Hi Marcello, in what sense the BW scans are not right?
I use the Minolta Scan Speed with the software that came with it.
I always thought my scans were okay.
Jos
Dear William,
Like others pointed out, your problem has, most probably, to do with the
fact that the shutter speed must be slow enough to have the way to the
negative completely free at the moment the flash appears.
You can test this as follows:
take a picture without film, with the flash on, in a
Hi Lasse,
I have the scan speed.
I bought it about a year ago from a shop nearby, upgrading to Nikon (same
story as you!).
I was told (and I believe) it was not used for more than 50 films. So in
fact it was brand new and I got full garantee.
I use it with the original software. This software is
Hi Mark,
How are you sure they are your manuals? Did you Mark them in a way? Some
of the manuals I bought in a normal shop, I could scan and sell, I guess?
Anyhow I'm glad with your service on your web!
Your scan quality is so much better than the poor quality of a
professional(?) company like
Indeed you gain flexibility, decide later if it has to be B+W or colour. And
also the kind of filtering: if you take a colour shot with the intention to
get finally B+W, you decide on the filtering in the digital darkroom. This
will work for most filters except ofcourse for pola filters and
Your right Herb, and I'm quite sure that in future digital camaras will have
a switch to select infra red modes I hope that it will show the
beautifull combination of infra red sensitivity plus grain and the halos as
is given now by the Kodak infra red film.
Greetings, Jos
-Oorspronkelijk
Dear group,
Last year I had a question to the list about assembling a SMC-A 50/1.7.
I received a lot of good replies and even pictures showing the assembling.
Due to a computer crash last year I have lost the mails in my personal
archive.
I didnot worry to much because I thought to find every
,
the young soldiers leaving america at the beginning of that war showed the
same enthousiasme as the boys I see now on television..
Regards, Jos from Holland
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Namens Gary L. Murphy
Verzonden: zondag 30 september 2001 16:44
Aan: Pentax Users Group
Onderwerp: SMC F 70-210
What would be a good price for the above lens in excellent shape
I recently paid 80 EURO in Holland.
circuit to extract two trigger pulses
from the Z-1 pulse: one corresponding with the first curtain and one
corresponding with the second curtain. In this way I could have contrast
control with two automatic flashguns, controlling their light output
independently (without TTL).
Jos from Holland.
Len
that this is not nice, the work around is to isolate this contact.
It will be the same contact on your camera.(See Boz side to know wich
contact it is)
If you try this I am interested to hear from you if the TTL in your camera
still functions with this contact isolated.
-
Hope this helps,
Jos from Holland
I would say the manufacturer can program such information about the
geometric distortion into the lens, so it would be transferred to the
camera
while using it, just like we have now with other lens data.
Frits Wüthrich from the UK at the moment.
Good point, Frits, but an (additional)adjustment
Tom wrote:
I was under the impression the rays just bounced off the plane at the
angle they came in at (angle of incidence?). The bounce doesn't spread
them out any more, though I guess a stucco style ceiling might do a
little of that.
The light *is* more spread out because it's traveling
. the same for very cloudy
days.
I hope this is of help to you.
Best regards, Jos from Holland
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Dear group,
About one year ago a disassemble my smc-A 50/1.7 because the diafragma ring
moved a bit stiff.
Now I want to assemble the lens again, but I donot remember how to put it
together again:-(
I always thought I was quite handy, but now my self confedence got a
crack...
Please advice :-)
to
photographe small children or small animals moving around in the room.
Before you know they are too close and out of focus. In these cases 1.1 or
1.2m is much more convinient.
Greetings, Jos from Holland
(Jos bought his first Pentax in the seventies. Now uses MX, ME-super and Z-1
and recently a Minolta
aperture.
I got the lens together with a ROWI gun type of shoulder fix that is fully
adjustable for convinient shooting.
I hope there is somebody in the list who can tell mesomething more about the
manufacturer.
Greetings, Jos from Holland
Bill wrote
set the aperture/shutter speed yourself. f11@1/125th
(or f16@1/60th, or f8@1/250th, etc) These take use of a
#25 red filter into account - so your main concern will
be framing up images that will hopefully have strong
IR reflectance and such.
There is one offered at www.marktplaats.nl in nieuw condition for only 275
Euro!
Greetings, Jos from Holland
(Jos bought his first Pentax in the seventies. Now uses MX, ME-super and Z-1
and recently went digital with a Minolta Scan Speed)
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Reading discussions on those goldplated LXs.
I just wondered.
If you take a black MX, take off the paint on the top and bottom part,
polish the copper real shiny,
put a nice yelow leather in the middle wouldend it look nice?.
Did somebody try this?
Greetings, Jos from Holland
(Jos
No, the construction is poor. Mine is already broken, I use a piece of tape
to close it. I am still thinking if I could fix it with a better
construction
Greetings, Jos.
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Namens £ukasz Kacperczyk
Verzonden:
not try the lens yet.Some
pictures?
Greetings, Jos from Holland
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
In fact, I am not sure it is a fish eye type. The person is not selling it
like that. he does not know much about lenses., but in a test in a magazin I
saw about SMC-F 17-28/ 3.5-4.5 being a fish eye. maybe there is also a
rectangular version?
Jos from Holland.
-Oorspronkelijk bericht
Dear Boris.
When doing macro, sometimes the camera changes focus in the wrong way.
If I dont want that, I auto focus till focus is okay, than I press AF
and than I shoot.
Boris Liberman wrote:
Har!
On Dec 24, 2007 3:41 PM, Sylwester Pietrzyk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Boris,
this
The Pentax Flashgrip has a switch called slow sync, it disables the
forced sync speed.
Greetz Jos
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Most Canon flash units are pretty much limited to working with the
Canon bodies. You might consider a Metz flash unit with an
interchangeable dedicated module that
Interesting thread!
A few things I like to contribute:
* No machine can fully compete with the AWB in our brains. A person
sitting under a green sunshade might get a greenish skin colour,
our brain knows about this effect and corrects for it. The
greenish skin colour might
One lens only? I would take the widest I have: the 18-55 kitlens, I can
always crop later but never expend! Missing an opportunity is much
worse for me than not having the best optical quality
Greetz, Jos
Steve Desjardins wrote:
To Serve and Diffract.
Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Right! That's the way I do it with simple K-Bayonet lenses. Works
perfectly for me (K10D and DS)
Jos
J. C. O'Connell wrote:
THIS IS ALL MOOT, I HAVE FOUND WITH K AND M LENSES TO JUST
ESTIMATE EXPOSURE BASED ON YEARS OF EXPERIENCE OR USE GREEN BUTTON
AND THEN
TWEEK FSTOP OR SHUTTER SPEED
Further to what was said:
The two flasguns were triggered at a different moment in time, one at
the leading edge of the sync pulse and the second at the trailing edge
(this is in fact rear curtain sync)
In this way the light output of each gun could be measured and
controlled independently.
Scott, when is the gate closing?
I'm still trying to improve my workflow to create a digital negative of
my Tmax negative using K10D with SMC-M 50/1.7 and bellows and Pentax
slide copier
If gate closes very soon I will have to send what I've got till now.
Greetz, Jos
Scott Loveless wrote:
Thx for the extra time.
I will send it in this evening.
Depending on where you are on the globe: maybe you still can close this
evening (your evening ) :-)
Greetz , Jos
Scott Loveless wrote:
Jos from Holland wrote:
Scott, when is the gate closing?
I'm still trying to improve my workflow
Dear Group,
I have lot of film material (negatives and slides) that I want to
convert to digital.
I have a good Minolta film scanner, at that time I paid more for it than
a K20D costs :-). It delivers good quality but it takes far to much time
to be used on larger quantities of
in my set up and click, I could even
make a footswitch to do it faster :-)
Jos
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Jun 26, 2008, at 10:02 AM, Jos from Holland wrote:
... This worked for me. Suggestions for quality or speed
improvements are
most welcome ...
I used to scan a lot of film
. That being said, a high quality film
scanner will undoubtedly do a better job, and I doubt that you'd spend any
more time at it. The setup here has to be quite time consuming.
-- Original message --
From: Jos from Holland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dear Group
On top:
if lens resolution (number of line per mm) is in same order of magnitude
as the number of pixels / mm on the sensor. The lens has the huge
advantage the the lines can be at any place even diagonally, but the
pixels have discrete position making the pixels/mm much less effective,
this
combination. i.e. using a shorter lens and cropping a 14mP sensor image
wont be as good as using a longer lens and NOT cropping a 10mP sensor
image.
JC OCONNELL
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jos
from Holland
Sent
For sensor it makes no difference if you have high iso setting with low
light and aperture wide open or bright sun with small aperture.
Both cases sensor receives little light and noise contriutes significantly
Amplification does not improve signal to noise ratio, because both are
amplified
Nobody reacted on this one.
This should be checked in the sensor spec. Is that available?
I would not be surprised if certain sensors can be set in a mode for
higher sensitivity, sacrificing on other characteristics.
Jos
Toralf Lund wrote:
since the sensor itself has a fixed sensitivity.
Thanks Mark and others,
I knew it was a good shot, that's why I went through the trouble of
digging through old negatives and the hastle of copying.
I feel flattered by your words!
Its a great pug, many contributions covering the subject
Jos
Mark Roberts wrote:
Scott Loveless wrote:
It's
Very moving, I recognice the feelings,
The idea behind the display presentation works very nice for me.
Display in my windows explorer is not perfect, but also not blocking the
experience
My dad and I are in a similar situation, I take pictures now and then
nicely sharp.
This guy's
Right, I have the same experience.
I noticed that I press the button till the camera reacts with focussing
etcetera and not so much till I feel the presure point.
Maybe the presure point is just redundant in modern DSLRs?
Jos
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
The shutter release on my K10D similarly has
I think it is just a trick to simplify lens design?
My very first box camera (Agfa Click or maybe it was Clack) had the
6x9cm film positioned in a curved way.
Greetz, Jos
Bob W wrote:
This is quite interesting:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/7543987.stm
It's about a means of putting
My suggestions:
Detail
self-portrait
Cheese!
Animal
Bird
Technical
Marriage
Birth
Funeral
Dark
Light
Smile
Death
Macro
Hand (for the nudity guys)
Foot (again for the nudity guys)
Greetz, Jos
Scott Loveless wrote:
Hey, gang. Since Bill got the ball rolling on this we can all blame him.
I
Give self portrait a second thought.
Many painters make self portraits not only because of lack of money to
pay a model...
For me:
Taking a picture gives a kick
It gives a kick to be subject in a photograph
Looking at a picture you took gives a kick
Looking to a picture with you as the subject
Dear group,
I have a broken ME super and a broken Program-A, bothh with good screen.
And a good MX with damaged screen.
Can I swap screens? do they have the same dimensions???
Greetz, Jos
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to
Visiting Singapore a few weeks ago, I thought it a nice opperunity to buy a
TTL flash for my *istDS.
Some internet reviews made me think the Sigma EF500 DG super could be a nice
possibility.
In the shops, they had Sigma for Cannon, Sigma for Nikon, but Pentax: no
sir, Pentax?.
I held the
or Sigma EF-500 DG
super
Jos from Holland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Visiting Singapore a few weeks ago, I thought it a nice
opperunity to buy a
TTL flash for my *istDS.
Some internet reviews made me think the Sigma EF500 DG super
could be a nice
possibility.
In the shops, they had Sigma
fill flash.
Very handy.
Don
-Original Message-
From: Jos from Holland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, June 19, 2005 12:46 PM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: RE: Flashgun for *istDS: Pentax 500FTZ or Sigma EF-500 DG super
High speed sync, in which situation can
Conclusion sofar:
It seems that the Sigma is not wireless controlled by the DS, an important
plus over the 500FTZ is gone.
It seems that high speed sync works, but no one indicated that the flash
/available light ratio improved at higher than real sync speed, and that
is what I want to have
500FTZ or Sigma EF-500 DG
super
Jos from Holland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry Mark, I know you work with this flash and are happy with
it, that was
one of the reasons I've put this flash on my list.
I did and do not want to offend people that have this flash.
It's not a matter
I feel the same.:-(
I am afraid that the DS does not have the hard ware to communicate wireless
with a flash.
Cannot be solved with SW.
Maybe hardware add-on exists, maybe Metz?
Jos
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Joaquim Carvalho [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thibouille wrote:
Yes
Yes, that is what Pentax proposes in the manual, but I think it a bit crazy
to buy a second flash just for the use as transmitter/receiver. It makes the
camera also unnecessairy bulky.
I would rather look for a wireless off-camera flash connection. Just a
connection cable without the cable part!
I work in a simular way, but that is more in studio condition. Than the TTL
is not important. Certainly not important now being digital. I can see what
I get immediately. Think I can sell my flashmeter as well. The histogram
function of the DS is better than a sophisticated flashmeter.
The IR
I have no doubts when a flash magnifier is used: with the light concentrated
in a small area as needed for 500mm lens , the guide number of the flash
goes up sharply, combined with the fact that the frog is at short distance
(4 meters in this case)means the flash can over power the available light
Hi Pal,
I'm Dutch, but about Yachts I only know that it is jacht in Dutch:-)
Jos
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Pål Jensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Verzonden: Wednesday, July 20, 2005 6:06 PM
Aan: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Onderwerp: Any dutch list members?
A shot in the
The main thing is that the body must measure the light of the two flashes
independently.
Therefor one flash is fired and controled at the beginning of the time the
shutter is open (first curtain sync) and the second flash is fired and
controlled at the end of the open shutter time (second curtain
.
greetings, Jos
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Matt Bevers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Verzonden: Monday, July 21, 2003 3:30 PM
Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Onderwerp: Re: flash needed
On Monday, July 21, 2003, at 06:24 AM, Jos from Holland wrote:
Buy Swivel head that goes around (almost 360
John Graves wrote:
I am still using PSE3. I am limited to adobe Camera Raw 3.6 (which I
have installed)by PSE3. I have not seen any picture processing tools
in any of the subsequent PSE or Camera Raw releases that warrant their
purchase. It appears that the subsequent Camera Raw releases
Bran Everseeking wrote:
what are the benefits and drawbacks of pef vs dng?
Every camera brand and often every camera model has its own type of RAW
-- 20 years from now all software can open DNG but probably not all
RAW, certainly not of brands that existed in the past..)
Greetz, Jos
--
Hi Fernando,
Don't you need then SW that understands PEF (of the specific camera)???'
Fernando wrote:
You can convert PEF to DNG after the fact, if that ever happens.
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 3:23 PM, Jos from Holland
jos_from_holl...@onsnet.nu wrote:
Bran Everseeking wrote:
what
from Holland
jos_from_holl...@onsnet.nu wrote:
Hi Fernando,
Don't you need then SW that understands PEF (of the specific camera)???'
Fernando wrote:
You can convert PEF to DNG after the fact, if that ever happens.
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 3:23 PM, Jos from Holland
jos_from_holl...@onsnet.nu
Nick,
If you download the free SmartCurve you get what you want.
It integrates in PSE under the filter tab. For me it doubles the value
of PSE. By changing the curve you can adapt contrast, gamma, local gamma
etcetera.
I even use it for pseudo-solarisation effects and to make positives of
my
Exactly! Thats why people with poor eyesight are lucky: they have a
larger COC and get more DOF for free!
Matthew Hunt wrote:
And that's what determines depth of field: The appearance of
sharpness. Every derivation of DOF begins with that criterion.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
hifis...@gate.net
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
Derby Chang
Sent: Wednesday, April 08, 2009 5:43 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Trading resolution for depth of field
Jos from Holland wrote:
Exactly! Thats why
Wrong argument Godfrey, with such low lighting ratios, the contrast of
the scene is dominantly determined by the white to black ratio of the
subject, this will be a lot higher otherwise it would result in a very
dull picture, it can be higher than even the human eye can cover.
Did I
Beautifull photos..Thx for posting
And I donot care at all if they are real wildlife or tame models. :-)
Some of the eyes show a nice spark of light, I guess the on camera flash?
Greetz, Jos
Bob W wrote:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/8487031.stm
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
Sorry Larry, but no autofocus system will be able to guess by itself
which part of the scene you want in focus.
One day you want the singer in focus, next day you want the mike in focus.
Future sytems, but not in the near future, will do this by reading your
mind.
Till than its better to use
it might be viable but I doubt anyone will pay the
premium beyond the rudimentary version that they had - which
incidentally worked so well i never caught onto why they dropped it
cheers
ecke
2010/2/17 Jos from Holland jos_from_holl...@onsnet.nu:
Sorry Larry, but no autofocus system will be able
never tried. I believe the ME
and MX have similar sized screens, (the ME just doesn't have the
handling tab), so it might fit in the screen frame in the MX. I haven't
a clue about the Program A.
Jos from Holland wrote:
Dear group,
I have a broken ME super and a broken Program
Yes, but
only sharper at the point of focus..
The system with smaller sensor will show a larger depth of focus...
The depth of focus is best compromised for my photography at a size
somewhere in between APS-C and FF (24x36)
Greetz Jos
JC OConnell wrote:
At a given Mpixel sensor, FF
Last sunday at Leonard Cohen concert in Oberhausen (I enjoyed it very,
very much).
As always: taking pictures not allowed.
There was a risk that I had to hand-over my camera at the entrance (as
happend to me at Pinkpop concerts) so I decided not to take my K10D, but
only my DL and a suitable,
Charles, which camera did you use? Was it normal ? :-)
Jos
Charles Robinson wrote:
On Nov 6, 2008, at 12:55, Jos from Holland wrote:
I was not allowed to take any more pictures, because that was not a
normal camera.
In other words: That looks like a camera which could conceivably take
the only 'normal' camera I would let pass.
Regards, Bob S.
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 12:55 PM, Jos from Holland
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Last sunday at Leonard Cohen concert in Oberhausen (I enjoyed it very, very
much).
As always: taking pictures not allowed.
There was a risk that I had to hand-over
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jos from Holland
Sent: 06 November 2008 18:56
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Leonard Cohen concert, how to make my camera look normal?
Last sunday at Leonard Cohen concert in Oberhausen (I enjoyed
it very, very much).
As always: taking pictures
Ai, I did not think of that possibility, I have a 110 and a 70mm with it!
From the other hand, 400 ASA was not enough w/o shake reduction.
And I never liked 400ASA on 35mm. On 110 400ASA could look like kingsize
confetti!
But using the camera would have been fun!
Jos
John Sessoms wrote:
I've
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jos from Holland
Sent: 07 November 2008 17:53
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Leonard Cohen concert, how to make my camera look normal?
Yes, he is great. One of my sons liked it so much, he went to
four concerts within a few weeks, different
Thanks Scott, for the work done!
All are nice, but the four that work best for me are:
-- The little bird by David Brooks
-- Red Umbrella by Jaume Lahuerta
-- Høst (= Autumn I guess?) by Toralf
-- Lake Mathieson and Fox Glacier by Peter McIntosh
Thanks all for posting!
Greetz Jos
What about depency of eyesight quality?
People with reduced eyesight will always enjoy deeper depth of field? :-)
Maybe we just have to accept that there is only one subject to lens
distance sharp and we are lucky we can choose that point ourselfs (or
leave it to the camera)
Greetz, Jos
Nice one to make your goldplated MX: take the caps off, remove the
remaining paint and give to one of those companies for a thin (or thick
if you are rich) gold layer.
Greetz, Jos
Chris Mitchell wrote:
These were once highly prized over the silver ones as I recall (scroll down
to see the
Hi John,
I think it could be done in _software_ to make it work for any flash,
but it would require a bit complicated menu to give the camera the
required information about P-TLL or center contact only or expected
burn time.
In the Z-1 time I measured burntime of several flashes at hand, they
Last sentence should be read as: I donot know if my K20 has the same
info in the _flash trigger pulse_.
Jos from Holland wrote:
Hi John,
I think it could be done in _software_ to make it work for any flash,
but it would require a bit complicated menu to give the camera the
required
John, maybe it tells the flash digitally through the communication line
that it has to use the trailling edge of the triggerpuls of the camera
for triggering the flash (that would be the same principle as on the Z-1)
If it works like that, your adapter board will be very simple :-)
Greetz,
Dear group,
How was it to see the number of clicks a K10d had during its life?
Thx Jos
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
Dear Group,
BOZ's website mentions three data backs for the MZ / ZX camera's: FG, FI
and FJ
Does anyone know the difference?
I have one on a MZ-50, it has no type marking, but it seems to fit
without problems on a MZ-5 and the pictures on BOZ's site all look the
same to me.
Also I cannot see
will work on the MZ-6 as well.
Dario
- Original Message - From: Jos from Holland
jos_from_holl...@onsnet.nu
To: Pentax-Discuss List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 8:40 PM
Subject: What is difference between Data back FG, FI and FJ??
Dear Group,
BOZ's website mentions three
Indeed the true way to compare flash light output is the amount of
energy in the flash of light.
This is independend of the way the light is directed, bundeled or difused.
The basic principle of this kind of flash guns is:
1. The voltage of the battery is boosted to a high voltage on a
Nice picture!
Painters in the old days solved your problem by making self-portraits.
I can recommend that.
Greetz, Jos
William Robb wrote:
I've had it.
Too high maintenance.
Too frustrating.
Too much drama.
This past year has been incredibly frustrating for me. I had wanted to
hone some of my
I used to work that way.
I always thought that in case of the RAW I was looking to a picture
converted to Jpeg by Picase. There was a clear difference in the two
pictures, but I do not remember which one was best.
Nowedays I shoot in raw, save the out of camera raw on a external disk,
work
Thank you, Cotty,
When I discovered that I had the wrong theme, somebody on the list suggested
that also dry Martini is not that dry!
Jos
Intriguing
by Jos van der Hijden
I like the contrast between the water and the metalwork, the way it
slices through the water and the light on it.
and many days for many Palestinians.
Jos
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Godfrey
DiGiorgi
Verzonden: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 4:35 PM
Aan: PDML
Onderwerp: Re: Seriously Off Topic: War is starting in Israel
Why do you admonish Boris
unfortunately he is right
Jos
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Verzonden: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 6:14 PM
Aan: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Onderwerp: Re:Seriously Off Topic: War is starting in Israel
Ignore this
Thanks to all, so far,
I us e Photoshop7 for serious work, but this one cannot use RAW plugin.
I will try Irfanview, but I fear that user interfacing will not compare
to Rawshooter.
Maybe I want too much: I want a mixed file handler, with the user
interface of RAWSHOOTER and for free (or
You're right, Patrick, I downloaded the latest Picasa, it can handle the
mixed files.
I used it on the 150 mixed files I had in my camera
I found it quick and easy to do picture selection.
I did cropping and shadow and high light correction, good enough to have
a slide show for demo to friends
hihi, maybe that will depend on how the cutter thinks about Pentax
Jos
frank theriault wrote:
On 1/22/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
So if you watch the DISCOVERY program on the 101 building of Taipei: the
guy with the DS is me!
Cool! I'll watch for it -
I think that is the final direction it will go if technology allows:
using the sensor itself for the viewfinding.
It still has some problems, but the advantages would be great like:
Get rid of mechanical things like moving mirrors
Easier to keep dust away from sensor
Swivable display allows
No! No!
Do _not_ measure with a cheap volt meter!
Many cheap voltmeters are not very high ohmic.
As a result it will load the trigger voltage point of the flash,
reducing the measured voltage.
This is specifically true for the flashes with high voltage, they mostly
have a high impedance input
Dear group,
I aquired the Sigma 8-16mm lens for use on my K5.
I noticed that the camera does not show any lens name in the metadata
info in Lightroom (version 4.4) and the focal length is only mentioned
down to 10 mm, 9 and 8 is blank.
Camera SW version is 1.14, (the latest)
Is this a camera
to show the correct focal length, but who know
when that will be, it's been an issue for a couple of years.
Lightroom will probably correct itself on the next point release (if
there is one before LR5 is released).
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 6:39 AM, Jos from Holland
jos_from_holl...@onsnet.nu wrote
: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Jos from Holland
Sent: Friday, June 7, 2013 6:39 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Pentax K5 does not recognize Sigma 8-16 lens
Dear group,
I aquired the Sigma 8-16mm lens for use on my K5.
I noticed that the camera does not show any lens
I have very much the same feeling as Zos,
I have the Metz 58AF-2 and prefer it over the Pentax 540, that I owned once.
I prefer it because of the last status memory after switch off and
because it can operate in auto mode with sensor on the flash, this mode
works very well in situations we
1 - 100 of 142 matches
Mail list logo
