> -Original Message-
> From: Kenneth Waller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
>
> Dear Tom,
> Ha, Ha, Ha,
> But seriously I saw it as a valid comment on a way to make money in
> photography.
I didn't say it was invalid, but the answer to the question "How do
you make money in photography?" isn
"tom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 1:51 AM
Subject: RE: Actually on-topic: writers ain't rich
> Dear Kenneth,
>
> That was a joke.
>
> Thank You,
>
> Tom
>
> > -Original Message-
> &
Dear Kenneth,
That was a joke.
Thank You,
Tom
> -Original Message-
> From: Kenneth Waller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 6:55 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Actually on-topic: writers ain't rich
>
>
> The seminar
The seminar attendees were mostly outdoor/nature photographers.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: "tom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 6:56 PM
Subject: RE: Actually on-topic: writers ain't rich
> > --
> -Original Message-
> From: Kenneth Waller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
>
> In a John Shaw seminar last spring in Michigan, he answered
> the question
> "How do you make money in photography? - by saying you need to write
> articles that contain your photos.
That or maybe shoot weddings.
PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 10:49 AM
Subject: Re: Actually on-topic: writers ain't rich
> Dan Scott explained:
> > On Sunday, January 26, 2003, at 01:57 AM, Mike Johnston wrote:
> > >> John Shaw st
Hi,
Monday, January 27, 2003, 7:07:11 PM, you wrote:
> C'mon Bob. You were spotted while surreptitiously wielding a camera in
> a secluded spaceobviously feigning interest in a beret clad geezer.
> The only plausible explanation is you were there on behalf of the
> detective agency her husban
On Sunday, January 26, 2003, at 05:34 PM, Bob Walkden wrote:
I had a couple mildly of amusing incidents this weekend. I was in a
very beautiful travel bookshop in London on Saturday, which is
illuminated from above by natural light streaming in through an
atrium. It's a lovely, old wood-panelle
Yea, ain't it the truth.
At 05:41 PM 1/26/2003 -0500, Ann wrote:
Boris Liberman wrote:
>
> Here's a story. Well, we did drive to Beer Sheva last weekend. Among
> other things I've taken my FA 50/1.7 with me to shoot some kids. So
> I've been shooting. One moment I've noticed kids were giving a c
Bob:
It's a good thing you're in London, rather than New York, or you would be dead
twice by now!
Bob Walkden wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > Don't complain, Boris. Over here, the moms pull out their celphone and call
> > the cops to complain about he pedophile taking pictures of they kids.
>
> I had a coupl
On Sunday, January 26, 2003, at 01:57 AM, Mike Johnston wrote:
John Shaw started his recent Austin workshop by innocently asking "How
many people here think I make money from my photographs?" ;-)
And...?
--Mike
He said he makes his living from his workshops, not his photos.
But I'm thi
Hi,
> Don't complain, Boris. Over here, the moms pull out their celphone and call
> the cops to complain about he pedophile taking pictures of they kids.
I had a couple mildly of amusing incidents this weekend. I was in a
very beautiful travel bookshop in London on Saturday, which is
illuminated
Boris Liberman wrote:
>
> Here's a story. Well, we did drive to Beer Sheva last weekend. Among
> other things I've taken my FA 50/1.7 with me to shoot some kids. So
> I've been shooting. One moment I've noticed kids were giving a certain
> dog something to drink. Hopefully the shot I managed would
d for
me.
Ciao,
Graywolf
http://pages.prodigy.net/graywolfphoto
- Original Message -
From: "Boris Liberman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, January 26, 2003 12:44 PM
Subject: Re: Actually on-topic: writers ain
Hi!
drn> Similarly, I know snap-shooters who think it's really neat that I
drn> can make the photos I do, but listening to them talk I get a
drn> distinct impression that they don't think they're *"allowed"* to
drn> _try_ to actually _compose_ a photo, because that, you see, would
drn> be *art*
Frank Theriault wrote:
> Funny the way society values things, eh?
In many, many ways.
> Many years ago, when I was a student, I worked at Canada's largest music
> store in Montreal. Other than me, virtually every employee was a musican
> "between gigs" - although the gap between gigs seemed to o
Well, since graduating from college in 1978, I've earned my living as a
technical writer, technical editor, or technical journalist. I haven't
earned a killing, but I've earned a living. It beats the $100 or so that I
receive for publishing a personal essay that took me 15 hours to write.
[EMAIL P
Funny the way society values things, eh?
I recall about 4 or 5 years ago, reading in a cycling magazine that the
average professional bike racer in the US makes $7000US per year. No wonder
they need day jobs!
Many years ago, when I was a student, I worked at Canada's largest music
store in Montr
"D. Glenn Arthur Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>It's a lot like the "real musicians have day jobs" bumper stickers
>I've seen.
Q: What's the difference between musician and a 16" pizza?
A: A 16" pizza can feed a family of four.
Mark Roberts,
Musician, photographer, pizza lover
Dan Scott related:
> On Saturday, January 25, 2003, at 01:28 PM, Mike Johnston wrote:
>> Re photography, some of you might be surprised to learn a) how many
>> famous photographers were actually independently wealthy, and b) how
>> many famous, important, or widely-known photographers were, or a
On Saturday, January 25, 2003, at 03:43 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
Peter Alling wrote:
I just checked the cost of subscrbing to the OED online, and it's
$550
PER ANNUM!
Ok if you're a professional writer.
No, not OK.
It's completely free over at the librarywhich is my preference.
On Saturday, January 25, 2003, at 01:28 PM, Mike Johnston wrote:
Re photography, some of you might be surprised to learn a) how many
famous
photographers were actually independently wealthy, and b) how many
famous,
important, or widely-known photographers were, or are, either poor, or
suffer
Oh. My error.
keith
Paul Stenquist wrote:
>
> Peter Alling wrote:
> >
>
> > > > I just checked the cost of subscrbing to the OED online, and it's $550
> > > > PER ANNUM!
> > > > Ok if you're a professional writer.
>
> No, not OK.
> I just checked the cost of subscrbing to the OED online, and it's $550
> PER ANNUM!
> Ok if you're a professional writer.
Whoa! If you're laboring under the delusion that most "professional writers"
can afford such a thing, disabuse thyself!
Writing is a particularly poor choice for making a d
24 matches
Mail list logo
