I submitted a user review of the camera.
Others may want to as well.
Odd, I thought I sent this last night. Interestingly, no word on my user
review yet, and no sign of it either.
On Feb 28, 2012, at 1:10 PM, Brian Walters wrote:
according to PC Magazine:
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 4:16 AM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
I submitted a user review of the camera.
Others may want to as well.
Odd, I thought I sent this last night. Interestingly, no word on my user
review yet, and no sign of it either.
Probably because you said nice things.
From: Brian Walters
according to PC Magazine:
http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2400556,00.asp
So, what's all this crap you guys have been feeding me for the past year?
Makes Ken Rockwell look knowledgeable. It's been out for how long and
the computer geek is just now getting
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 3:09 PM, John Sessoms jsessoms...@nc.rr.com wrote:
From: Brian Walters
according to PC Magazine:
http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2400556,00.asp
So, what's all this crap you guys have been feeding me for the past year?
Makes Ken Rockwell look
On 2/28/2012 4:10 PM, Brian Walters wrote:
according to PC Magazine:
http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2400556,00.asp
So, what's all this crap you guys have been feeding me for the past year?
:-)
Obviously an outlier, and comes to the opposite conclusion to just about
every other
according to PC Magazine:
http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2400556,00.asp
So, what's all this crap you guys have been feeding me for the past year?
:-)
--
Cheers
Brian
++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney Australia
http://lyons-ryan.org/southernlight/
Thread over at PF
http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/pentax-k-5-forum/176995-pc-magazine-tests-k-5-a.html
And the author's response to an email
http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/pentax-k-5-forum/176995-pc-magazine-tests-k-5-a-2.html#post1845277
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Brian Walters
it's hampered by an underperforming kit lens, poor high ISO
performance, and some other issues.
... in particular, badly researched reviews.
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Brian Walters apathy...@lyons-ryan.org wrote:
according to PC Magazine:
On 2/28/2012 3:10 PM, Brian Walters wrote:
according to PC Magazine:
http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2400556,00.asp
So, what's all this crap you guys have been feeding me for the past year?
:-)
This is exactly why I go to PC Magazine as my first source for
information on
on 2/28/12 2:10 PMBrian Walters wrote
according to PC Magazine:
http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2400556,00.asp
and yet the K-r does a good job in low-light
http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2400666,00.asp
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 4:18 PM, Bruce Walker bruce.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
it's hampered by an underperforming kit lens, poor high ISO
performance, and some other issues.
... in particular, badly researched reviews.
10-4. Like his review, i have only shot jpegs with my K-5, maybe 10-15
Raw
Quoting David J Brooks pentko...@gmail.com:
Now i just listen to what Cotty says, and just do the opposite.
Mark!
--
Cheers
Brian
++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney Australia
http://lyons-ryan.org/southernlight/
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
On 28/2/12, David J Brooks, discombobulated, unleashed:
Now i just listen to what Cotty says, and just do the opposite.
There's not a lot to add to that is there!!
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
-- http://www.cottysnaps.com
13 matches
Mail list logo
