I should be free mid afternoon. Fire when ready.
On 3/3/24 6:08 PM, Rick Womer wrote:
Thanks, Doug. I’d love to “pick your brain”!
Church and a memorial service ate up today. Tomorrow is pretty clear;
mid-to-late morning or after 2 in the afternoon would be best for me.
--
%(real_name)s
On 3/3/2024 4:25 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
Very few of my fantasies are likely, that doesn't make them much less fun, it
just means that they remain fantasies rather than becoming memories.
You just described my experience with girls while I was a teenager.
bill
--
%(real_name)s
On 3/03/2024 8:01 pm, Henk Terhell wrote:
More news on the Pentax film camera:
https://youtu.be/xqRQTOkhOJU?si=PssAjafiIoYaxbuW
As for me, with a least a dozen film camera's accumulating dust on the
shelf is not fair to these to invest in a new one.
Same here. All of this discussion
The snowdrops bloomed yesterday. As I’ve done for many a year, I got down on
the ground — more or less — and photographed a bloom. k-1, DFA 100/2.8 macro,
f13 1/250th.
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/ewfysku994twcsd9puqoe/snowdrop.24.jpg?rlkey=csl5k56dysa7eqgjdu7so7udb=0
Paul
--
%(real_name)s
As a medium, film suffers in comparison to digital in that it is less capable
of low light reproduction and when pushed, image quality drops precipitously.
The solution has always been larger formats. My best film work was generally on
6x7 or 6x6 film. Half a f a 35 mm frame has no appeal
Am 03.03.24 um 18:29 schrieb Bill:
I was quite surprised that it is a vertical half frame, but the logic
behind that decision is that a vertical format is what the target
market is already comfortable with.
Making it a horizontal half frame would mean transporting the film from
top to bottom
Am 03.03.24 um 18:39 schrieb Doug Brewer:
Grain is indeed part of the allure.
In an earlier life, I used to shoot expired Tri X at 3200 and process it
in Diafine, mostly because it was cheap and simple. You don't get much
grainier than that.
Ralf
--
Ralf R. Radermacher - Köln/Cologne,
Am 03.03.24 um 16:16 schrieb Bob W PDML:
Yes. You’re not part of the target market. It’s aimed at young people who are
using it for fun.
If shooting grainy photos is fun then let them have it. :-)
Ralf
--
%(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
To unsubscribe send an email
> On 03/03/2024 15:04 GMT Comcast wrote:
>
>
> As a medium, film suffers in comparison to digital in that it is less capable
> of low light reproduction and when pushed, image quality drops precipitously.
> The solution has always been larger formats. My best film work was generally
> on
My take is this: Pentax has a history of zigging while others are
zagging.The demographic of the majority of those getting into film today
are people who have been raised knowing nothing but digital - those to whom
film is something new and different. (It's the Dr. Seuss book Star-Bellied
On 3/3/2024 9:04 AM, Comcast wrote:
As a medium, film suffers in comparison to digital in that it is less capable
of low light reproduction and when pushed, image quality drops precipitously.
The solution has always been larger formats. My best film work was generally on
6x7 or 6x6 film.
Grain is indeed part of the allure.
On 3/3/24 10:51 AM, Ralf R Radermacher wrote:
Am 03.03.24 um 16:16 schrieb Bob W PDML:
Yes. You’re not part of the target market. It’s aimed at young people
who are using it for fun.
If shooting grainy photos is fun then let them have it. :-)
Ralf
--
> Am I missing something here?
Yes. You’re not part of the target market. It’s aimed at young people who are
using it for fun.
> On 3 Mar 2024, at 15:07, Comcast wrote:
>
> As a medium, film suffers in comparison to digital in that it is less
> capable of low light reproduction and when
I have been using Lightroom since 2005, and it has worked well. There are
over 50,000 photos in my library. Last week I upgraded the Mac OS to Sonoma
14.1.2, and upgraded LrC to 13.1.
All hell broke loose. Since the upgrades LrC simply doesn't work: opening a
library opens only a fraction of the
Rick, I'm home working on some edits. Drop me an email if you like and
I'd be glad to offer what guidance I can.
On 3/3/24 11:00 AM, Rick Womer wrote:
I have been using Lightroom since 2005, and it has worked well. There are
over 50,000 photos in my library. Last week I upgraded the Mac OS to
More on PetaPixel:
https://petapixel.com/2024/02/29/pentaxs-brand-new-film-camera-will-lauch-this-summer/
> On 3 Mar 2024, at 09:01, Henk Terhell wrote:
>
> More news on the Pentax film camera:
> https://youtu.be/xqRQTOkhOJU?si=PssAjafiIoYaxbuW
>
> As for me, with a least a dozen film
More news on the Pentax film camera:
https://youtu.be/xqRQTOkhOJU?si=PssAjafiIoYaxbuW
As for me, with a least a dozen film camera's accumulating dust on the
shelf is not fair to these to invest in a new one.
Henk
--
%(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
To unsubscribe send an email to
> On Mar 3, 2024, at 9:29 AM, Bill wrote:
>
>
> On 3/3/2024 9:04 AM, Comcast wrote:
>> As a medium, film suffers in comparison to digital in that it is less
>> capable of low light reproduction and when pushed, image quality drops
>> precipitously. The solution has always been larger
On 3/3/2024 11:49 AM, Ralf R Radermacher wrote:
Am 03.03.24 um 18:39 schrieb Doug Brewer:
Grain is indeed part of the allure.
In an earlier life, I used to shoot expired Tri X at 3200 and process
it in Diafine, mostly because it was cheap and simple. You don't get
much grainier than that.
Thanks, Doug. I’d love to “pick your brain”!
Church and a memorial service ate up today. Tomorrow is pretty clear;
mid-to-late morning or after 2 in the afternoon would be best for me.
On Sun, Mar 3, 2024 at 13:20 Doug Brewer wrote:
> Rick, I'm home working on some edits. Drop me an email
On 3/3/2024 2:21 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
You mean that there are people who think that photography is actually fun?
Some of us still do it for the joy of doing it rather than treating it
as some sort of chore where we need to post one masterpiece per day in
Instagram.
I was quite
> On Mar 3, 2024, at 1:34 PM, Bill wrote:
>> If Ricoh were really thinking outside the box, they would take a film SLR
>> and replace the focusing screen with a sensor. The viewfinder would be
>> electronic, and it would be able to take digital images either as proofs or
>> cheap snaps,
22 matches
Mail list logo
