, dammit.
-- Walt
On 2/5/2011 8:19 PM, frank theriault wrote:
The University
Hi all,
I thought I'd take the Pentaxes out after a little overnight snowfall
and risk drawing the ire of those who have seen quite enough snow for
the year thank-you-very-much.
I fumbled the focusing on the K 50/1.4 on quite a few of the shots I
took, unfortunately. It's going to take
Thanks for the tip, Bruce. It is much appreciated.
I'd forgotten that I had changed my settings over to JPEG while I was
taking snapshots during the Super Bowl gathering I went to last night.
I have a horrible habit of treating my camera like a point-and-shoot
sometimes, and being
Ha! Small world, indeed!
Nice to make your acquaintance, Collin.
Don't believe a word our mutual acquaintance tells you about me, except
the non-incriminating stuff.
-- Walt
On 2/7/2011 6:55 PM, Collin Brendemuehl wrote:
And a facebook friend
links to some quite nice bw shots.
Shot
Thanks, Ann. :-)
He was standing guard for the horse in that previous shot, so he had to
come and check me out and make sure I wasn't up to no good. He was
pretty friendly once he figured out I wasn't there to cause trouble, though.
I shot those with the digital K-x. I have a K1000
with a
totally-manual SLR will be at least a little bit more satisfying than
capturing the same shot in pixels, if only for the challenge.
But, that's just how I roll. :-)
-- Walt
On 2/7/2011 8:20 PM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
Walter Gilbert wrote:
Thanks, Ann. :-)
He was standing guard
I've used canned air a couple of times, though I'm a little more leery
of it than Bill R., mainly because I'm a tad paranoid about the idea of
a freak propellant discharge.
Usually, I use one of those nasal bulb aspirators (http://is.gd/l6xxr3)
with a small hole punched in the back and a pet
Thanks, Jack!
I know a lot of people just don't like vignetting as a general rule.
I'm not crazy about it in most cases, but I do like using it from time
to time -- but almost exclusively in b/w shots. I do try to use it
sparingly -- as soft as possible. But, I can see where some find
Thanks, David! Glad you liked the barn shots. It's a distinctive
old hulk, to be sure.
I actually considered using the RAW + JPG setting, but I only had a 2
Gig card in the camera at the time, and figured most of the shots were
just going to be throw-aways. So, I figured I'd just take
This time, it was indeed intentional. ;-)
From the north-side angle of the barn shots, the sky was a very flat,
bland mass of strato-cumulus cloud cover, so I figured a little bit of
vignette would add a touch of drama and bring out the highlights in the
barn lumber. I just went ahead
I hadn't really thought about that, but you do have a point. :-)
As Pee Wee Herman would say, I meant to do that.
-- Walt
On 2/8/2011 11:11 AM, Jack Davis wrote:
It, also, suits the photo trend back when that barn was new.
Jack
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On 2/8/2011 11:01 AM, Don Guthrie wrote:
Walt I love the contrast and look of these photos. Especially # 2 3
(dog barn)
The 1st one with the horse caught my eye but it maybe need a tighter
crop or maybe would look great in a 4 ft blow up
Tramping around in the snow and cold is tiring the
Wow, Jack! Love the red tail hawk shot! Both are very nicely done,
but that hawk shot makes me want to filter your posts.
-- Walt
On 2/8/2011 10:27 AM, Jack Davis wrote:
Yesterday:
http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=566
Agreed.
PENTAX: The camera for those with champagne taste and a beer pocketbook.
-- Walt
On 2/8/2011 12:48 PM, David J Brooks wrote:
PDML and beer. Its a natural pairing.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from
Late to the party and replying out of sequence, myself. Apologies
for any confusion this may cause, but I was receiving the list in digest
form for a while, until a few days ago. So, I wasn't able to pull up
the original message in the thread.
Whenever I go on a photo walk, I generally
So, I now have this K1000 and a decent array of lenses to use on it.
Having finally figured out how to properly operate the camera after
wasting one roll of Fuji Superia X-tra 400 due to the fact that I opened
the back of the camera prematurely thinking I had it completely wound
(didn't
used UltraMax, so can't help you there!
HTH
John Coyle
Brisbane, Australia
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
Walter Gilbert
Sent: Wednesday, 9 February 2011 2:23 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Advice solicitation
it a
shot and see, though.
Thanks for the heads-up, nonetheless!
Best,
Walt
On 2/9/2011 1:29 PM, John Sessoms wrote:
From: Walter Gilbert
So, I now have this K1000 and a decent array of lenses to use on it.
Having finally figured out how to properly operate the camera after
wasting one roll
Good news. Thanks, Charles!
-- Walt
On 2/9/2011 4:39 PM, Charles Robinson wrote:
On Feb 9, 2011, at 15:55, Walter Gilbert wrote:
BTW -- I did note that the date stamp on the Plus-X box is 01/2010. I assume
that's the expiration date and not the date of manufacture. With that in mind
Thanks for the tips, David!
As for prints from the 400CN, I'll probably just have negatives made,
then scan them at home. Any prints will come from the digital scans,
which I assume will help produce less-funky results.
I've looked around Flickr at scans made from UltraMax and, from what
Thanks for the exposure and print tips, Collin. I'll archive this
email for future reference, too.
I've got an ideal place to set up a dark room out in my shop if I ever
get that seriously involved in film photography. It'll take some minor
construction to keep light out control the
Or a fry-cook at The Happy Gizzard.
On 2/9/2011 4:57 PM, Collin Brendemuehl wrote:
What should those of us that made it to grade 7 do then
If you've made it past the 6th grade then you should consider becoming a brain
surgeon or a double-naught spy.
Sincerely,
Collin Brendemuehl
Thanks, John!
I put all of my film in the freezer as soon as I got home, since I'm
just not sure how often I'll use it. Whenever I get ready to use it,
I'll pull it out and stick it in a zip lock bag with a little silica gel
pouch overnight to keep any condensation from getting to it.
Dammit! I knew I was forgetting something last time I left the camera
shop! Been meaning to get one of those for a while.
I've clearly got a lot to learn, and appreciate all the help everyone's
giving me.
Thanks, Paul.
On 2/9/2011 8:34 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
If the scene you're
Thanks for the explanation, Collin.
When Paul said to overexpose, I was actually thinking it sounded
counter-intuitive -- that you'd want to under-expose in a snowy
situation. But, it makes sense now that you explained that the meter
assumes a neutral grey.
So, I'm assuming that in
do appreciate your patience.
-- Walt
On 2/9/2011 9:18 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
On Feb 9, 2011, at 10:05 PM, Walter Gilbert wrote:
Thanks for the explanation, Collin.
When Paul said to overexpose, I was actually thinking it sounded counter-intuitive --
that you'd want to under-expose
All great shots, Ann -- but that first one is just completely enchanting.
Wonderful!
-- Walt
On 2/8/2011 11:55 PM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/home#section=ARTISTsubSection=272221subSubSection=0language=EN
all three bw from the early 80's and scanned from
no substitute for experience. Again
when it comes to nailing exposures in difficult situations, the gray card or
incident meter is the easy way out.
Paul
On Feb 9, 2011, at 11:19 PM, Walter Gilbert wrote:
Thanks, David/Collin/Paul.
I think I understand, now.
I was thinking that since
Very cool, Bob!
I've seen two large hawks near near my home within the past several
months, but haven't even come close to getting a decent shot of one.
It's getting a little frustrating, I must say.
-- Walt
On 2/9/2011 10:01 PM, Bob Sullivan wrote:
Found these guys today, just
Thanks for the tips, John!
I'll give those a try this evening and see what I come up with.
-- Walt
On 2/10/2011 9:31 AM, John Sessoms wrote:
From: Walter Gilbert
Thanks, David/Collin/Paul.
I think I understand, now.
I was thinking that since the snow was so glaringly bright
Ha!
The most reliable of all appendages.
On 2/10/2011 1:25 PM, John Sessoms wrote:
From: David Parsons
The palm of your hand is also reasonably close to 18% as well.
Unless you have really dark hair. ;-D
-
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version:
I guess I'm going to have to get a suit made out of chicken meat,
or something. All I ever get are shots of the kind of birds that crap
on cars.
-- Walt
On 2/12/2011 6:30 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
Thanka, Steven! Nice comment.
Jack
--- On Sat, 2/12/11, Steven Desjardinsdrd1...@gmail.com
Oh ... I ... uh.
I just don't know what to say. At all.
But, yeah ... that's about what I envisioned in a suit made of chicken
meat. So, at least I know where to get one if I ever actually go
through with it.
Wow.
-- Walt
On 2/13/2011 4:14 PM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
Or he could
Ann ... maybe you should explain to Pinar that when people speak of
suffering for one's art, they're talking about the artist ... not
everyone the artist knows!
But, hey. As long as they spell your name right, huh?
-- Walt
On 2/13/2011 8:49 PM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
Walter Gilbert
Hi all,
We had an unseasonably warm day here in western Kentucky, so I thought
I'd take the cameras out and see what I came up with. I filled up a
roll of Plus-X 125 on the K1000 using my 135/2.5 and will have them
developed soon. On my K-x, I used my K-50/1.4 -- everything shot at
f/16
to warm up. Thank
goodness
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
Walter Gilbert
Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2011 8:39 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: GESO: Photo walk on a warm February day
Hi all,
We had
] On Behalf Of
Walter Gilbert
Sent: Thursday, 17 February 2011 12:39 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: GESO: Photo walk on a warm February day
Hi all,
We had an unseasonably warm day here in western Kentucky, so I thought I'd
take the cameras out and see what I came up with. I filled up
[mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
Walter Gilbert
Sent: Thursday, 17 February 2011 12:39 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: GESO: Photo walk on a warm February day
Hi all,
We had an unseasonably warm day here in western Kentucky, so I thought I'd
take the cameras out and see what
I'm using an older version of full-blown Photoshop -- 7.0 to be
exact -- and have been meaning to take in some tutorials on YouTube for
a while, but just haven't gotten around to it. A lot of the reason I
haven't gotten too deeply into the post-production end of it has to do
with the
Thank you, Frank!
I was pretty smitten with the pickup, too. I wish I'd been able to get
more angles on it, but it was parked right up against the side of a
garage with a bunch of newer vehicles in the background. So, I was
forced to do what I could to obscure all the other junk -- which
in Firefox...
I just couldnt get a really good view. might be that when I made the
images smaller the arrows to go to the next photo
disappeared.
I like the genre, for sure.
ann
Walter Gilbert wrote:
Thank you, Frank!
I was pretty smitten with the pickup, too. I wish I'd been able to
get more
Don't tell anyone on the list that I said this, but they are all
*AWESOME!*
-- Walt
On 2/17/2011 10:23 AM, John Sessoms wrote:
Where in Western Kentucky?
My mom's family is from the area around Fredonia, KY.
-
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Wow, Ann! I'd never even heard of the majority of those animals.
Not a bad shot in the bunch, obviously -- but that Nicobar Pigeon was my
favorite. I've never seen anything quite like it, and you captured the
colors beautifully!
-- Walt
On 2/17/2011 5:32 PM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
Hi all,
So, I've been getting a lot of soft images lately when using my K-x with
the K-50/1.4 and wondering what I'm doing wrong. Well, I think I've
figured it out.
I took a good look at the viewfinder glass and discovered that it's not
in good shape. I don't know if the sweat from using
Hey, Doug ... have you ever played against a guy named Eddie Moore
out of Paducah, KY by any chance?
-- Walt
On 2/17/2011 11:24 PM, Doug Franklin wrote:
On 2011-02-17 23:00, Paul Stenquist wrote:
This is an eight week annual eight-ball tournament
Ahhh, that puts a bit of a different
up a stick a couple of times since then, but I just don't enjoy it at
all anymore.
Anyhoo ... just thought I'd ask.
-- Walt
On 2/18/2011 12:07 AM, Doug Franklin wrote:
On 2011-02-18 0:39, Walter Gilbert wrote:
Hey, Doug ... have you ever played against a guy named Eddie Moore out
of Paducah
Thank for that info, Robert!
It looks like the process of swapping it out might be a little more
intensive than I'd hoped. I'll just have to learn to deal with it for
the time being, I guess. But, if it gets bad enough, I'll just have to
give in and take it into the shop. Maybe the guy
Yikes, Larry!
That is some frightful-looking damage!
I'll let you know if I come up with something. So far, no luck.
-- Walt
On 2/18/2011 3:30 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
On Feb 17, 2011, at 9:36 PM, Walter Gilbert wrote:
Can somebody help me out here? I'm really hoping this is something I'll
Great song. It's a jukebox mainstay down at the local Eagle's Club.
:-)
On 2/19/2011 3:10 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
http://www.tagtele.com/videos/voir/36976
--
Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
I really would love to submit something this year, but all the shots
I've taken that I feel might be worthy of submission have been resized
down without preserving the orginals -- in order to save limited hard
drive space. :-\ It wasn't the smartest thing to do, obviously, but I
didn't
I know. ;-) I'm shopping for one as we speak -- looking around for
good deals at Newegg.com and BensBargains.net.
-- Walt
On 2/19/2011 3:34 PM, Bob Sullivan wrote:
Walter,
For the cost of buying and developing 5 rolls of film,
you can buy an external hard drive and save it all.
Regards,
FWIW -- I just bought a USB hard drive enclosure for a 500 GB hard
drive my brother gave me, but I couldn't use because it's a SATA drive
and my existing one is ATA, and my main board won't run both types at
the same time.
So, in about a week, my storage issues should be remedied for the
AND furthermore ...
I just ordered 2GB of PC3200 DDR 400MHz SDRAM from Newegg.com for
$54.00/free shipping.
Could I afford to do it? Nope. But, it's something I've needed to do
for a while, and it'll help speed up my workflow considerably. So, I
reckon it's an investment.
Gawd, I
but that will have to wait. Not sure for
certain but we probably have plenty of older ram around the house but with
newer systems they don't work as well as newer ram.
Jeffery
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
Walter Gilbert
Sent: Saturday
$20, so for $120
you get 2TB of external storage, and when you need more, you can buy another
SATA drive when the price has dropped to $25/TB.
On Feb 19, 2011, at 1:26 PM, Walter Gilbert wrote:
I really would love to submit something this year, but all the shots I've
taken that I feel might
Well, at least it wasn't rosbif.
-- Walt
On 2/19/2011 5:20 PM, Cotty wrote:
On 19/2/11, Paul Sorenson, discombobulated, unleashed:
And...as a subscriber, I get this -
This content is currently unavailable. The page you requested cannot
be displayed right now. It may be
How beautiful!
I've never seen almond blossoms before. Great work -- both of you!
-- Walt
On 2/19/2011 11:27 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
Hi!
The spring has come. Today we had first really warm day (like in +27C)
and so we went for a walk and we took pictures /grin/...
401 - 500 of 866 matches
Mail list logo
