good to see you again.
Doug
At 11:43 PM +010012/18/02, Raimo Korhonen wrote, or at least typed:
For the last 5-6 weeks I have been to Estonia once a week (and once to Ventspils,
Latvia) so I unsubscribed. Now I am back, with my grumpy self relatively unchanged.
All the best!
Raimo
Personal
How do you see yourself? Strictly rhetorical, of course...
http://www.winternet.com/~mikelr/flame1.html
I'm sorry, Cesar. Please don't whip me no more.
At 08:14 AM 12/26/02 -0500, you wrote:
Taking time off!!! Back into the bowels of the establishment for you!!! I
guess the daily whippings will have to increase :')
Being the list guy, doesn't that make the rest of the words redundant???
Hmmm,
example of why it's sometimes a good idea to get someone else to edit
At 10:44 PM -050012/28/02, tom wrote, or at least typed:
I didn't see any comment on this, so I post it again...another ad from
Modern bride Washington that's definitely more unique than mine:
Welcome to the PDML. We're glad you're here.
At 12:19 PM 1/8/03, you wrote:
Hello, everybody ...
I have just joined the list today after reading it for about a
week. Please allow me to introduce myself.
My name is Marcel, and I have been involved inphotography for many years.
SNIP
Be sure and send Mike lots of kitten and flower photos in email. It makes
his day.
Doug
always helpful
At 02:38 PM 1/8/03, you wrote:
Hi!
Mike, I'd like to talk to you off the forum. Since I realize that you
may be getting numerous e-mails on daily basis I am asking your
permission
=damn=
At 12:27 AM -05001/11/03, Otis Wright, Jr. wrote, or at least typed:
I don't think this sells. It may be true, but the general or periodic use
of profanity for effect is not effective in general, in my opinion.
I've worked with exceptional people all my life. They account for a small
Try Microfrontier's Color It!,
http://www.microfrontier.com/products/colorit40/index.html
At 6:53 PM -08001/11/03, Keith Whaley wrote:
I'd much rather use something else...
keith whaley
--
Douglas Forrest Brewer
Ashwood Lake Photography
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.alphoto.com
Is it legal to enlarge squirrels?
Doug
has nothing useful to say
At 10:06 AM 1/16/03, Gregory wrote:
Film has better resolution than digital, until around 11 or 14 megapixels.
But film has grain in a small number of colors while digital has xxx bit
pixels with noise. And I think you can just
What was the misinformation about Pentax and Casio? I think I missed that.
At 08:55 AM 1/17/03, Rick Diaz claimed:
Let's be clear. Some pro-photographers want to make
you think they like digitals because they are being
paid for to say so. Much like some pros who claimed
that APS format is
You are a Camera Purchase Consultant? What a cool job. Does it pay well?
At 09:07 AM 1/17/03, Rick Diaz claimed:
Then theres the question of hyping something the
very same person is prone to.
I have to second that..
Unfortunately in my consulting business, my people who
came to me for
three-dimensional evidence of further debt. What a novel concept. Good
thing it was misinformation.
At 09:38 AM 1/18/03, William Robb claimed:
- Original Message -
From: Doug Brewer
Subject: Re: Can digital beat 6x7? Answer seems to be yes
What was the misinformation about Pentax
I believe Bob Blakely is the originator of Har.
At 01:53 PM 1/17/03, you wrote:
Think of a pirate laughing Har, har, har It has become a PDML term that
means. I am pulling your leg. When I came on the list Weathfield Willie
(Bill Robb) was using it a lot, but he says he picked it up from
heywaitaminute. who said I was a nice guy?
At 02:00 PM 1/17/03, tv ejaculated:
It's laughter, but the kind of laugh you make after you've said
something slightly inflammatory, stupid, or provacative.
Like, Doug Brewer is a nice guy, but I wouldn't trust him around my
600/4.
HAR
I talked to a friend with Pentax this week. He confirmed Casio's involvement.
I'd guess you've been fed some misinformation.
Doug
At 9:40 PM -08001/17/03, Rick Diaz wrote, or at least typed:
One way is to get confirmation from Pentax themselves.
Pentax has always denied that they worked
Picture this, Steve:
One tripod.
One asphalt path.
One $7500 Pentax SMCP-FA* 250-600mm f/5.6 ED IF.
Gravity.
Bottom line: it happens.
Doug
At 09:45 AM 1/22/03, you wrote:
Yes, I feel pretty crappy about the lens! I`m the one that broke
Frank`s lens. Now I`m probably out at least $100 to
Do we =really= need to start up another guns/weapons/geopolitical
penis-measuring debate?
I would vote no.
At 01:05 PM 1/23/03, you wrote:
William Robb wrote:
What is the time span needed for something to be called a weapon of mass
destruction (if we are going to put the term into the
Congratulations, Arnold. Now is when the fun begins.
At 01:38 PM 1/23/03, you wrote:
I woul happily like to share with the list the reason for which I could
not (as had been planned) join Boz on his successfull Pentax Day, which I
had arranged:
Even for a Pentax enthusiast sometimes there are
As of Oct 1, 2002, it's pronounced Pentax.
At 11:29 AM 1/23/03, you wrote:
Is it AHH-sah-HEE or ahh-SAH-high or something else entirely?
Dan Scott
Though we've had our differences, which I truly regret, I hate to see you
go, as I hate to lose any of our members. Good luck in your endeavors and
remember that you are always welcome on the PDML.
Doug
former Dart Swinger owner
At 04:39 PM 1/31/03, you wrote:
After exactly three years on
I'd like to thank you, Bill, for your reminder that all Americans are evil and deserve
all the tragedies that come our way. I'd especially like to thank you for reminding us
here on the Pentax list, where we are supposed to celebrate our commonality as people
and photographers no matter our
At 10:28 AM +01002/2/03, Arnold Stark wrote, or at least typed:
Hello Doug,
I'm not inconsistent. My position has been and will continue to be that politics has
no place here on the PDML.
Would you say the same if we had PDML members in Bagdad?
I do not keep up with where members live. If
They can't hold it without me.
Doug
at least, that's what I tell myself
At 03:22 PM 2/7/03, you wrote:
Who else is planning to make it?
ya know, if you want to talk about photography, you just have to introduce the
subject. seems simple enough, dunnit?
At 9:07 PM +2/9/03, Paul Stenquist wrote, or at least typed:
I've been spending some time on usefilm. com. I was originally drawn
there by the flower photo contest (sorry
Does it? I'd sure like to see some examples you've done with Portra 800.
Doug
At 4:24 PM -08002/9/03, Matt Greene wrote, or at least typed:
I have no idea of what film sped you were using. But
Iimprovesilm inproves your chances over any other
speeds. Nearly any camera/flash combination
Welcome back, Mafud.
At 9:14 PM -08002/10/03, Matt Greene wrote, or at least typed:
While it may be obvious that one 35mm print or another
may be discernable from Medium Format, a properly
exposed, properly focused 35mm negative, say Portra
160, when properly printed, can easily rival a
okay, just to get this clear. I don't have time to watch ebay every day, and generally
just glance at it every week or so, less often if I'm busy, so I have a question.
If I hop over to ebay and stumble across an incredible deal, say, a 67II system that
my next door neighbor is selling because
my own personal opinion, Bruce (and it's just between the two of us), having shot a
few miles of MF and a few more miles of 35mm, is that a good photo will overcome its
format.
Doug
At 9:53 PM -08002/10/03, Bruce Dayton wrote, or at least typed:
Doug,
Yeah, I was trying to figure out
might as well trot these out again:
http://www.alphoto.com/floral1.jpg
http://www.alphoto.com/floral4.jpg
Doug
At 01:31 PM 2/11/03, Wendy wrote:
Here's mine
http://pug.komkon.org/02jul/tulip.html
---
natural light, yup.
thanks,
Doug
At 02:47 PM 2/11/03, you wrote:
Very nice, Doug(for colour) vbg
Natural light i assume.
Dave
Mafud, I'd sure like to see some samples of those hot-selling flower photos. Can we
see some of them online? Or let us know your fair schedule so we can come out and see
them.
Doug
At 4:19 PM -08002/11/03, Mafud, wearing his Matt Greene disguise, wrote, or at
least typed:
some stuff about
This just in from Chris Brogden:
A friend of mine is looking to buy or rent a Pentax stereo adapter, the kind
that fit onto the front of a lens to allow for stereo photography. He
doesn't need the stereo viewer, just the adapter that fits on the lens.
He's working within a pretty tight
At 12:41 PM 2/12/03, Mafud wrote:
I used to be a photographer at dog shows. It took
about two shows for me to discover that most of the
male professional handlers and groomers, even a vet or
two, were homosexuals. A lot of Hair Stylists,
barbers and Cosmetologists are Gay;
but you already knew
At 01:20 PM 2/12/03, Mark wrote:
Probably he's just in a bad mood because of being hit on by a gay
florist. And because Pentax is about to switch to a
totally-non-backwards-compatible lens mount and send special agents into
all our homes to confiscate all our old-style k-mount gear.
Tempers get
...anyone who has recently come into my crosshairs for off-topic behavior
is now free to take advantage of this one-time offer to take me to task for
my recent savaging of Mafudkirklandmatt, if you so desire.
order before midnight tomorrow.
operators are standing by
yr hmbl svt
Doug
You just can't trust those old cameras.
Doug
sorry, David. Hope you get it fixed.
At 7:16 AM -07009/16/01, David S. wrote, or at least typed:
My LX shutter totally failed while in the Canadian Rockies. It failed while
at 1/250 in manual mode. Battery removal or inserting new batteries does
Here are a couple reasons:
http://www.alphoto.com/floral1.jpg
http://www.alphoto.com/floral4.jpg
Later,
Doug
--
Douglas Forrest Brewer
Ashwood Lake Photography
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.alphoto.com
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to
Short answer: Nope.
Long answer: I just dropped close to three bills on the last format change, so unless
you can script it and get it installed without involving anyone on our server, it
won't get done, unless you want to pay for it.
Thanks,
Doug
At 10:36 AM -040010/3/01, [EMAIL
And, you'll recall, I traded an SF-10 for one.
Doug
nyah nyah nyah
At 6:29 PM -040010/3/01, Aaron Reynolds wrote, or at least typed:
Clive Williams wrote:
Still waiting to stumble on that irresistible-bargain LX,
Take heart, I am living proof that they're out there. (Found one for
$400
The Plaza de España is well worth a visit, as is the adjacent park. If you get time to
visit outside the city, I'd recommend Arcos de la Frontera, an absolutely stunning
puebla blanca not too awfully far away.
Doug
At 10:14 AM +10/18/01, MZ3_fella _ wrote, or at least typed:
I'm off to
This came to me, meant for the list.
FWIW, I absolutely disagree with Frantisek's description of thens. I've had one since
they came out, and have never had any trouble manually focusing with it.
Doug
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Fast 35mm Lenses
Date: Thu, 25
Good shape. Comes with a grip strap. $300 + shipping gets it.
help me fund my jump to medium format.
Doug
--
Douglas Forrest Brewer
Ashwood Lake Photography
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.alphoto.com
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net
It's a conspiracy. There are dozens of computer operators sitting around waiting for a
search request to come down the pipe. When it does, they choose which of the messages
shall be returned with full text and which only get the headline treatment. What's
really impressive is that this is all
Well, duh. Of course they are.
Doug
At 8:27 PM -050011/12/01, Mark Roberts wrote, or at least typed:
You forgot to mention that the conspiritors are stationed in satellites
positioned in geosynchronous orbits.
--
Mark Roberts
www.robertstech.com
--
Douglas Forrest Brewer
Ashwood Lake
Whatever problems going on at mail-archive.com have absolutely nothing to do with the
PDML server. The PDML server is fine. There is nothing wrong with the PDML server. One
more time: The PDML server is healthy and happy.
I spend a lot of time and not a little money keeping the PDML server
Haven't I answered this before?
The huge reason is that majordomo does not have this capacity. Since it doesn't,
someone would have to build a hack. That someone would have to be someone other than
me, because A.) I have no time and B.) I have no interest in spending the time to
build a
I'm going out of town for the holiday weekend. Hope all of you find much for which to
be thankful, especially those here in the States.
Have fun,
Doug
--
Douglas Forrest Brewer
Ashwood Lake Photography
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.alphoto.com
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail
I'm right here, Bill, and my address is healthy, thanks. Whatcha need?
Doug
At 8:40 PM -060011/27/01, William Robb wrote, or at least typed:
Hi:
Sorry to bother the list about this, but I need Doug Brewer's
email address. I still have the alphoto.com address which is not
correct.
Thanks
Bill,
Let me join the others in thanking you for your excellent work on the PUG. I salute
you for your longevity, thank you for your passion, and admire you for your technical
achievements. Like Steve and Mark before, you will always be able to say that the PUG
is in some ways better for your
Mike didn't say he didn't know how to use a manual flash.
Doug
At 4:19 PM -050011/30/01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote, or at least typed:
Hey Mike!
You forgot your camera and there is a function you could shoot but you only
have access to a 283 with a broken sensor and a K1000, meaning raw
I bought my copy in 1991 at Southerland Photo in Huntsville, Alabama.
Doug
At 10:03 PM -050012/1/01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote, or at least typed:
I'm wondering when the guide went on sale. Through 1997, it was a part of the
literature my KODAK freely dealer passed out?
Mafud
--
Douglas
Given the general collapse of the home.com empire, I was about to nuke everyone with
that domain in his or her account, when it occurred to me that there may still be a
few survivors.
So if anyone is left on the home.com net, please drop me a line in the next day or
so and I'll spare you.
Six this time.
Grab a chance to see samples of my broad range of photographic interests before I get
serious about this whole website thing and concentrate my efforts on returning to the
portrait world, after which, of course, I'll bombard you with samples of portraits.
Later,
Doug
web
Bill,
The Out Front shot was done on Kodak 100VS.
I examined the original Out Back slide and the bright spot in there is not quite as
pronounced, so you can consider that a scanner inconsistency. I may try to rescan it
to see if I can get it better.
Doug
At 9:55 PM -080012/11/01, Bill
Thanks, I like that photo too. I'm also a big fan of splash pages.
Doug
At 7:07 AM -050012/12/01, C or B Waters wrote, or at least typed:
Doug,
I like the photo on your splash page but I HATE splash pages in theory.
Good work otherwise!:)
--
Douglas Forrest Brewer
Ashwood Lake Photography
Mark, I'm especially proud of Irvinton Parlor, because I also designed and set up
that display to take advantage of the excellent natural lighting in the parlor.
Thanks,
Doug
At 9:44 PM -050012/12/01, Mark Roberts wrote, or at least typed:
They're all nice but I really love Irvinton
Thanks, Anand. I don't mean I'm going to stop taking these photos, just that I need to
get back to business and get a serious site going for my portrait work.
Doug
At 10:26 AM -050012/12/01, Anand DHUPKAR wrote, or at least typed:
don't go to portrature again :) just kiddng.
all of them
Thanks very much, Joe. The photographic possibilities were included in the list of
things that attracted us here, I just wish I had more time to fully explore them.
Doug
At 8:20 PM -070012/12/01, Joseph Tainter wrote, or at least typed:
I like them all, but I love out back. It is wonderful
Three weekends?!?
wimp.
At 9:33 PM -050012/21/01, Bill Owens wrote, or at least typed:
After three weekends of taking Portraits With Santa I have gained a
tremendous amount of respect for those that have to do this sort of thing
for a living. About half of the kids were scared, crying or
At 10:17 AM 10/9/03, throwing caution to the wind, jerome wrote:
some stuff
you were gone?
On Tuesday, October 14, 2003, at 06:42 PM, Cameron Hood wrote:
Some of my posts are not making it to my copy of the digest, and yet
other people are responding to them, so they are obviously getting
them, perhaps only in individual emails. I sent out 3 tests yesterday,
and none of them went
On Tuesday, October 14, 2003, at 05:52 PM, Feroze Kistan wrote:
Hi All,
I'm currently doing a course in wedding photography. One of the things
that
came up and which I forgot to ask was: we were told that the studio
lights
had been set for f/11 and that we should set our cameras to f/8, why
On Thursday, October 16, 2003, at 11:28 PM, frank theriault wrote:
I should hope so. Someone has to drive us home. vbg
-frank
PS: Seriously, I'm a much better talker than a drinker. I'll be
passed out on the floor at about 8:30, after my second beer. vbg
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Are
At 02:07 PM 10/17/03, throwing caution to the wind, Cotty wrote:
What is a pro bag?
it's black, natch.
At 09:51 AM 10/20/03, throwing caution to the wind, Kevin Waterson wrote:
I took a few test snaps of a girl with a cigarette.
I used a black backdrop to try to highlight the smoke but
I think I need to do more.
Any tips or advice greatfully appreciated.
You can see the test snaps here
On Monday, October 20, 2003, at 06:17 PM, Kevin Waterson wrote:
My lighting was set up with two heads with 2 stops difference placed
like
subject
|__|
Light Light
At 02:06 PM 10/29/03, throwing caution to the wind, jtainter wrote:
Will Robb wrote:
'Plural of LX is LXs.
As in, I have three LXs.'
So, Wheatfield, do you have:
A flock of LXs?
A herd of LXs?
A gaggle of LXs?
An exaltation of LXs?
Grammarians on the list, please help.
Joe
a coven
Reel him in, Jerome. He went for it.
At 09:57 AM 11/10/03, throwing caution to the wind, William Robb wrote:
Well, you just fucked yourself as far as I am concerned.
You are either trying to sell defective equipment, or you are too stupid to
live.
Either way, I wouldn't be buying equipment from
On Monday, November 10, 2003, at 09:29 PM, Joseph Tainter wrote:
Yesterday I tried my Tokina AT-X AF 400 f5.6 on the *ist D. Well,
Pentax Photo Browser identifies the lens as smc Pentax-F
35-70mmF3.5-4.5 and the focal length as 400 mm. Earth calling
Pentax
Joe
How is it a Pentax problem
we gonna pitch a bitch at 11:30
Doug obscure references R us Brewer
At 07:47 AM 11/14/03, throwing caution to the wind, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Yep, I'm in a mood to rant a little ... and it ain't even Sunday
Snip
Okay, everyone, listen up. Shel only wants us to talk about what Shel is
interested in. Before you send a post to the list, please send it to Shel
At 11:06 AM 11/14/03, throwing caution to the wind, tom wrote:
The really imopressive catalog is the *lighting* book. Omigawd.
tv
Yeah, that's a fun book.
Doug snoots... Brewer
At 08:44 AM 11/18/03, throwing caution to the wind, Bill Owens wrote:
We'll need some veils and a snake :-)
NO! That may cause tv and Jessica to Belly Dance.
Bill
I could handle Jessica belly dancing.
At 11:46 AM 11/20/03, throwing caution to the wind, Bill Owens wrote:
One of the members of our church asked for a copy of this. The first sale
of one of my images. Little Brown Church in the Vale:
http://groups.msn.com/BillOwensPhotos/shoebox.msnw?action=ShowPhotoPhotoID=47
Bill
woohoo. Now
boy, now =there= is a straight line...
Couple things:
I had the extreme good fortune to receive a visit from the currently
hobbled E Reed, late of the PDML, and her entourage, including spouse
and two exceptional offspring. It was truly an honor for me.
It is possibly true that young Mrs.
On Tuesday, December 2, 2003, at 09:13 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm back.
As am I. Been back for a couple of days, but pretty busy.
I was glad to get to meet you and the family, Eleanor.
Doug
On Sunday, December 7, 2003, at 05:14 PM, Cotty wrote:
On 7/12/03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
Their website is:
http://www.grandfather.com/events/nphoto.htm#register
AFAIK the only way to register is to send them a check or money
order. No
credit cards accepted anywhere on the mountain.
At 02:57 PM 12/8/03, throwing caution to the wind, Cotty wrote:
Okay, here's a poser for you *ist D users. What's the maddest lens you've
had on your Pentax DSLR?
Gotta be the A*135mm f/1.8 ? Anyone tried that?
Anyone using the brilliant A*85mm f/1.4?
Anyone tried the 600 f/4?
Anyone mad as a
At 03:44 PM 12/8/03, throwing caution to the wind, Mark Roberts wrote:
At GFM, we'll be running the istd on a Tak 1000/8...
It's a portrait lens for shy people.
Last time Bill Fortney was at GFM, I pitched a new book idea to him--
Portraits From 500 Feet-- but he didn't bite.
There's always
At 11:56 AM 12/10/03, throwing caution to the wind, Peter Jordan wrote:
I live in a village in Scotland and my home address gives much amusement to
locals when people try to pronounce it.
I live in a place called Haugh of Urr. Prize to any correct
pronunications.
um...hoover?
Culzean Castle
Begin forwarded message:
Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by
Ross Cidlowski ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) on Thursday, December 11, 2003
at 18:06:19
comments: hi im looking for famous photos or famous events taken with
a pentax camera for a research project. please
you're a fun guy, bob.
At 4:59 PM -07009/18/02, Robert Woerner wrote, or at least typed:
Hi Amita,
Thanks for the suggestion of using go.com for free email.
One day later and I'm still subscribed to the list.
Again, thanks,
With regard,
Robert Woerner
--
Douglas Forrest Brewer
Ashwood
bob,
ouch. I'm stung. I think you should demand your money back.
Even though I am under no obligation whatsoever to come up with a way to
deal with Hotmail's massive inefficiency, that's what I've been trying to
do. I'd like to take this opportunity to thank you for willingness to work
with
Haven't we already had this discussion?
Surely there's some place on AOL explaining how to tell the difference between email
and a web site.
At 9:54 AM -04009/30/02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote, or at least typed:
Is it possible to number the topics and corresponding subject messages. This is
Subscription Information
To subscribe to the mailinglist, simply send a
message
with the word 'subscribe' in the Subject: field
to the
-request address of that list
Instructions are on http://www.pdml.net on the services page.
At 8:42 PM -03009/30/02, Margo Ellen Gesser wrote, or at least typed:
Dear Petaxians,
It's not that I don't enjoy all these messages, but things are getting busy
for me and I need to desubscribe. So far, all my requests have
There is a problem with the digest, and it's being addressed.
Thanks,
Doug
At 02:13 PM 10/3/02 -0400, you wrote:
I'll tell you know - the answer's probably.
I've not been getting any digests for the last two days. I switched one of
my e-mail accounts to individual mails and that works okay.
There is a digest issue that's being worked on.
thanks,
Doug
At 12:33 PM 10/3/02 +0200, you wrote:
For Doug the list guy;
several people have problems with their normal subscriptions.
Is there any info we can pass on?
Best,
Jostein
-- Original Message
wheee
--
Douglas Forrest Brewer
Ashwood Lake Photography
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.alphoto.com
yalt
dang reply-to function is tripping out
yeah, that may be true, but the bad news is that the nikon list is
populated by mindless wienies.
At 01:24 PM 10/9/02 -0400, you wrote:
snip
So, I got this from the Nikon list (which can take a lickin' but keep on
tickin' - sorry Doug):
more snippage
Why? Did it suddenly stop working when Pål posted about the rumored new
flagship?
At 12:52 PM 10/18/02 -0400, Brad wrote:
Why am I increasing aware that I got suckered when purchasing my MZ-S?
grumble
wheee
Well...sure.
At 3:14 AM +100010/27/02, Rob Studdert wrote, or at least typed:
After a quick whip-around to cover the air fare :-)
Rob Studdert
--
Douglas Forrest Brewer
Ashwood Lake Photography
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.alphoto.com
Of course it does. I've never had a single problem with Pentax service.
DB
At 9:22 PM -040010/26/02, Rubenstein, Bruce M (Bruce) wrote, or at least typed:
They don't need any fancy bugs, since Pentax service doesn't exist in North America.
BR
--
Douglas Forrest Brewer
Ashwood Lake
Don't tell anyone I was taking a break from working on the list. Some people think I'm
not allowed.
You can call volume portraiture a lot of things, but boring it ain't. You do learn a
lot about lighting and posing, and you learn to make quick decisions. Don't take this
the wrong way, but I
Good grief, a boat from Japan to Canada sank in the Atlantic Ocean? That
would take some serious doing.
Brad, just order from someone else. You could have ordered it from a
hundred other outlets by now.
Doug
At 04:22 PM 10/30/02 -0500, you wrote:
Hey folks,
Well, today, went in to my camera
I have several Macs, thanks. But if you want, I'd like one of those dual G4
rigs with a flat screen and a graphics pad. Send it to my home. Of course,
the list is run on a big Unix box, so maybe you can get me one of those.
That would be cool.
Let's think about this. If the archives are
1 - 100 of 2791 matches
Mail list logo
