RE: more Photkina information
Rubenstein, Bruce M (Bruce) wrote: Care to make a little wager? I bet Pentax doesn't show any DSLR that goes on sale this year. Would anything shown at Photokina, digital or not, really be on sale by the end of this year? Cheers, - Dave http://www.digistar.com/~dmann/ (out of date)
Re: more Photkina information
FA117/2.5 Limited. :) Would anything shown at Photokina, digital or not, really be on sale by the end of this year?
Re: Re: more Photkina information
From David Would anything shown at Photokina, digital or not, really be on sale by the end of this year? MOST things shown at Photokina are available within a month or two, if not immediately. If the items were to be delayed longer than that, then MOST manufacturers would wait for the PMA show. Pat Temmerman [MZ3_fella] ___ GO.com Mail Get Your Free, Private E-mail at http://mail.go.com
RE: more Photkina information
According to Colorfoto-Website (German Photo-magazin) Kodak will show a 16 MP SLR at photokina. http://www.netedition.de/sixcms/detail.php3?id=29445 Speculation abounds: Kodak already has a 16-Megapixel digital back for professional cameras in their lineup. This chip would only have to be modified slightly, in order to fit into a small SLR camera. Officially Kodak still wraps itself in silence. Could this be it: http://www.kodak.com/US/plugins/acrobat/en/digital/ccd/kai11000.pdf From DPReview: 35mm format, 10.8MP. It is designed for professional digital still camera applications, according to the sheet. Could this be the sensor in the next Kodak DCS camera? It would offer full-frame coverage and, because it's an interline-transfer sensor, fast shutter speeds. Apparently not an impressive frame rate, though; they talk of 1-3 fps. Don't know whose body Kodak is going to install it in? Pseee Mr Pentax??!?!?!?
RE: more Photkina information
Sorry to (maybe) burst your bubble Rob.. But I've heard rumour from the List moderator on the HUG that there's plans to have an inexpensive digital back for the Blad. It could be for the Blad.. I don't know for sure.. but I'm just saying it could be :) Cheers, Dave Original Message: - From: Rob Brigham [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2002 15:28:16 +0100 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: more Photkina information According to Colorfoto-Website (German Photo-magazin) Kodak will show a 16 MP SLR at photokina. http://www.netedition.de/sixcms/detail.php3?id=29445 Speculation abounds: Kodak already has a 16-Megapixel digital back for professional cameras in their lineup. This chip would only have to be modified slightly, in order to fit into a small SLR camera. Officially Kodak still wraps itself in silence. Could this be it: http://www.kodak.com/US/plugins/acrobat/en/digital/ccd/kai11000.pdf From DPReview: 35mm format, 10.8MP. It is designed for professional digital still camera applications, according to the sheet. Could this be the sensor in the next Kodak DCS camera? It would offer full-frame coverage and, because it's an interline-transfer sensor, fast shutter speeds. Apparently not an impressive frame rate, though; they talk of 1-3 fps. Don't know whose body Kodak is going to install it in? Pseee Mr Pentax??!?!?!? mail2web - Check your email from the web at http://mail2web.com/ .
Re: more Photkina information
Rubenstein, Bruce M (Bruce) wrote: It will not have a K mount. If you want a K mound DSLR, find a good machinist. You folks just don't get it. Well then, suppose you TELL us. keith whaley From: Rob Brigham ... is designed for professional digital still camera applications Don't know whose body Kodak is going to install it in? Pseee Mr Pentax??!?!?!?
Re: more Photkina information
On Thursday 19 September 2002 15:28, Rob Brigham wrote: Don't know whose body Kodak is going to install it in? Pamela Anderson? -- Frits J. Wüthrich (Sent with Kmail)
Re: more Photkina information
On Thu, 19 Sep 2002, Frits J. [iso-8859-1] Wüthrich wrote: On Thursday 19 September 2002 15:28, Rob Brigham wrote: Don't know whose body Kodak is going to install it in? Pamela Anderson? She traded in her sillicon implants for one with a smaller megapixel rating. :) -- http://www.infotainment.org The destructive character is cheerful. - Walter Benjamin
Re: more Photkina information
I think I'd actually like to see that. Then again all things considered probably not. At 07:44 PM 9/19/2002 +0100, you wrote: On Thursday 19 September 2002 15:28, Rob Brigham wrote: Don't know whose body Kodak is going to install it in? Pamela Anderson? -- Frits J. Wüthrich (Sent with Kmail)
Re[2]: more Photkina information
Hi, Thursday, September 19, 2002, 1:22:23 PM, you wrote: Hi, Keith wrote: ?? 'Chamboulé' is not in my Larousse Français-Anglais Dictionnaire! g I don't know what it means either but it does _sound_ like a good verb for describing the digital SLR market mike (whacking great smirk) It is. It means 'in a mess' (to put it politely). --- Bob
Re: more Photkina information
On Thu, 19 Sep 2002, Peter Alling wrote: I think I'd actually like to see that. Then again all things considered probably not. This comes back to the procotology camera someone sent out a week or so ago, doesn't it? -- http://www.infotainment.org The destructive character is cheerful. - Walter Benjamin
RE: more Photkina information
Care to make a little wager? I bet Pentax doesn't show any DSLR that goes on sale this year. From: Rob Brigham [EMAIL PROTECTED] Whether we get a D-SLR soon or not, only time will tell. We can still hope. Without hope the world would be a poorer place. You try to destroy our hope with no basis of fact from which to speak.
Re: more Photkina information
If I were a betting man, I'd wager they'll show a DSLR that goes on sale next year. Bill - Original Message - From: Rubenstein, Bruce M (Bruce) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 4:19 PM Subject: RE: more Photkina information Care to make a little wager? I bet Pentax doesn't show any DSLR that goes on sale this year. From: Rob Brigham [EMAIL PROTECTED] Whether we get a D-SLR soon or not, only time will tell. We can still hope. Without hope the world would be a poorer place. You try to destroy our hope with no basis of fact from which to speak.
RE: more Photkina information
How about I bet a 2002 Pentax D-SLR and you bet a 2002 Canon D-SLR? Heads I win, tales you lose!! -Original Message- From: Rubenstein, Bruce M (Bruce) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 19 September 2002 21:19 To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: more Photkina information Care to make a little wager? I bet Pentax doesn't show any DSLR that goes on sale this year. From: Rob Brigham [EMAIL PROTECTED] Whether we get a D-SLR soon or not, only time will tell. We can still hope. Without hope the world would be a poorer place. You try to destroy our hope with no basis of fact from which to speak.
