I'm watching an auction for a Pentax 67 MLU with metered prism. No lens and
it has a grid focussing screen. It is local so I can pick it up. It is
currently at AUD 142.50 with 30 minutes to go. That is really cheap. I'm
torn though...do i bid or do I wait and go with a 645? They both have
At 01:55 PM 5/10/2006, J and K Messervy wrote:
I'm watching an auction for a Pentax 67 MLU with metered prism. No lens and
it has a grid focussing screen. It is local so I can pick it up. It is
currently at AUD 142.50 with 30 minutes to go. That is really cheap. I'm
torn though...do i bid or
I own a Medalist II. I haven't used it in years. I have one negative of
a sunset photo that I took at Oregon's Cannon Beach over 35 years ago. I
still get georgeous enlargements from it.
My favorite vintage medium format camera is an Omega 120. The Omega was
built in the U.S. and was the
I decided not to rush things. Tempted as I was, I let it go. It went for
$229.50 Aus...that is a real bargain for someone!
I'll still leaning for 645 for modern features and less vibration. In the
end, I suspect I'll get whichever I can get the best bargain on.
- Original Message -
Staples? Sutures? A lot of our surgeons are using
glue.
No kidding.
No cool value at all...
Rick
--- Don Sanderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sutures?
I'm jealous, all I ever get is staples! ;-)
Don (Whose belly looks like Zorro got him!)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
When I got into a punching match with a window many moons ago, all the
doctor used was the medical equivalent of duct tap.
Mind you, it left me with a pretty cool scar on the back of my hand.
Dave
At 02:47 PM 5/10/2006, Rick Womer wrote:
Staples? Sutures? A lot of our surgeons are using
glue.
My thinking is if you're going to go medium format, get the bigger one.
Agreed! From my experience scanning and printing from my own 6x7 negs and
6x4.5 negs from a former coworker, the 6x7 negs produced much better BIG
enlargements. Of course, not many people print really really big, so it
I just spoke to someone at CR Kennedy and was told that since Pentax had
the
K10D at Photokina without the finalised firmware, they expect that their
first shipment is about 6-8 weeks away. Last time I spoke to someone,
they
said early Nov for the first shipment. You'd think Pentax would
From: P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
By the way, does this make me
an axillary member of the brotherhood?
You want to live in their armpits?
axilla
n. (pl. -las, -lae ,) armpit; shoulder. axillary a. of arm-pit; of or growing
in an axil.
Eeeew.
From: Michel Carrère-Gée [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/10/05 Thu AM 05:25:26 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Need some help with lens reasembly...
mike wilson a écrit :
Matt Kelch wrote:
In trying to disassemble a lens I accidentally dislodged a few
On Oct 5, 2006, at 1:46 AM, Gonz wrote:
Of course, the eyedropper can be handy, I use it alot. But not every
pic is going to have something with grey (equal RGB values). In the
pictures I was working on , this was the situation. Its a pain to
have
to hunt around the white balance space
On Oct 5, 2006, at 4:41 AM, Kenneth Waller wrote:
- In Photoshop, you upsample by using Image-Image Size... and
setting the image to any pixel dimensions larger than the native
original size with the Resample Image box checked.
I've read several places that when increasing file size in CS2
Yes, it's just a semantic difference. Resizing is ambiguous as to
whether you're upsampling (interpolating to a larger matrix) or
downsampling (interpolating to a smaller matrix). The direction of
interpolation can change the methodology you use to resize vis-a-vis
the quality of the
On Oct 5, 2006, at 6:41 PM, William Robb wrote:
Thanks Godfrey.
I am trying to decide if I can get the 24 one past the planning
department.
That's easy. Start looking at the 30 monster, then be convinced
to settle for only the 24 :)
- Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On Oct 5, 2006, at 6:55 PM, J and K Messervy wrote:
I'm watching an auction for a Pentax 67 MLU with metered prism. No
lens and
it has a grid focussing screen. It is local so I can pick it up.
It is
currently at AUD 142.50 with 30 minutes to go. That is really
cheap. I'm
torn
graywolf wrote:
A Medalist? Bet there are not too many folks on the list even know what
it is. Photography on Bald Mountain will convert it to 120 for lots of
money. Their reputation is great, but I have never done any business
with them. http://www.baldmtn.com/
Great site, Tom...
I've
On 05/10/06, John Celio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Before today, I was intently searching eBay for a used Fuji 6x17 medium
format panoramic camera. THAT would be awesome!
Problem is if you need to digitize it's a PITA to scan the frames,
170mm is too long for most of the dedicated MF desktop
On Wed, 4 Oct 2006, P?l Jensen wrote:
The Pentax K10D brochure claim print size up to 50 X 70cm. Is this just hype
or what? I certainly cannot print that large from my 645 slides.
Hi Paal,
Christian below says 20x30inch; that's approx 50x75cm. At least one
person has done it :-) And that's
Is there gonna be a cool scar? Will you look just
like a pirate? Or a gangster?
But now he can be the Captain. A
HARRR!!! I've still got yer beat, mate! With yer wee cut. Ye ain't no
Captain!
http://exposedfilm.net/journal/seattle/injury.jpg(be warned!)
3 more inches, tree
On Wed, 4 Oct 2006, Tom C wrote:
Others have thought that lighting was too flat when that's exactly the way
the lighting was, and hence the photo was very close to what I saw with my
eyes.
So they were right, it was flat, yes?
Kostas
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On Oct 5, 2006, at 8:20 AM, John Celio wrote:
My thinking is if you're going to go medium format, get the bigger
one.
Agreed! From my experience scanning and printing from my own 6x7
negs and
6x4.5 negs from a former coworker, the 6x7 negs produced much
better BIG
enlargements.
On Thu, 5 Oct 2006, Digital Image Studio wrote:
Lens coating isn't now the secret it was during WWII, flare is
minimised by good lens coatings but I overall flare resistance is a
function of coatings, optical design and internal barrel AR coatings,
baffling and of course lens shading.
And
On Oct 5, 2006, at 10:26 AM, Digital Image Studio wrote:
On 05/10/06, John Celio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Before today, I was intently searching eBay for a used Fuji 6x17
medium
format panoramic camera. THAT would be awesome!
Problem is if you need to digitize it's a PITA to scan the
On Wed, 4 Oct 2006, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
IMO, if any trust was betrayed, Mike betrayed yours. He's certainly
going to benefit from whatever time and energy you put in here.
I agree with Shel.
Good luck John.
Kostas
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On Thu, 5 Oct 2006, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
The DA14 reaches its peak performance between f/4.5 and f/5.6 in my
experience, but it's quite good even wide open (as you can see from
the examples).
Would you know what the MTF data favour for that lens?
Kostas
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
From: Digital Image Studio [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/10/05 Thu AM 09:26:45 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: 67 to bid or not to bid
On 05/10/06, John Celio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Before today, I was intently searching eBay for a used Fuji 6x17 medium
On 05.10.2006, at 11:31 , Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote:
And the number of elements?
And strength and angle of light source :-)))
Cheers,
Sylwek
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On Wed, 4 Oct 2006, Paul Stenquist wrote:
If your 135/2.5 is the SmC Takumar screwmount (either
of the two varieties available), I'd start it at $125. If it's an
earlier screwmount, I'd start it at $60.
As it is the Takumar Bayonet, great demand may not be there, I am
afraid. The LX
On Oct 4, 2006, at 8:37 AM, Adam Maas wrote:
In english, almost all rude slang is either scatological or sexual.
Damn
and its variants are the major exception. Unlike say french, where
much
rude slang is blasphmemous.
Sacre bleu!!
Bob
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On Oct 5, 2006, at 10:53 AM, Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote:
On Thu, 5 Oct 2006, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
The DA14 reaches its peak performance between f/4.5 and f/5.6 in my
experience, but it's quite good even wide open (as you can see from
the examples).
Would you know what the MTF data
What's wrong with the Takumar bayonet lens? From using it, I reckon it's a
great piece of glass.
- Original Message -
From: Kostas Kavoussanakis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Thursday, October 05, 2006 8:10 PM
Subject: Re: What's an LX worth?
On
On Oct 4, 2006, at 2:06 PM, John Francis wrote:
Quite. I'm often amused when a TV character with a British accent
(such as Spike, in Buffy the Vampire Slayer) says Bugger off,
or the like - it appears to be a loophole in the great American
puritanical broadcast TV vocabulary rules.
Yes,
From: Bob Shell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/10/05 Thu AM 10:10:31 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Need help: Photoshop molested children portraits?
On Oct 4, 2006, at 8:37 AM, Adam Maas wrote:
In english, almost all rude slang is either scatological or
Nah.
He doesn't look the least like Alan Greenspan.
:-)
Jostein
(having just read Going postal by Terry Pratchett)
On 10/5/06, graywolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, no, Mark looks like a pirate AND a gangster grin.
--
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
On Oct 5, 2006, at 6:30 AM, mike wilson wrote:
Name of an Andelusian dog! That requires satisfaction! Name your
weapons! (If we're using digital, can you hang on for a minute
while my batteries finish charging?)
I choose Polish sausages at 25 paces.
Bob
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
It was the least expensive of all the Pentax 135 K-mount lenses. Some
of the elements aren't multi-coated. The supply of these lenses exceeds
the demand, so they are not worth a lot. Others have reported getting
good results with the lens as well, but it's only forth around $50 US.
I'd start
On Thu, 5 Oct 2006, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
I have no idea where a credible source for MTF data on the DA14/2.8
might be. I'm commenting based on what I see from examining 800-1000
photographs made with it.
Hi Godfrey,
I assumed the DS has an MTF program-line; if it's true, a QD test
could
On Thu, 5 Oct 2006, mike wilson wrote:
Name of an Andelusian dog! That requires satisfaction! Name your weapons!
(If we're using digital, can you hang on for a minute while my batteries
finish charging?)
Deus ex machina mode
Here, have some AA Lithiums!
/Deus ex machina mode
Kostas
Ok, thanks for the tip
- Original Message -
From: Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Thursday, October 05, 2006 8:46 PM
Subject: Re: What's an LX worth?
It was the least expensive of all the Pentax 135 K-mount lenses. Some
of the
On 05/10/06, Sylwester Pietrzyk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 05.10.2006, at 11:31 , Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote:
And the number of elements?
And strength and angle of light source :-)))
Yes, but mainly lens coatings and the surface treatments of internal
spacing elements etc.
--
Rob Studdert
I sufferers by comparison to the SMC P 135mm f2.5 which is legendary.
Asahi originally used the Takumar name on their top line of lenses back
in the M42 mount days. When the K mount lenses were introduced they
changed the lens line name to Pentax. The Takumar bayonet lenses were
their
Ha!
I'd not seen that one.
Dave (Also easily ammused ;-)
On 10/5/06, Mitch Conant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David:
An ad campaign a few years ago for Toyota New Zealand featured it quite
heavily:
Now, that's funny!!! Hey I'll admit I'm not part of the PC (politically
correct) crowd g.
Fair enough, although I've mostly used it for people shots and I've been
very pleased with the results.
I've started the auction at AUD60 and I'll see what happens. I won't be
heart broken if it doesn't sell.
- Original Message -
From: P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss
Quoting J and K Messervy [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I decided not to rush things. Tempted as I was, I let it go. It went for
$229.50 Aus...that is a real bargain for someone!
I'll still leaning for 645 for modern features and less vibration. In the
end, I suspect I'll get whichever I can get the
On 05/10/06, Kostas Kavoussanakis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 5 Oct 2006, Digital Image Studio wrote:
Lens coating isn't now the secret it was during WWII, flare is
minimised by good lens coatings but I overall flare resistance is a
function of coatings, optical design and internal
Like I said no offence intended ;-)
Dave
On 10/5/06, Jostein Øksne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From www.onelook.com:
Quick definitions (pom)
noun: a disparaging term for English immigrants to Australia or New Zealand
Sooo... er...
Thanks, I guess...
hm.
Jostein :-)
On 10/4/06, David
mike wilson wrote:
If you look at parts 506, 508 and 509, they are the ones you
want to refit, along with the detent ball and spring on the
opposite side. They will go in place on the main lens body
and the aperture ring will slip over them. If only
Would an appropriately sized piston
They've got to hit the market fast.
I bet the first batch will hit the market in November.
However, they usually serve the Japanese market first and foremost. :-(
My local distributor hopes to have enough to cover the pre-orders
before Christmas.
Jostein
On 10/5/06, J and K Messervy [EMAIL
On 05/10/06, mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you are in the market for a 6x17, the word digitise [or even digitize
8-)] is probably not in your vocabulary.
Usually they are drum scanned, even ten years ago more people were
scanning 6x17 than enlarging to chemical print.
--
Rob
IIRC, the Takumar name was not resurrected for bargain lenses until the A era.
Jostein
On 10/5/06, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I sufferers by comparison to the SMC P 135mm f2.5 which is legendary.
Asahi originally used the Takumar name on their top line of lenses back
in the M42
On 10/5/06, Christian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
John Celio wrote:
Hey everyone. I just got laid off!
That blows dude, sorry.
That both sucks blows.
Best of luck John.
Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
From: Bob Shell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/10/05 Thu AM 10:44:04 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Need help: Photoshop molested children portraits?
On Oct 5, 2006, at 6:30 AM, mike wilson wrote:
Name of an Andelusian dog! That requires satisfaction!
From: Doug Franklin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/10/05 Thu PM 12:20:49 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Need some help with lens reasembly...
mike wilson wrote:
If you look at parts 506, 508 and 509, they are the ones you
want to refit, along with the
On Thu, 5 Oct 2006, Jostein ?ksne wrote:
IIRC, the Takumar name was not resurrected for bargain lenses until the A
era.
All these are non-A; only the 28 has an A-brother.
http://kmp.bdimitrov.de/lenses/primes/_non-SMC/tak_28f2.8.html
I hear you - but since I don't talk about such things to anyone (but
myself), I could call it George for all that it matters. But now, should
I need to mention it - probably only here or in conversation with people
from the list when getting together outside the screen venue - I'll be able
to be
I've spoken with Ken a few times as there was a custom mounting I was
considering a few years ago. He's the current Marty Forscher in such
matters of adaptation and repair.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: keith_w
A Medalist? Bet there are not too many folks on the list even know what
On Thu, 5 Oct 2006 01:02:57 -0400, you wrote:
On Oct 4, 2006, at 6:29 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Don Sanderson wrote:
Sutures?
I'm jealous, all I ever get is staples! ;-)
Staples? We'd 'ave been glad to 'ave staples! When I was a young man
we used to 'ave to bind our wounds up with duct
On Thu, 5 Oct 2006 12:37:37 +0200, you wrote:
Nah.
He doesn't look the least like Alan Greenspan.
snif That's the nicest thing anyone has ever said to me on this
list!
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Ok. :-)
There was also a Takumar-A 28-70mm (f/3.5 - 4.7 or somesuch), and a
corresponding telezoom.
Jostein
On 10/5/06, Kostas Kavoussanakis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 5 Oct 2006, Jostein ?ksne wrote:
IIRC, the Takumar name was not resurrected for bargain lenses until the A
era.
On 10/5/06, mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Doug Franklin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Would an appropriately sized piston ring compressor from the auto parts
store help hold everything in place while you slip it into the barrel?
I suspect something like that will be the official tool
On Thu, 5 Oct 2006 14:46:32 +1000, you wrote:
I just spoke to someone at CR Kennedy and was told that since Pentax had the
K10D at Photokina without the finalised firmware, they expect that their
first shipment is about 6-8 weeks away. Last time I spoke to someone, they
said early Nov for the
The Takumar Bayonet 135 f2.5 is a K mount, (no A setting), introduced in
1980 three years before the Super Program/Program A according to Boz's K
mount site. The site has some new updates in case anyone is interested BTW.
Jostein Øksne wrote:
IIRC, the Takumar name was not resurrected for
On Thu, 5 Oct 2006 18:57:24 +1300, you wrote:
On Oct 5, 2006, at 12:29 AM, David Savage wrote:
It's pretty mild language here. I tend to utter it when something
stuffs up.
An ad campaign a few years ago for Toyota New Zealand featured it
quite heavily:
On 10/4/06, Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Both nice. I'm curious on the first one - the horizon seems quite
sloped - some kind of hill or something? The lighting and exposure
look pretty good.
Thanks, Bruce. The shot was hand held and I tried to keep the camera
level. On the right,
On 10/4/06, Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, not that one - the starry night shot showing the roof of the house.
This one:
http://picasaweb.google.com/sdloveless/PDMLPESO/photo#4978870170851409938
ISO 200, f5.6, 50mm (18-55), 30 seconds. Sorry that took so long.
--
Scott
Naw, everyone (except me) has a 5x7 or bigger enlarger? Bet they would
look nice as 2.5x7.5 contact prints though.
--
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
http://webpages.charter.net/graywolf
Idiot Proof == Expert Proof
---
Digital Image Studio wrote:
On
Amazon is saying to expect delivery of my pre-order between October 27th and
October 30th. We'll see.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 5 Oct 2006 14:46:32 +1000, you wrote:
I just spoke to someone at CR Kennedy and was
Since he rubbed some ink in it the scar will probably show. You know
these pirates...
--
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
http://webpages.charter.net/graywolf
Idiot Proof == Expert Proof
---
Boris Liberman wrote:
Hi!
OK, I feel a bit of a prat about
Thanks Scott - I was asleep for the better part of the night, so the
delay wasn't an issue. Just started checking email, so your timing was
pretty much spot on. One more question: did you have noise reduction on or
off? I'm guessing off, but I'd like to be sure.
Shel
[Original Message]
Any 5x7 film scanner should work fine GRIN. BTW, can you really call a
2.25 x 7 inch negative medium format? Roll Film, yes; but medium format?
--
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
http://webpages.charter.net/graywolf
Idiot Proof == Expert Proof
---
Digital
On 10/5/06, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: J and K Messervy
I'll still leaning for 645 for modern features and less vibration.
The 6x7 does not have a vibration problem.
...lets roll the video
Dave ;-)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
On 05/10/06, graywolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any 5x7 film scanner should work fine GRIN. BTW, can you really call a
2.25 x 7 inch negative medium format? Roll Film, yes; but medium format?
My flatbed :-)
http://www.photo-i.co.uk/Reviews/interactive/Epson%20V700/page_1.htm
--
Rob Studdert
I have a chance to buy a Vivitar Series I 70-210 f/3.5, series 2 lens for
40.00. Is that a good version of this lens family? I know that there were
several iterations and can't remember which one was the best.
Walt
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Jostein Øksne wrote:
IIRC, the Takumar name was not resurrected for bargain lenses until the A
era.
Jostein
Honest question: Isn't that the same thing as saying The K-mount era?
I ask because in my mind, the change from top quality Taks and budget Taks
occurred when the switch was made to
Sure it does, Bill, all those people on the internet, who have never
even held one of the cameras, can not be wrong. Besides, even they
admitted that it was only at slow speeds on a flimsy, for that camera,
tripod.
--
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
http://webpages.charter.net/graywolf
On 10/5/06, Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Scott - I was asleep for the better part of the night, so the
delay wasn't an issue. Just started checking email, so your timing was
pretty much spot on. One more question: did you have noise reduction on or
off? I'm guessing off,
On 05/10/06, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The 6x7 does not have a vibration problem.
The P645 has less again, and my M7 has none :-)
--
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio//publications/
On 10/5/06, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: J and K Messervy
Subject: Re: 67 to bid or not to bid
I'll still leaning for 645 for modern features and less vibration.
The 6x7 does not have a vibration problem.
Last year Bill graced us with a
One just has to remember the old saw, I was looking for a job when I
came here. There is always another job down the road somewhere. Only in
the 50's and 60's did there seem to be such a thing as a permanent job
for most people, so where ever you are working, remember you are just
visiting.
On Thu, 5 Oct 2006, Walter Hamler wrote:
I have a chance to buy a Vivitar Series I 70-210 f/3.5, series 2 lens for
40.00. Is that a good version of this lens family? I know that there were
several iterations and can't remember which one was the best.
For all your 3rd party needs:
It seems that my shooting scenario may benefit from the use of rechargeable
batteries at times. Although this has been discussed here before, I've not
paid a lot of attention as the use of disposable AA bats were satisfactory
for the then current situation. So, what's the opinion/consensus of
On 10/5/06, Digital Image Studio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 05/10/06, graywolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any 5x7 film scanner should work fine GRIN. BTW, can you really call a
2.25 x 7 inch negative medium format? Roll Film, yes; but medium format?
My flatbed :-)
http://www.graywolfphoto.com/pentax/pdml-faq.html
--
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
http://webpages.charter.net/graywolf
Idiot Proof == Expert Proof
---
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote:
On Thu, 5 Oct 2006, Jostein ?ksne wrote:
IIRC, the Takumar name was not resurrected for bargain lenses until the A
era.
All these are non-A; only the 28 has an A-brother.
http://kmp.bdimitrov.de/lenses/primes/_non-SMC/tak_28f2.8.html
Yah, but my Universal Press, had a 2.8 lens and shot 6x9 trannies as
well as 6x7 negs and 3.25x4.25 Polaroid. Sigh, I miss that beast.
Vibration? An eight pound camera with a leaf shutter, you have to be
kidding.
--
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
http://webpages.charter.net/graywolf
Quoting Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Thu, 5 Oct 2006 01:02:57 -0400, you wrote:
On Oct 4, 2006, at 6:29 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Don Sanderson wrote:
Sutures?
I'm jealous, all I ever get is staples! ;-)
Staples? We'd 'ave been glad to 'ave staples! When I was a young man
we
Thanks Kostas. That is exactly what I was looking for.
Walt
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Just added some recent animal shots to my PESO gallery at:
http://www.dfsee.com/gallery/index.php?list=8
(no cats, no dogs :-)
Comment welcome!
Regards, JvW
--
Jan van Wijk; http://www.dfsee.com/gallery
--
PDML
D Brooks wrote:
Quoting Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Thu, 5 Oct 2006 01:02:57 -0400, you wrote:
On Oct 4, 2006, at 6:29 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Don Sanderson wrote:
Sutures?
I'm jealous, all I ever get is staples! ;-)
Staples? We'd 'ave been glad to 'ave staples! When I was
On 10/4/06, Christian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another pun thread... I'm gonna gag.
I've thought long and hard about it, and I don't think these are puns.
-frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On Thu, 5 Oct 2006 09:55:12 -0400, you wrote:
I have a chance to buy a Vivitar Series I 70-210 f/3.5, series 2 lens for
40.00. Is that a good version of this lens family? I know that there were
several iterations and can't remember which one was the best.
http://www.robertstech.com/vivitar.htm
From: David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/10/05 Thu PM 12:59:48 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Need some help with lens reasembly...
On 10/5/06, mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Doug Franklin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Would an appropriately
With John's departure from Reed's Cameras, I emailed Mike Reed to ask
for status on the K10D orders and confirm whom the contact point
would be. Mike replied that he would be handling the orders placed
through John personally, and he promised to contact his Pentax rep
and inform me regards
On Oct 5, 2006, at 11:56 AM, Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote:
I have no idea where a credible source for MTF data on the DA14/2.8
might be. I'm commenting based on what I see from examining 800-1000
photographs made with it.
I assumed the DS has an MTF program-line; if it's true, a QD test
On 10/5/06, Jerome Reyes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
HARRR!!! I've still got yer beat, mate! With yer wee cut. Ye ain't no
Captain!
http://exposedfilm.net/journal/seattle/injury.jpg(be warned!)
3 more inches, tree shavings, and used duct tape. Try harder next time!
and remember, tree
Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote:
On Thu, 5 Oct 2006, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
I have no idea where a credible source for MTF data on the DA14/2.8
might be. I'm commenting based on what I see from examining 800-1000
photographs made with it.
Hi Godfrey,
I assumed the DS has an MTF
Hello Paul,
Wednesday, October 4, 2006, 5:46:06 AM, you wrote:
PS Has anyone used Spyder 2 Express for monitor calibration? Seems like
PS an inexpensive way to go. Good reviews on Amazons site.
PS Paul
Yes I have used it with my old CRT monitor, and now with the new LCD.
It worked wery well
I like the peacock butterfly. Nice one.
Tom C.
From: Jan van Wijk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax discussion forum pdml@pdml.net
Subject: PESO: A few more animal shots Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2006 16:39:13
+0200 (CEST)
Just added some recent animal
I also had one of these lenses - sold it rather inexpensively to another
list member who seems to like it for _some_ of his work, but the imaging
quality doesn't compare favorably to the SMCP (K) 135/2.5, which is really
a nice lens in that focal length.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Godfrey
I've been using a set of Power2000 2400mah AA rechargeable NiMH
batteries since I bought the DS in January 2005. They come packaged
from BH with a matching fast charger (with both AC and 12V power
adapters) for about $30. Reliability has been very high, to the point
that I added a second
1 - 100 of 271 matches
Mail list logo
