Re: PESO: Prairie Pano

2007-04-11 Thread Norm Baugher
Bill, I thought you finished your restoration on your house... Norm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In a message dated 4/8/2007 8:38:09 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: This is 2 shots using the A400/5.6 married together. The seam is kinda visible, I need to work on this

Re: PESO: Prairie Pano

2007-04-11 Thread William Robb
- Original Message - From: Norm Baugher Subject: Re: PESO: Prairie Pano Bill, I thought you finished your restoration on your house... This is a new project. A real fixer upper. b... http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/pictures/peso/400pano.html -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail

Re: PESO: Prairie Pano

2007-04-11 Thread William Robb
Thanks Brian, Mark and Marnie for commenting on my picture. William Robb -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Re: PESO: Prairie Pano

2007-04-11 Thread Russell Kerstetter
there seams to be no seem. nice picture, I am pretty sure I would not have thought of doing a pano with that length of lens... of course the fact that I don't *own* one could have something to do with that. Russ On 4/8/07, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is 2 shots using the

Re: PESO: Prairie Pano

2007-04-11 Thread William Robb
- Original Message - From: Russell Kerstetter Subject: Re: PESO: Prairie Pano there seams to be no seem. nice picture, I am pretty sure I would not have thought of doing a pano with that length of lens... of course the fact that I don't *own* one could have something to do

Re: PESO: Prairie Pano

2007-04-09 Thread Brian Walters
Quoting William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]: This is 2 shots using the A400/5.6 married together. The seam is kinda visible, Is it? I'm gonna have to get my eyes (re)tested. Apart from that, I like it but perhaps some boost to the mid tones would make it more pleasing. Cheers Brian

Re: PESO: Prairie Pano

2007-04-09 Thread ann sanfedele
William Robb wrote: This is 2 shots using the A400/5.6 married together. The seam is kinda visible, I need to work on this technique some more. http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/pictures/peso/400pano.html Enjoy William Robb I like it - I can't see the seam -- maybe make it a bit darker or

Re: PESO: Prairie Pano

2007-04-09 Thread William Robb
- Original Message - From: David Savage Subject: Re: PESO: Prairie Pano Works for me. Although may I humbly suggest a slight curves adjustment to bump up the contrast ever so slightly. Try it again. I did leave it kinda flat Thanks William Robb And I can't find the seam

Re: PESO: Prairie Pano

2007-04-09 Thread William Robb
Thanks Fenando, Brian, Ann and Dave for looking. I bumped the levels a bit on this one... http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/pictures/peso/400pano.html William Robb -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Re: PESO: Prairie Pano

2007-04-09 Thread David Savage
On 4/9/07, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: - Original Message - From: David Savage Subject: Re: PESO: Prairie Pano Works for me. Although may I humbly suggest a slight curves adjustment to bump up the contrast ever so slightly. Try it again. I did leave it kinda flat

Re: PESO: Prairie Pano

2007-04-09 Thread ann sanfedele
Yeah - more better :) ann William Robb wrote: Thanks Fenando, Brian, Ann and Dave for looking. I bumped the levels a bit on this one... http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/pictures/peso/400pano.html William Robb -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net

Re: PESO: Prairie Pano

2007-04-09 Thread Patrice LACOUTURE (GMail)
Nice picture, works for me. The lightly bent horizon disturbs me. I initially thought it was how the scene really is, before I realized that all vertial lines are also slightly bent to the right. Maybe fixing this would improve the picture. Patrice William Robb a écrit : This is 2 shots

Re: PESO: Prairie Pano

2007-04-09 Thread William Robb
- Original Message - From: Patrice LACOUTURE (GMail) Subject: Re: PESO: Prairie Pano Nice picture, works for me. The lightly bent horizon disturbs me. I initially thought it was how the scene really is, before I realized that all vertial lines are also slightly bent to the right

Re: PESO: Prairie Pano

2007-04-09 Thread Brian Walters
Yes - the revised version is better I hadn't noticed the sloping horizon - now I can't take my eyes off it. (and I still can't see the join!) Cheers Brian ++ Brian Walters Western Sydney Australia Quoting Patrice LACOUTURE (GMail) [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

Re: PESO: Prairie Pano

2007-04-09 Thread Mark Cassino
I was gonna say the levels look fine to me, but see that you replaced it. Nice subject(s) - mixed feelings about the elevator (or whatever) on the horizon behind them. But the buildings are really rich. Can't see the seam. (If you zipped it maybe we could see the zipper...) Nice shot - MCC

Re: PESO: Prairie Pano

2007-04-09 Thread Eactivist
In a message dated 4/8/2007 8:38:09 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: This is 2 shots using the A400/5.6 married together. The seam is kinda visible, I need to work on this technique some more. http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/pictures/peso/400pano.html Enjoy William

PESO: Prairie Pano

2007-04-08 Thread William Robb
This is 2 shots using the A400/5.6 married together. The seam is kinda visible, I need to work on this technique some more. http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/pictures/peso/400pano.html Enjoy William Robb -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net

Re: PESO: Prairie Pano

2007-04-08 Thread David Savage
Works for me. Although may I humbly suggest a slight curves adjustment to bump up the contrast ever so slightly. And I can't find the seam. Cheers, Dave On 4/9/07, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is 2 shots using the A400/5.6 married together. The seam is kinda visible, I need to

Re: PESO: Prairie Pano

2007-04-08 Thread Fernando Terrazzino
ditto On 4/9/07, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Works for me. Although may I humbly suggest a slight curves adjustment to bump up the contrast ever so slightly. And I can't find the seam. Cheers, Dave On 4/9/07, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is 2 shots using the