http://www.robertstech.com/temp/7dd07103.jpg
This is near the location of the earlier shot.
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/7dd07202.jpg
This is way out on the Grandfather Mountain ridge. Looking at it now
I'm wondering what I could have been thinking hauling the 67 out there
with all my other
Lovely! Did you scan them on a flatbed?
Paul
On Dec 22, 2013, at 1:45 PM, Mark Roberts postmas...@robertstech.com wrote:
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/7dd07103.jpg
This is near the location of the earlier shot.
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/7dd07202.jpg
This is way out on the
I particularly like the ridge line shot. The foreground flowers are a nice
touch of springtime!
Did you replicate this shot (or either of the other two you shared) using a
digital camera? If so, does the extra (?) 6x7 quality justify the pain of
hauling the gear?
stan
On Dec 22, 2013, at 1:45
Paul Stenquist wrote:
Lovely! Did you scan them on a flatbed?
Nope. I get my E6 processed by Dwayne's Photo and pay an extra five
bucks for scans. They're only around 900dpi (~2500 x 2000 pixels) but
good enough for small prints and web presentation.
I can get slightly better resolution with my
Stan Halpin wrote:
I particularly like the ridge line shot. The foreground flowers are a nice
touch of springtime!
Did you replicate this shot (or either of the other two you shared) using a
digital camera?
If so, does the extra (?) 6x7 quality justify the pain of hauling the gear?
Won't be
What Paul said..
especially the ridge shot
ann
On 12/22/2013 15:21, Paul Stenquist wrote:
Lovely! Did you scan them on a flatbed?
Paul
On Dec 22, 2013, at 1:45 PM, Mark Roberts postmas...@robertstech.com wrote:
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/7dd07103.jpg
This is near the location of the
6 matches
Mail list logo