I think I've got it!
The Depth of Field is anything in an image that is not Bokeh!
On Apr 7, 2009, at 13:05 , Joseph McAllister wrote:
The capitalization percentage is rising, folks.
You may wish to step back a bit
On Apr 7, 2009, at 12:53 , JC OConnell wrote:
I already stated you
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 4:07 PM, Joseph McAllister pentax...@mac.com wrote:
The Depth of Field is anything in an image that is not Bokeh!
But the question is, how much is there? Not much, or bokehtloads?
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 01:07:35PM -0700, Joseph McAllister wrote:
I think I've got it!
The Depth of Field is anything in an image that is not Bokeh!
Now *this* is a Speckable quote.
--
The fastest way to get your question answered on the net is to post
the wrong answer.
Larry Colen
If there's a lot, then not much...
It's a formula.
On Apr 7, 2009, at 13:33 , Matthew Hunt wrote:
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 4:07 PM, Joseph McAllister
pentax...@mac.com wrote:
The Depth of Field is anything in an image that is not Bokeh!
But the question is, how much is there? Not much,
4 matches
Mail list logo