On Nov 30, 2007, at 12:45 PM, Jan van Wijk wrote:
As I said, you have to close and reopen the database to have the
metadata browser show the new lens names.
But hat would happen on close/reopen lightRoom as well wouldn't it ?
That's the same operation.
The Metadata editing panel
for each
Hi Godders,
On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 06:09:22 -0800, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Will fiddle with it some more before giving up :-)
As I said, you have to close and reopen the database to have the
metadata browser show the new lens names.
But hat would happen on close/reopen lightRoom as well
, very cheap.
HTH
Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: more Lightroom 1.3 improvement ...
Thanks for the compliments, Stan and Dave.
I am planning to do a Lightroom workshop ... A bit of market
Hi Goders,
On Mon, 26 Nov 2007 13:21:42 -0800, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
- Then select all and use the Metadata-Save Metadata to file
command to ensure that all edits are written to all selected files.
For DNG files, use the Metadata - Update DNG Metadata Preview
command. That will let
On Mon, 26 Nov 2007 13:21:42 -0800, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Have not looked back yet to see if all the DA limiteds and other
relatively new lenses are now displayed correctly too.
(they used to end up in the 'other lenses' bin :-)
You might have to manually synchronize the metadata between
On Nov 28, 2007, at 11:02 AM, Jan van Wijk wrote:
- Then select all and use the Metadata-Save Metadata to file
command to ensure that all edits are written to all selected files.
For DNG files, use the Metadata - Update DNG Metadata Preview
command. That will let Lightroom re-import all
If he was not so far away, i would sign up.:-)
Dave
On Nov 26, 2007 9:13 PM, Stan Halpin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Have you considered teaching LR classes on the side? I don't know if
you know everything, but when it comes to the obscure multi-step
processes to fix niggling frustrations, man
Thanks for the compliments, Stan and Dave.
I am planning to do a Lightroom workshop ... A bit of market research:
Very basic outline:
- Installation and configuration
- Basic features and use - overall
Concepts
How Lightroom Differs From Photoshop
How Lightroom Integrates With
If you could do a DVD, it could be worth selling that to.:-)
How do you feel about a GFM spot, what say you Don and Mark.
Dave
Dave
On Nov 27, 2007 9:39 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the compliments, Stan and Dave.
I am planning to do a Lightroom workshop ... A
On Nov 27, 2007, at 8:41 AM, David J Brooks wrote:
If you could do a DVD, it could be worth selling that to.:-)
yup .. :-)
How do you feel about a GFM spot, what say you Don and Mark.
That could be good. Not been to GFM myself as yet. It's a long way to
go but then again I have friends who
On Nov 27, 2007 11:47 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 27, 2007, at 8:41 AM, David J Brooks wrote:
If you could do a DVD, it could be worth selling that to.:-)
yup .. :-)
How do you feel about a GFM spot, what say you Don and Mark.
That could be good. Not been to GFM
I've been using LR for several months, and still feel
as though I've only scratched the surface, and am
doing some things the hard way. I would gladly pay
$100-200 for a two-day workshop; I don't think you
could cover everything here in one day. Ideally,
there would be facilities for hands-on
In a message dated 11/27/2007 8:48:33 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Nov 27, 2007, at 8:41 AM, David J Brooks wrote:
If you could do a DVD, it could be worth selling that to.:-)
yup .. :-)
How do you feel about a GFM spot, what say you Don and Mark.
That could
I added a couple of topic suggestions to your list below.
Reasonable price? I think the going rate for professional trainers is
from is $795/day to $1495/day. I've been to enough one-day sessions
produced/managed by professional trainers to be very leery of
paying that much out of my own
Just noticed that LR v1.3 now properly interprets the DA* series lens
names in the metadata, whether PEF or DNG. Another minor issue fixed.
:-)
Godfrey
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the
Hi Godfrey,
On Mon, 26 Nov 2007 10:18:03 -0800, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Just noticed that LR v1.3 now properly interprets the DA* series lens
names in the metadata, whether PEF or DNG. Another minor issue fixed.
Yes, I noticed that too after importing the images from a Toronto trip
last week,
On Nov 26, 2007, at 7:04 PM, Jan van Wijk wrote:
On Mon, 26 Nov 2007 10:18:03 -0800, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Just noticed that LR v1.3 now properly interprets the DA* series lens
names in the metadata, whether PEF or DNG. Another minor issue fixed.
Yes, I noticed that too after importing
Have you considered teaching LR classes on the side? I don't know if
you know everything, but when it comes to the obscure multi-step
processes to fix niggling frustrations, man you rock! Thanks for
sharing your wisdom!
stan
On Nov 26, 2007, at 3:21 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Nov
18 matches
Mail list logo
