Group,
I'm floating my new website for your review.
I welcome your candid impression of the look of the
site, but primarily, the work itself.
I value your collective opinions.
www.photolightimages.com
Jack
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Get personalized
Note: forwarded message attached.
Posters,
This forward will, hopefully, provide a more
expeditious URL for your convenience in accessing my
site:
http:www.photolightimages.com
As must be obvious, I encourage your comments.
Thanks,
Jack
__
The chorus,
It doesn't seem that complicated to me. That reads as
a condescending pompous statement from one who assumes
special insights. Maybe I'm too uncomplicated.
When anyone reads a critique of his/her work, each
word sears the sole. Glowing adjectives intoxicate
with delight and
.
I'll be following the pack.
Regards,
Jack Davis
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net
Jeff,
I believe you advised us that moon rise in SF would be
at 104 degrees on a given date. I don't recall the
date at the moment, but it has no bearing on my
question.
Do we consider due east or west as 90 degrees? If so,
would we then add degrees as the angle falls to the
south, thus placing
Thanks, Frank!
Best of the season to you. Have you been a good enough boy this year to
hope that Santa might bring you a new home computer? (I don't know that
we need details). LOL
Jack
--- frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We're likely a couple of hours from shutting down at the office
As stated, it means that it can apply to either viewpoint.
Well said!
Jack
--- Tim Øsleby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What does that tell you?
Honestly? It confuses me.
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
The wife and I are planning a couple of double BB's in front of the
fireplace. just prior to a long winter's nap.
NOEL ALL!
Jack
--- Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sounds like fun. I've had the Mt. Veeder Zin. Maybe not that vintage,
but I remember it as a very good wine with high
Probably an even larger share believe that human activity is, in large
part, the cause of the 'increased rate' of global warming.
I understand science generally holds to the theory that the earth is
locked in a cycle of either cooling or warming. IOW, it's always doing
one or the other.
Jack
---
We have the right to live unless the Judge says otherwise!
Jack
--- Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is no right to live, there is a right to attempt to live. If
you
had the right to live you could not die.
Now you're treading into religion's territory.
Tom C.
--
PDML
I think I see..yes I do, a Canon neck strap on the helper. Well, we
don't know what's hanging on it, so will give him the benefit of the
doubt. LG)
Helper appears to be proud of his son (?) and wants him to properly
togged out for the ceremony'.
Extremely nice moment well caught!
Jack
--- Peter
Appears you had not other choice, but it really doesn't need the dull
brown leaf(S).
I think I'd somewhat prefer the ice pattern only, although I wonder if
there's enough, in total, for it to stand on it's own.
Interesting and well seen, however.
Jack
--- Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Snow exposures very well done. Enjoyed the peek and can appreciate the
wide edge to edge performance of the 16~45 at 20mm setting.
Jack
--- Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nice to see some photos... strange to see snow in Corrales! I know it
does, I've just never been there while
Coat hangers can be very useful, huh?
Cute!
Jack
--- DagT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just a small report from the real world...
http://foto.no/cgi-bin/bildekritikk/vis_bilde.cgi?id=280783
DagT
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Wind?
Jack
--- Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks all for thr comments on the photo. I may play with contrast a
bit
more.
I was surprised how this pudde of water had frozen in apparently
successive
stages evidenced by the concentric rings. I've seen it before but
don't
quite
Gives me the feeling that all are hunkered down in their births 'til
those clouds have done their thing.
Like the mast and transom perspective.
I realize you didn't use flash, but the slightly left side lighting
made me wonder originally. Detracts from the piece of the image to
some extent.
Jack
Obviously, no tougher test than ISO 1600 in fading light against a
shadowy darkish blotched background.
If this is an example of how bad it can get..I'm certainly OK with it.
I, also, appreciate your choice of subjects, Paul. 8-)
Jack
--- Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A bit more
Pentax cold turkey withdrawal?
J
--- Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
P. J. Alling wrote:
Mark Roberts wrote:
Mike Hamilton wrote:
Anyone care to share?
I'm a secret agent.
Sorry, I can't tell you any more...
... or you'd have to kill us?
Oh no, a fate *worse* than
Weii seen. Like the composition.
Small knit with the blown out upper left skylight area.
Jack
--- P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another shot taken between Christmas and New Years. I went out with
a
friend for a ramble in New Haven, CT. The Yale students, in fact the
students
Ya throw a little fertilizer on a dirty scalp and ya never know what
will sprout.
Jack
--- frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/2/07, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm sure that Frank will appreciate the thought. I'm not sure the
lady
will...
Why, I oughtta...!!!
I gather the 1600 ISO is the third shot down? Nice image and, at a
quick glance, the sharpest of the group. Likely a faster shutter.(?)
Jack
--- William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While the fellas were out for their evening constitutional, I looked
at the
heavens and saw a very clear sky
Ditto.
J
--- Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It might be time to re-calibrate the monitor. Thanks for the
mention.
--
Bruce
Thursday, January 4, 2007, 6:10:32 AM, you wrote:
SB Bruce,
SB I forgot to mention that I see a distinct bluish cast to the
photo. Do you
SB see
Tom!(?)
J
--- Kenneth Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For those still shooting film of the slide variety, I received a note
from
Fuji advising that Velvia will again be made available.
Kenneth Waller
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Nice soft lighting. Weed stalk placement is ideal.
The tracked snow and dark piece of something, however, seem out of
place and substantially detract from the total scene. IMO
Jack
--- Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Taken in Utah very late in the day. The sky was hazed over and the
sun
unavailability and then reappearance?
Tom C.
From: Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: OT: Velvia available again
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 18:46:24 -0800 (PST)
Tom!(?)
J
--- Kenneth Waller
PROTECTED] wrote:
That's good. To tell the truth I was unaware Velvia was not
available. I do
have quite a bit of 220 and 135 in the freezer.
What was the cause of it's unavailability and then reappearance?
Tom C.
From: Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply
).
People were not enthused with the altered colour balance with 100,
which Fuji had done to prevent Rockwell Lobster Syndrome. Velvia 50
II supposedly will have the classic Velvia balance and punch, but the
easier scanning of the new Provia's.
-Adam
Jack Davis wrote:
Fuji ran short of gag hues
I remember her fumbling with a duck (I believe it was) 'til she finally
managed to drop it on the floor.
Might have been affected by the copious amount of wine she continuously
poured herself.
Jack
--- Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I bought two DVD sets of Julia Child's cooking show from the
I much prefer the background snow field and shadows in this one. I
think, however, you should trade the stalks in #1 for these disheveled
twigs. =))
Jack
--- Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am curious as to your thoughts of this one, compared to the first
winter scene. Of the two, I
then poured a glass and said it should be a eaten
with a
nice dry white wine, like a Reisling.
I thought, REISLING? DRY? :-)
Tom C.
From: Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: OT - The French
LOL I've always found ducks very difficult to retain myself.
Jack
--- keith_w [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jack Davis wrote:
I remember her fumbling with a duck (I believe it was) 'til she
finally
managed to drop it on the floor.
Might have been affected by the copious amount of wine she
I found it close to impossible to make that happen. That's why I sold
my shotgun last fall.
I've shot a good many that are retained on film, however.
Jack
Jack
--- Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's not too hard if they're dead.
Paul
On Jan 5, 2007, at 6:00 PM, Jack Davis wrote
Lighting, especially with reflections, is very nice.
I'd have to crop out the lower right boat transom and suck up the
scene. Then moving slightly to the left and shooting back a little to
the right to get more of a look at the transom line of the string of
boats on the right. Maybe I'd hate the
PROTECTED] wrote:
Jack Davis wrote:
Lighting, especially with reflections, is very nice.
I'd have to crop out the lower right boat transom and suck up the
scene. Then moving slightly to the left and shooting back a little
to
the right to get more of a look at the transom line of the string
Thanks Cotty for being there for me.
Jack
--- Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/1/07, Boris Liberman, discombobulated, unleashed:
Jack, what does it mean transom?
Jack's not here, but a transom is the flat back end of a boat.
A gold star to anyone who knows what a painter is (no
Thanks Cotty for being there for me.
Jack
--- Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/1/07, Boris Liberman, discombobulated, unleashed:
Jack, what does it mean transom?
Jack's not here, but a transom is the flat back end of a boat.
A gold star to anyone who knows what a painter is (no
Now, Boris seems to be missing. Ya better get ready to cover, Sweety.
Jack
--- Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/1/07, Jack Davis, discombobulated, unleashed:
Thanks Cotty for being there for me.
Well someone has to.
Darling.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O
Very nice shot. I 'think' I'd like it even better if I could make out
slightly more of the foreground stream detail.
It would be a delicate balance with the lighted hills and am only
wondering about the effect.
Thanks for the look.
Jack
--- SJ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi,
on a ride through
Now that's quite a reach.
Jack
--- Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Arrrgh, that be a rope tied to the bow of me ship, so I can
tie
her up to the dock.
Cap'n Bob
Ahar Cap'n. Well done sir.
I didn't think you'd have a clew.
Perhaps he should take a bow?
...or
Buoy this line is going adrift. Think I'll go mix something on the
rocks.
Jack
--- Paul Sorenson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Time for this thread to take another tack...
-P
Jack Davis wrote:
Now that's quite a reach.
Jack
--- Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Arrrgh
Nicely seen, Bruce.
I think it would, also, work well if the horizontal span were cropped
off. It might even make a more intriguing statement.
Jack
--- Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Taken on a morning walk yesterday.
Pentax K10D, A 70-210/4, Handheld
ISO 400, f/8
The K10D can be a great camera, especially as a tool for one with
visual acuity together with technical savvy, as is true in this case.
Very nice, Paul.
Jack
--- Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I did some pics at the North American International Auto Show today.
I have a lot of pics
Paul, what was the lighting source? Did you have to deal with highlight
removal in post processing? Did you light it?
Striking shot.
Jack
--- Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I did some pics at the North American International Auto Show today.
I have a lot of pics and have only
An ice rink location where something went terribly wrong?
Jack
--- Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5435439
Tom C.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Ken,
Is it your feeling that theses rebated apply only to purchases directly
from Pentax? I don't see them associated with a couple I checked at
BH.
Jack
--- K.Takeshita [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.pentaximaging.com/purchase/rebates_offers/
Ken
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Pentax does allow product purchases, but at higher price levels. I just
checked the DA 12~24 and noted their $100 current rebate offer. Their
starting price, $899.
Jack
--- K.Takeshita [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/11/07 9:07 AM, Jack Davis, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it your feeling
LOL
J
--- Bob Shell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 11, 2007, at 10:06 AM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Ken? Your name sounds familiar - do I know you?
Shel
My old friend Paul Klingenstein used to say that one of the
advantages of getting old is that you meet new people every day.
Another tired game of number/info smoke and mirrors. Test points
randomly related to support a claim of comparing the performance of the
Nikon D80, EOS XTi, K10D, Samsung GX-10 and Sony Alpha 100.
Bottom line is the usual indirect mish-mash of implied choices strewn
though the ratings so as not to
Been many years, but as I recall, the 126 was more of a square format
although smaller than 35mm.
Could this be a 620?
Jack
--- mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
126 format, I believe. Came in a cassette, like 110. My first
camera, an Agfamatic given to me when I was about 8, used this.
May I in all humility point out that the DA* will be a 60~250?
Jack
--- Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Paul,
Paul Stenquist wrote:
Pentax now offers the DA 40-200 4/5.6. An excellent lens for the
money, although the build quality is so-so. The next lens you'll
see
that
I lied! (sorry) =)
Jack
--- William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Jack Davis
Subject: Re: quick report: A 70-210 F4 on *ist-Ds
May I in all humility point out that the DA* will be a 60~250?
No.
Humility is for wimps.
WW
--
PDML Pentax
Too cute!
(she probably thinks it's OK because she's seen grandpa on the floor
unconscious)?
Jack
--- Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When a girl needs a nap, a girl needs a nap. In a pinch, the kitchen
floor will do.
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5452813size=lg
Love an image which appears to reflect my vision of true-to-life color.
Very well done!
Jack
--- Rick Womer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The last apples of the season, at the local farmer's
market in mid-December.
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5458065
ist D, FA 16-45, ISO 200,
Lived in Iowa for about 25 years and these shots remind me of both the
beauty and hazards of ice storms.
These days, I would break my face (and camera) trying to navigate in
such conditions.
All shots well caught.
Jack
--- Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We had an ice storm in Michigan
Harald,
I didn't see the PUG, so I'll jump in here to say I'm impressed with
your eye and composition. Impressive shot.
Jack
--- Harald Rust [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tom,
Thanks for the kind words. Got lucky with the clouds
that evening. Can't wait for summer to return.
Harald
Tom C.
I've, also, been there and while I appreciate this BW rendition, in
this case, I tend to agree with Tom. A bit lacking in strength that
color might fix.
To me the face of the mountain ridge is too dark and featureless and
isn't redeemed by the sky.
I'm going to dig up a Jasper shot or two and may
Strong image exceedingly well done and nicely composed. As has been
said, red filter certainly a help along with the protected shadow
detail.
Jack
--- Brendan MacRae [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This one was taken heading toward the summit of Tioga
Pass (ele 9945ft) on the way toward Lee Vining
Welcome Mike,
Cotty forgot to warn you about me, but if you've been lurking for a
couple weeks, you've likely already learned to discount anything from
either Cotty or myself.
Jack
--- Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 18/1/07, Mike Dausin (PDML), discombobulated, unleashed:
Hello, I've
Do believe I'll wait for the real release by Pentax, but...
will the download/installation process be simply stated and clearly
explained. After downloading, I have the feeling that I'll not have the
slightest idea what to do to load it to my K10D? I do know where the
USB cord is but no idea as to
Thanks very much to both you a Bill for the help.
I've filed your emails.
Jack
--- Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 18, 2007, at 4:18 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
Do believe I'll wait for the real release by Pentax, but...
will the download/installation process be simply stated
Boris,
Light looks ideal to me.
If I knew you better I might be tempted to remark about the terrible
distortion produced by the lens...but perhaps I shouldn't. :-))
Congratulations on your anniversary!
Jack
--- Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello.
Yesterday three of us went to a
Apparently as intended, it is very soft. Can't make out fine detail so
must ask, are those water droplets on the beautiful subject?
I'm looking forward to installing the firmware soon.
Thanks for the peek.
Jack
--- J and K Messervy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since upgrading my K10D's firmware
Something I always un-check is the High Speed box found on the
Advanced printing panel. (R1800)
Didn't do so once and the results were disappointing.
This is free!!
Jack
--- Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've checked all the variables numerous times, and to the best of my
I completely agree. I've compared a number of images which were pro lab
scanned and LightJet printed to prints which had been previously pro
lab optically printed. In each case, the scanned image carried more
fine detail. Didn't always require a loupe to determine either.
Difference was great
This seems to be more of a scanner test.(?)
My experience has been the complete opposite. Obviously, personal
impressions, also, play a roll.
Jack
--- Patrick Genovese [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't care what sort of scanner it is, you are now making a
comparison of
a first generation
Lovely subject! I agree that it's slightly dark.
Nice lighting for a 24 year old on a date, but such beautiful clear
skin and features deserve a bit more light. IMHO
Be sure and file this one in a safe place. =)
Jack
--- Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/22/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi
Wonder-ful. Soft pensive catch. I gather the vertical background edges
are a part of the window frame, but in any case, I might try softening
them some.
Thanks for the look.
Jack
--- rg2 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is my son Peter, on his first airplane trip.
I was fairly sure I'd stumble some in attempting to implement this
firmware update, but I'm getting absolutely nowhere.
Running Windows XP.
I downloaded it to my desktop from the Pentax site, but can't retrieve
it. Don't know how many times I've seen the screen stating (in part)
Internet Explorer
Thanks William and Godders for your help. It's done!!
Jack
--- Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was fairly sure I'd stumble some in attempting to implement this
firmware update, but I'm getting absolutely nowhere.
Running Windows XP.
I downloaded it to my desktop from the Pentax site
:-))
J
--- William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: J and K Messervy Subject: Asked to do a wedding.
I have been asked whether I'd be interested in photographing the
wedding of
the brother of an acquaintance.
Any and all tips, tricks and advice
Light and unsaturated was my impression of prints done on the R1800
in High Speed mode. I realize that you're experiencing a change while
using your past settings, but this is short and won't take much of your
time to read. :)
I'm feeling your pain.
Jack
--- Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Having loaded the K10D firmware, I've been checking wireless flash
using the built in flash and an AF-360FGZ. Can only get it to work in
either A or M mode. No P-TTL?
BTW, I'm not picking up any pre-flash cross talk as I did (sold it)
with the MZ-S.(?)
Wonder if Pentax will be providing an Owner's
sure both camera and flash are set to the same
channel. Fn menu should be set to wireless and there's
also a custom setting for firing the built in flash as
master or controller.
Mine works fine in P-TTL in Av mode both in master and
controller settings.
-Brendan
--- Jack Davis [EMAIL
Put it up again in 2076, along with a price.
At my age, 1976 seems a recent year.
Jack
--- William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I found this in a condominium that I am helping renovate
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/nytimes/nytimes.html
Anyway, It's up for grabs, providing it is going to
I have to hit the light/format
button again.
Perhaps there's something similar on the 360?
-Brendan
--- Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks, Brendan.
Decided to check flash in Fn program and toggled
over to W setting.
Am now getting the pre-wink P-TTL flash. Still
seeing
button again.
Perhaps there's something similar on the 360?
-Brendan
--- Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks, Brendan.
Decided to check flash in Fn program and toggled
over to W setting.
Am now getting the pre-wink P-TTL flash. Still
seeing only A or M
as mode settings
Nice, Tom! A bit different shade of green on my monitor..of course.
Like your crop, also.
How do you protect you camera under such conditions?
Jack
--- Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Skiing last Saturday at Bogus Basin, it was snowy up top.
with the istD.
Dave
On 1/25/07, Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Having loaded the K10D firmware, I've been checking wireless flash
using the built in flash and an AF-360FGZ. Can only get it to work
in
either A or M mode. No P-TTL?
BTW, I'm not picking up any pre-flash cross talk as I did
:
Mine's working fine in P-TTL with 540 flash
- Original Message -
From: Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Friday, January 26, 2007 4:37 AM
Subject: P-TTL Wireless?
Having loaded the K10D firmware, I've been checking wireless flash
Yes, I know. I have the flash manual, but it was a K10D setting I had a
problem with.
FTR,I have an affinity for complicating things.
Jack
--- Mike Hamilton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/25/07, Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can now say the same with the 360. Takes concentration when
Access forbidden Error 403
Thanks, Godfrey, but I really don't believe I'll have further need for
it.
Jack
--- Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 25, 2007, at 3:17 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
I can now say the same with the 360. Takes concentration when
setting
it up
):
click on the underlined words CLICK HERE. That will download it to
your system.
The document details the changes that the FW update incorporates.
Godfrey
On Jan 25, 2007, at 4:45 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
Access forbidden Error 403
Thanks, Godfrey, but I really don't believe I'll
No, Tom, it simply overrides them with a different and more serious
problem; the YUCK factor. :-DDD
Jack
--- Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've found that Velvia solves most flash problems. :-
Tom C.
From: Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail
I like that very much! Who took it? rim shot
Jack
--- Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not bad for a Canon 5D. :-|
http://spaceweather.com/comets/mcnaught/22jan07/Daalder2.jpg
Tom C.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
.
From: Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I like that very much! Who took it? rim shot
Jack
--- Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not bad for a Canon 5D. :-|
http://spaceweather.com/comets/mcnaught/22jan07/Daalder2.jpg
Tom C.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
. ;-)
Tom C.
From: Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Comet McNaught - Canon 5D
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 09:52:40 -0800 (PST)
Well, OK. I, mistakenly, thought that anyone who would use Velvia,
would
I've seen what appear as sharply focus water drops on such lenses with
an in-focus background. Amazing!
Jack
--- Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A close focusing wide angle lens? If he's shooting 35mm movie film a
wide lens is something like an 8 to 12 mm. You get one heck of a lot
I don't know either. A DOF tool is a shift lens, and is simply
something that came to mind while reading your post.
I'll be following the thread myself.
Jack
--- Barry Rice [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey Folks,
A general photography question
I'm a big fan of David Attenborough
Yesterday I tried several times to upload a photo to the web and
failed. I asked my webmaster (guess that's what folks some call them)
if he would try it. He did and experienced the same problem. He somehow
learned that there have been a number of complaints about the new
Internet Explorer 7. I
PC etc... and still have friends.
/advocacy mode
Jack Davis a écrit :
Yesterday I tried several times to upload a photo to the web and
failed. I asked my webmaster (guess that's what folks some call
them)
if he would try it. He did and experienced the same problem. He
somehow
learned
Micah,
Frustrating, isn't it? I imagine it happens to all of us much more than
most will mention.
It is distractingly soft, at least for my taste. If that is your
intent, may I suggest you give the viewer a hint through a title or
comment. Nothing wrong with that expression form certainly, but it
to happen, so I gave up on the plan...
- MCC
Jack Davis wrote:
Yesterday I tried several times to upload a photo to the web and
failed. I asked my webmaster (guess that's what folks some call
them)
if he would try it. He did and experienced the same problem. He
somehow
learned
Internet Explorer is Windows, is it not? Version 7 apparently has some
embedded problems.
Jack
--- David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How do you upload photo's through IE?
I either use Windows Explorer or (mostly) Filezilla.
Cheers,
Dave
On 1/28/07, Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED
You're enjoying this aren't you, Godfrey? :-())
Jack
--- Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am so relieved that they stopped supporting IE for Mac OS X.
G
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
of money
(which it did) but because the tools it can create empowers me and
everyone else to a more creative life. Seeing people struggle with
garbage software is very sad.
G
On Jan 28, 2007, at 7:30 AM, Jack Davis wrote:
You're enjoying this aren't you, Godfrey? :-())
Jack
Marnie, I'm afraid you're standing on the banana peal of the damned.
Tech progress will forever create a perpetual Groundhog Day for the
newbie.
Jack
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 1/28/2007 8:28:53 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I agree with you,
Nicely composed and a somewhat provocative image. Due to lighting, and
DOF, the bench is being referenced as a point to consider by the
viewer. Insights curiosity.
Welcome and I get that attachment with my father.
Jack
--- Corey Leopold [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello everyone,
I'm new to the
list
Subject: Re: IE7 and photo uploading
On 28/1/07, Jack Davis, discombobulated, unleashed:
I'm afraid you're standing on the banana peal of the damned.
Mark!
agreed - but somebody slipped on the banana peel of English
orthography!
B
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
Godfrey, quit trying to spoil our fun! =)
Jack
--- Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 28, 2007, at 12:24 PM, Digital Image Studio wrote:
Marnie, I'm afraid you're standing on the banana peal of the
damned.
Tech progress will forever create a perpetual Groundhog Day
Very pleasing line of both steps and fence. Has an inviting quality.
The left foreground grass being out of focus does, however, inhibit its
total success and the fence post graffiti adds a dimension I don't care
for.
Jack
--- Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Taken recently in San
1 - 100 of 17613 matches
Mail list logo