Pat White wrote:
Have you checked the prices at Costco? They have 2-packs of certain ink
cartridges for a little less.
Pat White
Pat - I bet,
however those who live in the middle of Manhattan (before you guys think Im
rich,
I'm under rent control) consider Costco some odd store in the
for the info Ken, I'll check it
out..
ann
- Original Message -
From: Ann Sanfedele [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2002 4:52 AM
Subject: EPson ink usage for color prints
Boy, the matte heavyweight paper gobbles up ink fast -
Is there any evidence
Paul Stenquist wrote:
Good paper is expensive. In fact, the best paper (for many subjects)
produces wonderful results, is quite expensive, and sucks up the ink as
well :-). It's Ilford Fine Art Paper. It's a textured watercolor-type
paper with a wonderful feel and look, and it prints
Keith Whaley wrote:
Aha! That explains what some have said about how to get around that
little 'feature.' To squeeze a few more pages out of the cartridge.
Thanks!
Another aspect of not totally emptying the cartridge is, if you have
empty feed lines, the ink in them can (and will
Pat White wrote:
Ann, the picture is on page 72, in the Glamour and Beauty section. Thanks
for asking, and let me know what you think.
Pat White
Will do, Pat! Hope to check it out tomorrow.
ann
Mark D. wrote:
--- Pat White [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Have you checked the prices at Costco? They have
2-packs of certain ink
cartridges for a little less.
For the Epson 820, Costco sells a 3 pack with 2 color
cartridges and and one black cartridge. It's
approximately $50.
Mark
woo
Paul Stenquist wrote:
I read an article in the New York Times about a Costco going up on the
lower east side.
Yikes... that's a bit of good news/bad news...
doubt if the prices would be as good
here though.
ann
Ann Sanfedele wrote:
Pat White wrote:
Have you checked the prices
Herb Chong wrote:
Message text written by INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sorry, Herb - I disagree about beauty, too f8 and be there is fine,
but
people have made beautiful photographs of less than beautiful places and
things.
i've never disagreed with that. what i have disagreed with is
http://users.rcn.com/annsan/
my home page and follow link to America Naturally Calendar?
One of the Scrabble guys has 8 points on guesses of where things are -
I'm keeping the contest open until Christmas eve -
Ya gotta beat this guy ! :)
rules:
read across and then down for numbers 1-12
2
Joseph Tainter wrote:
This is the PUG with the theme Cliché. In my opinion, it is one of
Bill's most brilliant ideas.
I suggest that we set up a vote for the best cliché photo that month.
(And I'm suggesting it for that month only, unless we want to make it an
annual.)
Unless folks find
get... or how about grandma with a toddler
grandchild?
They don't have to be poorly shot pictures to be a cliche - but they probably
should
have a Norman Rockwell look to them :)
Ciao,
Graywolf
http://pages.prodigy.net/graywolfphoto
- Original Message -
From: Ann Sanfedele [EMAIL
Mike Johnston wrote:
quoting someone else
If Pentax...would
have applied advances in autofocus, image
stabilization...how many of you would
be still shooting with Pentax (a majority brand)? Or
would you be shooting Canon FD and poking jealous fun
at Pentax snobs G?
Then MIke J
Glen O'Neal wrote:
Perhaps an interesting twist on the Cliché theme. Imagine producing an image
that illustrates a common cliché. For instance:
A fork in the road
You can pick any cliché and illustrate it in visual and literal terms.
Here's another:
Put up your Dukes
Several pictures of
-
From: Ann Sanfedele [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 12:35 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: April 2003 PUG and conrect attri
Although quoted in reply to Treena... annsan wrote the puppies and
children
thing...
It kinda looked in your quote
Wend - it is late and I'm lazy about snipping --
I'm glad I was some inspiration that ultimately turned out good :)
I'm selling a few of mine at $25.00, which , after I got Staples to
go down to the price I paid through altex for paper and cartridges,
gives me about a $10.00 profit... of
Lon Williamson wrote:
Maybe more to the point: Printing BW scans using a Black-only cart
yields, in my hands, dismal results. I actually print such scans using
color carts. More tonality. It also helps a bunch to scan at more than
an 8-bit setting for BW (using my stuff, anyway).
-Lon
see above -
annsan
Boris Liberman wrote:
Hi!
Yesterday I saw KX and was amazed by rather dim screen. Pardon my age
and hence lack of knowledge, but what is the reason for putting the
rather dark circle around the microprism center of the screen?
JUst to annoy people ;) You can change the focusing screen -
Paul Stenquist wrote:
Okay guys, I'm gonna break the rules and point out an ebay auction. But
this one is special, very special. It's a Mamiya Pentax camera :-). Hey,
I started with one of these. Everyone should have one.
Paul
Paul, so did I - it was my ex husband's back in 1966 - mama mia!
tom wrote:
My first magazine ad is in Modern Bride Washington and is hitting
newstands now:
http://www.bigdayphoto.com/mbad.jpg
A better view:
http://www.bigdayphoto.com/mbad.gif
Rejected:
http://www.bigdayphoto.com/mb-ad.gif
Woo Hoo! I'm excited.
tv
Your accepted ad looks terrific,
gfen wrote:
FWIW:
I've seen (well, read) about using a polarizer on your lens and a
polarizer on your lights to cross polarize the lighting.. Supposedly this
takes care of any glare..
I, however, have no clue beyond that.
--
annsan writes:
I read this as well, but never got around to
Paul Stenquist wrote:
Thanks Keith,
I'm back up now, perhaps it was a caching problem or something. Who
knows what gremlins lurk in the internet.
Um sort of a case of cache me if you can ???
annsan ducks...
.
May:
Gulf Light
by Ann Sanfedele,
http://pug.komkon.org/02may/annmaypg.html
annsan replies --
I'm honored, Flavio...
I have a shot on my real calendar taken about 30
minutes later :) but I used it for
July.
I spent many hours selecting, scanning, printing
the calendar of my work
I'm selling, I
Paul Franklin Stregevsky wrote:
I've read that we see at f/5.6. Has anyone ever heard of photographers who
will shoot only at f/5.6 because they want to be truthful?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
f8 and be there for me, most of the time.
When I want a blurred background, it is usually when I I'm
Gary L. Murphy wrote:
On Tue, 31 Dec 2002 20:50:15 -0500, Altaf Shaikh wrote:
What is a PUG?
A type of dog
Sorry, couldn't resist :-)
Later,
Gary
I'm tempted to tease you about ducks and geese Gary but
:)
I have to say I almost wrote the same thing...
annpunfedele
Mike Johnston wrote:
quoting Mark (Roberts? yes?)
More rules to follow and to deliberately break:
http://website.lineone.net/~peter.saw/ctutor/cmpsitn.htm
Mark,
Much as I respect you and like your work, I think we'll just have to agree
to disagree (which, by the bye, I really don't mind
Joseph Tainter wrote:
Cliché may have been Wheatfield Willie's finest moment (in re: PUG
themes, anyway). Digital may have been his worst. It's essentially an
extra open month.
Joe
Nah - pretty challenging I'd say. Um - are you giving Wheatfield
the finger?
(but remember, use your
CBWaters wrote:
Wait to shoot her for a couple more years. The desire to shoot them gets
much much greater.
Kidding, of course. And mine are just 34 so the desire hasn't matured to
the teenage level yet ;)
I saw that header and was afraid we had gotten back to the gun discussiong
Also,
T Rittenhouse wrote:
Post feedback on the guy pointing out that he got them from your website
where they are fee downloads. Anyone who wants to see if he is an honest
dealer will get the message, and others deserve to get ripped anyway.
Ciao,
Graywolf
http://pages.prodigy.net/graywolfphoto
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark,
I would make sure ebay knows he is selling your material, violating your rights.
The other thing I have seen done is making another eBay listing.
Use an identical title, identical wording, and a $0.01 price.
Then ask the bidders not to bid, but to just go to
Keith Whaley wrote:
Paul Stenquist wrote:
The PhotoShop tutorials are quite adequate. You just have to see them
through from start to finish.
Paul
All facetiousness aside, I do believe you.
My single objection to PhotoShop is it's massiveness complexity,
similar to latest versions
Shaun Canning wrote:
What HTML editors or web page creation software are PDMLer's using for
their web sites? I am still using Frontpage 2000, which does the job,
but is an idiosyncratic little bugger...
I just write straight code and crib a lot from previously written stuff -
occasionally
tom wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Cesar Matamoros II [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Having worked out of the Baltimore area for a while, I was aware of
scrapple. Yet, I have never tried it. Maybe it is time to
correct that.
I may have to take a business trip that way the
tom wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Arachnophilia -- http://www.arachnoid.com/arachnophilia/
Freeware which the author has been supporting/updating for years.
This is what I use, though I like the older version more than the new
tom wrote:
I could have sworn someone posted a link to a lab (besides Ofoto) that
will take a scan and print it on a greeting card, but I can't find the
link.
Any suggestions?
Thanks.
tv
Yep - order cards from CAPE CADS - 1-800-848-7671 (maybe by now they have
a web address)
they are a
tom wrote:
I could have sworn someone posted a link to a lab (besides Ofoto) that
will take a scan and print it on a greeting card, but I can't find the
link.
Any suggestions?
Thanks.
tv
Tom - here is the link to the one I was talking about -
http://www.capecads.com/
ann
adphoto wrote:
Let's imagine for a moment that Microsoft buys out C and N and made
cameras
(snip, snip)
Didn't need to read any more than that to gasp in horror :) But I'm glad I did
-
I've hardly read any mail for a few days cause im down with a nasty cold in the
frigid NYC area and
T Rittenhouse wrote:
Think of a pirate laughing Har, har, har It has become a PDML term that
means. I am pulling your leg. When I came on the list Weathfield Willie
(Bill Robb) was using it a lot, but he says he picked it up from another
list member.
Ciao,
Graywolf
Paul Franklin Stregevsky wrote:
Har is Hebrew for mountain.
In English, it means, basically, Ha! or Ha-ha! The long version is
hardee-har-har! I have no idea why, any more than Spock could understand
why humans say to babies, Kootchie-kootchie-koo!
AH! hardee-har-har is something Jackie
Mike Johnston wrote:
My pet peeve is people who use the phrase begs the question when
they don't know what it means (they think it means raises the
question).
A couple of pet peeves:
one of the only (it's either the only or one of the few)
(snp)
Anybody got any other favorites?
Peter Alling wrote:
I always prefer As if I cared, it's short and to the point.
Regardsing caring - I just remembered a gaff a friend told me about.
Someone in the business of,
I believe, loan brokering, had this line on imprinted on the bottom of their
stationery: Tell someone who cares.
I have a Minolta auto winder. I have no minolta.
the serial number is 2164651. Japan. It comes
with a case
and I see no noticeable dings but have no way of
checking it out for sure.
I'll be happy to send it to someone who could use
such a thing for whatever you think it is worth,
rather than
Boris Liberman wrote:
Here's a story. Well, we did drive to Beer Sheva last weekend. Among
other things I've taken my FA 50/1.7 with me to shoot some kids. So
I've been shooting. One moment I've noticed kids were giving a certain
dog something to drink. Hopefully the shot I managed would
Doug Franklin wrote:
On Sat, 25 Jan 2003 11:48:17 -0600, Mike Johnston wrote:
with half the internet DDoS'ed with Microsofts SQL server
What in the world does this mean?
Apparently a worm or virus out on the Internet went active last night.
It is carrying out a Distributed Denial of
Boris Liberman wrote:
Hi!
Something unusual happened to my latest submission to PhotoSIG. During
two days more than 150 people saw the picture (which is a lot to my
level) but only one of them said a word.
Here is the link:
http://www.photosig.com/viewphoto.php?id=660866
I'd like to
Dan Scott wrote:
On Wednesday, January 29, 2003, at 11:16 PM, Peter Alling wrote:
Forced?
'e's well known as a horribly incorrigible bully. Just as likely to
give you a wedgie up to your ears as the time o'day. I wouldn't mess
with 'im.
Dan Scott
Yeah I still have fingernail marks
frank theriault wrote:
Hi, Ann,
Thanks for mentioning the distraction of the image overlapping the text - I'd
meant to mention that, as it does the same for me, but I forgot.
I've only gone to PhotoSIG a few times, and it's done that every time for me.
I use Netscrape, FWIW. It really
Otis Wright, Jr. wrote:
Ditto. Communicator 4.79 and it is beginning to have trouble with a lot of sites
where Explorer works OK. I'm putting in a new system next week and will move on to
6.x and if it has problems Netscrape is done at this office.
Otis Wright
I have Netscape 4.6 - my
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 01/30/03
at 12:36 AM, Otis Wright, Jr. rusty.@worldnet.att.net said:
|Ditto. Communicator 4.79 and it is beginning to have trouble with a
|lot of sites where Explorer works OK. I'm putting in a new system
|next week and will move on to
Doug Franklin wrote:
On Sun, 02 Feb 2003 03:12:02 -0500, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
Well he is using a different printer, Doug. MIght matter.
That's why I mentioned which printer I have. :-)
ann sez
O? :) I mentioned that for the benefit of others,actually, I knew you
knew but
I think
gfen wrote:
On Mon, 3 Feb 2003, Cesar Matamoros II wrote:
I will let those 24/7 locals select the where and when.
annsan sez
Would all of you who are planning to do this CC me when you chat about this - I
could then make a little
list that includes all of us in my address book - also I
Lasse Karlsson wrote:
John M. wrote:
On Sun, 02 Feb 2003 09:41:09 -0500, you wrote:
If I wanted to have an aggravating, pointless discussion, I would
go
talk to my wife.
BR
I refrained from replying to Bruce to ask him if I could supply the name
of a good divorce lawyer because
I
CBWaters wrote:
T
I also bought a box of Epson heavyweight Matte (forgive me, I like matte
finish better) today so we'll see if these look better than the Kodak stuff
I just finished. The glossy stuf is so much mroe expensive anyway. One
thing I noticed, this Epson paper is one-sided, as
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Amita wrote, in response to Ann:
Please remember there are a number of women on this list, too.
Yeah, there are, what, four of us? g We lost that nice lady from New
Zealand, right?
You two, Wendy, me ... Doe aka Marnie wandered away recently ... WHO am I
To get even more firmly on topic, what Pentaxes are the sisterhood
shooting with?
K1000
KM
Optio 230
Ann replies:
This sister shoots LX and KX - 28mm, 50mm, 100 mac f4.0 most often.
Needing to replace a
third party 70 210 zoom someday with some better glass. Sorry I sold
HErb's address was wrong -
I wondered what kept bouncing...
Herb are you getting this one???
annsan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think there were about 12 (women of PDML) (I lost count, though) -- however,
let's hold off
on the calendar until we see how well the Men of PDML calendar
sells.
better to skip it, then :)
ann
Mike P [EMAIL PROTECTED]
THis bounces - he is one of the NYPDMLERS -
Mike, if you are yout there, send me an email ?
this looks like I got the wrong one :)
annsan
Al Shaikh wrote:
I thought you guys might like a little contest. Usefilm.com is
sponsoring one with flowers as the theme. If you feel like entering feel
free. First and only prize is a set of 5 calendars of your own images.
Photographer retains all rights blah, you know the deal.
Enjoy
frank theriault wrote:
I continue to be amazed at how many on this list are
unemployed/underemployed, yet are still able to pursue this pastime,
which, let's face it, isn't the cheapest around.
Good luck finding a job, Boris. g
cheers,
frank
Because we all bought our cameras when wer
Bruce Dayton wrote:
Matt,
While making a 16X20 may be a snap for 35mm film, I would submit that
it is painfully obvious when compared to MF or LF. I personally don't
think 35mm generally looks that good beyond 11X14 - even there the
difference is obvious.
Bruce
Looks great when the 35mm
Mike Johnston wrote:
Mark,
How about cats playing in the flower bed?
Hmm...I know I have some cat photos around here somewhere...
AAUUUG!
...Which brings up another interesting question. What are the worst
photographic clichés of all time?
--Mike
DIdn't we just
Mike Johnston wrote:
Another flower for mike http://www.usefilm.com/showphoto.php?id=72
I find flowers disturbing. Especially in color.
I think it was the French painter Edgar Degas who wrote that he was
disturbed by the visual cacaphony of bouquets of flowers. He seldom painted
them,
I crop, I'd say , only about 15% of what I print. Usually because of not
having time to focus in on what
I want in the picture, shooting out of car windows, etc. I'm not
counting trimming the very edges of
the frame just a tad to eliminate vignetting or a stray hair, branch , etc
that I
Re the photo contest -
after seeing Karen Johnson's spectacularly
beautiful Dahlia on usenet I think
I had better just put my flowers
back in my drawer. Can't compete.
I've gotta get off list for a few days, though may
not
actually leave until late tonight. Be nice to
each
other while I'm
I also pointed out this was false about 3 hours ago..
boy -- sequence of mail here must be really screwed up.
But you gave more details
tomorrow I lunch with Cesar - barring the unforseen.
night night
ann
Robert Harris wrote:
Peifer, William [OCDUS] wrote:
Hi all,
Thought I'd
The Helicopters would blow stuff all around, and there
isn't enough room for them down there, Lasse. It would be
very dangerous - that is my guess.
ann
Lasse Karlsson wrote:
Those of you who might know more than me.
When the towers were hit, I never saw any helicopters even trying to make
FOr 4 hours this afternoon I dined, laughed, photoed and
walked (and walked and walked
and walked) around Manhattan with another list member who
was here mainly to visit
his parent's and sister who live in Queens. - I speak of
Cesar, and I come to praise him. :)
I brought him to my favorite
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Hi Paul ...
This is a pretty picture ... and a pretty humdrum picture. Often
breaking the rule of thirds can contribute to something pretty
interesting, but running the horizon right through the middle of this
scene reduces any interest here.
Shel, I think it is
I live about a 30 minute walk from the WTC. I have before
pictures, many, I plan to use one of those for the November
PUG,
but here are 12 pictures from the last week. None of them
are of the disaster site itself except in the distance.
Doing this small page helped me keep myself together.
Pulling TX is common, actually. Doesn't look like you used
the red filter, I would have guessed yellow. My before
pictures are months if not years old. Very sad to look at
it.
Looks like you didn't use a polarizer on the color one -
true?
After shots from that spot would be stirring... and
Jody wrote:
snip
You have a K-mart? I am so jealous. I have to drive
7hrs to get to my favourite department store, which is
in danger of closing soon, due to immense competition
from the cheap, junky Warehouse.
ANn replies:
Jody, The K-Mart in my neighborhood was considered an insult
Aaron Reynolds wrote:
Ann Sanfedele wrote:
What's a mullet?
Aaron replied
'round here, a mullet is a bad haircut sported by '80s
rockers and
hockey players of all eras: short on top, long in the back. Often
confused with hockey hair, which is hair that is just long enough to
curl
Brendan wrote:
--- Aaron Reynolds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ann Sanfedele wrote:
What's a mullet?
It's a bad tasting fish that everyone should be
fortunate they won't have to eat .
Brendon, I _swear_ I posted my response to Aaron saying a
fish was my guess before I read the above
Matamoros, Cesar A. wrote:
(a lot of stuff annsan snipping so Mike Johnson won't have a cow...)
[Cesar writes ] I am so glad she did not decide to bury me :-)
ann replies:
I'll consider whether that will be necessary after seeing
any pic he
took of me.
[Cesar writes ] To be honest,
William D. Sawyer wrote:
Hi All,
I just got some slides back from Kodak, and there was a note in the box that Kodak
is moving to plastic mounts. If requested, cardboard mounts are still available but
plastic will now be the standard.
My question is, what are people's opinions of the
Paul Jones wrote:
Just get a fine permanent felt tip pen. thats how i write on my plastic
mounted slides.
You havent seen my handwriting :)
I've found that the labels I used that have lots of typing
on them stick better
to cardboard. Is there any reason to think this is being
changed by
PAUL STENQUIST wrote:
Hi Bill,
Detroit Autographic (I think that's the name. I keep getting it wrong,
but you know who I mean: the old Meteor lab) uses plastic mounts. They
seem to keep the film relatively flat and are nice and clean. My only
gripe is that, in the case of this lab, they
I saw that subject line and the sender and deleted
immediately!
annsan
Paul Jones wrote:
Maybe you have a virus :)
- Original Message -
From: Rapture [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 2:58 PM
Subject: There, this is for your souvenir,.
I blankly received the
Photo-tech held it for 3 weeks and have now said it
cant be fixed, they cant get the parts, etc. the meter
is busted. I asked them would they please just clean it
then and they refused! they won't do a partial repair.
Anyone know where I can get it fixed??? in USA
It all seems pretty
Hoya red 52mm mint
Hoya light yellow 52m mint
$10.00 each -
I'm off to Scrabble club - haven't seen my buddies since
the event - it raineth here in the city but I'm walking
uptown nonetheless.
annsn
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to
,
and you might have to send it back, but they will eventually get it in
good working order. Their number is on the Pentax USA web site. Don't
worry, your good friend can be healed.
Paul
Ann Sanfedele wrote:
Photo-tech held it for 3 weeks and have now said it
cant be fixed, they cant get
William Robb wrote:
From the US Naval Laboratory:
Autumnal Equinox Sep 22 2001 7:05 PM EDT
I have no idea what this translates into according to Greenwich
Mean Time (is that what is called Universal Time now?)
William Robb
no clue - but as I live in EDT - I'm glad you posted that so
I have an HP Deskjet 722c - and oldy but I think not a
baddie,
but would it be a waste printing on Ilford Classic Pearl?
That is, how much of the stability and quality are in the
paper
as opposed to the ink?
annsan
Aaron Reynolds wrote:
On Tuesday, December 18, 2001, at 08:38 AM, David
Albano - keep taking lovely photos - the mountains will
help the spirit, I know, and focusing on them, literally,
will
too.
annsan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, gang.
I'm leaving for vacation this afternoon. I'm going to Patagonia zone.
I hope to forget a bit about the horrible
. -J. Robert Oppenheimer
From: Ann Sanfedele [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Professions and the PUG
Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2003 09:35:01 -0400
Was kinda surprised there were no shots of
world's oldest...
Nobody live in Vegas
Peter Alling wrote:
Please Ann, this is a family list. (Not that I didn't consider it).
now you tell me...
annsan
At 09:35 AM 10/3/03 -0400, you wrote:
Was kinda surprised there were no shots of
world's oldest...
Nobody live in Vegas or Amsterdam?? :)
annsan - feeling silly this
I bought white foamcore and made a folding screen of
sorts... 8 feet high and
3 feet side and back. Taped the corners and stashed it
away folding it like a fan.
Didn't cost much and makes a nice even light box... IF
you have a place to stash the foam core
it has the advantage of not getting
see above
annsan,
Chicago born,
saw them cubbies in 1945
Paul Stenquist wrote:
Ann...
You were a South Sider. Shame on you :-)
Paul
Ann Sanfedele wrote:
No, only for a couple of years. I lived MOSTLY on
the north side... a little north of
Wrigley field, just a couple of EL stops :)
so there. :)
ann
see above
annsan,
Chicago born
Paul wrote:
Hi,
I have 2 copies of Photoshop Elements 2.0 to give away, they both came
free with some gear i bought and i dont need them.
If any one needs and wants a copy then just email me off list, first in
best dressed.
One rule, you have to actualy need the copy :)
Regards,
Paul
Chris Brogden wrote:
The internet encourages plagiarism, so the seller may not know or care
that it was wrong to do so. I checked out the page,
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=2563924879
and he definitely claims that he had you describe it for him. I'd send
him an email
Not at all different -
join the masses :(
ann
Keith Whaley wrote:
Then my experiences are NOT all that different!
Thanks,
keith
Chris Brogden wrote:
No, no... email would be too easy. Then people might actually be able to
contact eBay without needing to book a day off work just to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Don. If you hosted the pix off eBay, the easiest way to do something is
change the original pix to something a little different, and change your URL in the
auction (possible as long as you have no bids currently).
I thought it was just his text that was lifted, i.e.,
Amita Guha wrote:
snip, snip, snip
I did have one advantage over Nate - I had two bodies, so I had to
switch lenses less often than he did. ;)
I thought the advantage of having two bodies was that you could be in more
than one
place at once :)
We had an interesting altercation with a
Ok now I got it installed -
Much more similar to other photoshop versions than
to photo deluxe which I've been
sailing through for months - couple of things I
can't find after a few tries in the help menu -
(1) can't find the tool for adding a boarder. In
photo deluxe it was under the effects
Vic, Ive tried to go there twice and with my browser (or maybe just the time of day I
tried)
it just wouldn't load. I love cats of all sizes and shapes, too.
Maybe others had difficulties as well and then time passed and it is forgotten - we
have
had a lot of traffic here lately
annsan
I've answered two of my questions ---
Ann Sanfedele wrote:
(1) can't find the tool for adding a boarder. In
photo deluxe it was under the effects
menu.
answer (just to share with others --
use the marquee tool then use, of all things, STROKE
in the edit menu,
now why in the world couldn't
The trouble with the every wedding photog I know does this argument is that
everyone's wedding pictures end up looking everyone else's. (From what I've seen
of Tom V's, however, his are clearly above the cut.) Fortunately, I've
only shot weddings when the people involved wanted to avoid the
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Ann Sanfedele
Subject: Re: correct exposure (how to shoot weddings, etc.)
I have to disagree that the most important thing in the wedding is the
wedding
dress...
Loving expressions are all very well and good, but if you don't get
1 - 100 of 17630 matches
Mail list logo
