On 2007-06-07, at 04:23, Paul Stenquist wrote:
Uh, yeah it sold for way to high a price. Good to see that Pentax
gear is still drawing large dollars. But I don't understand what that
has to do with a high-res MF camera
That's not good so far, at least for newcomers who are still building
High-res MF cameras aren't part of current Pentax reality.
This is.
At 10:00 PM 6/6/2007, you wrote:
Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2007 22:23:53 -0400
From: Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: who cares about 22mp
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type
when things are this crazy ...
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemih=001sspagename=STRK%3AMEWA%3AITviewitem=item=110133342168rd=1rd=1
Sincerely,
Collin Brendemuehl
http://www.brendemuehl.net
http://evangelicalperspective.blogspot.com
http://evangelicalinteraction.blogspot.com
Uh, yeah it sold for way to high a price. Good to see that Pentax
gear is still drawing large dollars. But I don't understand what that
has to do with a high-res MF camera
Paul
On Jun 6, 2007, at 10:55 PM, Collin R Brendemuehl wrote:
when things are this crazy ...
Uh, yeah it sold for way to high a price. Good to see that Pentax
gear is still drawing large dollars. But I don't understand what that
has to do with a high-res MF camera
Paul
On Jun 6, 2007, at 10:55 PM, Collin R Brendemuehl wrote:
when things are this crazy ...
Holy Crap. I think I paid about $70.00 US for mine in like new
condition without a box, (but with the case). I never knew a box could
be worth $630.00.
Paul Stenquist wrote:
Uh, yeah it sold for way to high a price. Good to see that Pentax
gear is still drawing large dollars. But I don't
6 matches
Mail list logo
