Re: Publishing and digital photos

2003-11-13 Thread brooksdj
Wendy , you wrote: Sigh. Can't get the staff these days. Wondering if I can get away with a dye sub print from the olympus instead. Dave - what do you reckon? Will it pass muster? Hi Wendy Well if the oh'sss and ha'sss from the lads at the last

Re: Publishing and digital photos

2003-11-13 Thread Paul Stenquist
The magazines I shoot for want 40 megabyte images. They can be saved as level 12 jpegs or as tiffs. I generally save them as tiffs and submit them on CDs. The stock houses ask for the same resolution. Paul On Tuesday, November 11, 2003, at 10:05 PM, Doug Franklin wrote: On Tue, 11 Nov 2003

Re: Publishing and digital photos

2003-11-12 Thread Dag T
På 11. nov. 2003 kl. 21.27 skrev wendy beard: Someone on one of the mailing lists I'm on needed photographs for one of the chapters in her soon to be published book. One of the stipulations from the publisher was that they were not to be digital photographs as they didn't reproduce well.

Re: Publishing and digital photos

2003-11-12 Thread Jostein
/ - Pictures at: http://oksne.net - - Original Message - From: wendy beard [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: pdml [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 9:27 PM Subject: Publishing and digital photos Someone on one of the mailing lists I'm on needed photographs

Re: Publishing and digital photos

2003-11-12 Thread Ann Sanfedele
] To: pdml [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 9:27 PM Subject: Publishing and digital photos Someone on one of the mailing lists I'm on needed photographs for one of the chapters in her soon to be published book. One of the stipulations from the publisher was that they were

Re: Publishing and digital photos

2003-11-12 Thread graywolf
: Publishing and digital photos Someone on one of the mailing lists I'm on needed photographs for one of the chapters in her soon to be published book. One of the stipulations from the publisher was that they were not to be digital photographs as they didn't reproduce well. Anyone heard

Re: Publishing and digital photos

2003-11-12 Thread wendy beard
At 06:11 PM 12/11/2003 -0500, you wrote: But if it really is just incompetence at the publisher level (or non-up to dateness) where Wendy was submitting, she surely has the savvy to get around it by making a hi res file and getting it printed though a digi-lab , yes? annsan Very cunning! Actually,

Re: Publishing and digital photos

2003-11-11 Thread Dave Miers
] To: pdml [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 3:27 PM Subject: Publishing and digital photos Someone on one of the mailing lists I'm on needed photographs for one of the chapters in her soon to be published book. One of the stipulations from the publisher was that they were

Re: Publishing and digital photos

2003-11-11 Thread gregcooper
: wendy beard [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: pdml [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 12:27 PM Subject: Publishing and digital photos Someone on one of the mailing lists I'm on needed photographs for one of the chapters in her soon to be published book. One of the stipulations from

Re: Publishing and digital photos

2003-11-11 Thread Cotty
On 11/11/03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged: Someone on one of the mailing lists I'm on needed photographs for one of the chapters in her soon to be published book. One of the stipulations from the publisher was that they were not to be digital photographs as they didn't reproduce well. Anyone

Re: Publishing and digital photos

2003-11-11 Thread Herb Chong
problem. Herb - Original Message - From: wendy beard [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: pdml [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 3:27 PM Subject: Publishing and digital photos Someone on one of the mailing lists I'm on needed photographs for one of the chapters in her soon

Re: Publishing and digital photos

2003-11-11 Thread Peter Spiro
A blanket prohibition on digital pictures seems ignorant -- they should judge based on the quality of the individual pictures. A 6mp digital camera may not be able to do good enough pictuere for a 9x18 inch coffee table book, but most 35mm shots are also too grainy for that size of