Re: Trading resolution for depth of field - Wait!

2009-04-07 Thread Joseph McAllister
I think I've got it! The Depth of Field is anything in an image that is not Bokeh! On Apr 7, 2009, at 13:05 , Joseph McAllister wrote: The capitalization percentage is rising, folks. You may wish to step back a bit On Apr 7, 2009, at 12:53 , JC OConnell wrote: I already stated you

Re: Trading resolution for depth of field - Wait!

2009-04-07 Thread Matthew Hunt
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 4:07 PM, Joseph McAllister pentax...@mac.com wrote: The Depth of Field is anything in an image that is not Bokeh! But the question is, how much is there? Not much, or bokehtloads? -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net

Re: Trading resolution for depth of field - Wait!

2009-04-07 Thread Larry Colen
On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 01:07:35PM -0700, Joseph McAllister wrote: I think I've got it! The Depth of Field is anything in an image that is not Bokeh! Now *this* is a Speckable quote. -- The fastest way to get your question answered on the net is to post the wrong answer. Larry Colen

Re: Trading resolution for depth of field - Wait!

2009-04-07 Thread Joseph McAllister
If there's a lot, then not much... It's a formula. On Apr 7, 2009, at 13:33 , Matthew Hunt wrote: On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 4:07 PM, Joseph McAllister pentax...@mac.com wrote: The Depth of Field is anything in an image that is not Bokeh! But the question is, how much is there? Not much,