If it ain't black, I don't shoot it. I ain't goin' t'have a camera that so
rounded it looks like it was fashioned from a mold normally used to shape a
bar of soap either.
Regards,
Bob...
---
Beer is proof that God loves us
and wants us to be happy
Just noticed this scary bit on the DP Review web page:
In its quest for ever higher performance combined with compact
dimensions, PENTAX has been developing lenses compatible with the new
PENTAX digital SLR camera. PENTAX aims to launch these in fall 2003.
I suspect this means lenses with
Mark wrote:
I suspect this means lenses with less-than-full-frame coverage, made
specifically for the DSLR. Hope this doesn't affect plans for the
full-frame digicam so many of us are holding out for.
We also though that that was what the FA J lenses were all about. It could in fact
mean
Pål Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark wrote:
I suspect this means lenses with less-than-full-frame coverage, made
specifically for the DSLR. Hope this doesn't affect plans for the
full-frame digicam so many of us are holding out for.
We also though that that was what the FA J lenses were
I suspect this means lenses with less-than-full-frame coverage, made
specifically for the DSLR. Hope this doesn't affect plans for the
full-frame digicam so many of us are holding out for.
I'm sure not holding out for it. A smaller-than-35mm sensor is one of the
primary advantages of the new
On 26 Feb 2003 at 18:16, Mike Johnston wrote:
I suspect this means lenses with less-than-full-frame coverage, made
specifically for the DSLR. Hope this doesn't affect plans for the
full-frame digicam so many of us are holding out for.
I'm sure not holding out for it. A
On Wednesday, February 26, 2003, at 07:44 PM, Rob Studdert wrote:
I'm holding out for it (10MP+ FFS), a smaller-than-35mm sensor is a
major
disadvantage to my mind. But we've been through all this before...
Thank your chosen deity they've finally done something but I'll stick
with my
Oly E for
7 matches
Mail list logo
