Re: PESO - Looking up (side down)

So do I! Just thought it was fun to play with. Rick > On Feb 12, 2018, at 8:55 AM, ann sanfedele wrote: > > agree with Paul > > ann > > On 2/12/2018 1:35 AM, Paul Sorenson wrote: >> That one's nice, too, but I like the first the best. >> >> -p >> >> >> On 2/11/2018

Re: PESO - Looking up (side down)

agree with Paul ann On 2/12/2018 1:35 AM, Paul Sorenson wrote: That one's nice, too, but I like the first the best. -p On 2/11/2018 9:36 PM, Rick Womer wrote: The same as the previous photo, inverted for fun: https://www.photo.net/photo/18456655/Looking-Up-side-down Comments? Rick

Re: PESO - Looking up (side down)

That one's nice, too, but I like the first the best. -p On 2/11/2018 9:36 PM, Rick Womer wrote: The same as the previous photo, inverted for fun: https://www.photo.net/photo/18456655/Looking-Up-side-down Comments? Rick -- Paul Sorenson Studio1941 Sooner or later "different" scares

Re: PESO - Looking Up

I like this!  Cool interpretation of the MAM.  Sorry that I wasn't able to join you. -p On 2/11/2018 3:48 PM, Rick Womer wrote: From our trip to Milwaukee in October, taken at the Museum of Art: https://www.photo.net/photo/18456602/Looking-Up (K-5, DA 17-70) Comments appreciated! Rick

Re: PESO - Looking Up

Excellent! Dan Matyola http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola On Sun, Feb 11, 2018 at 4:48 PM, Rick Womer wrote: > From our trip to Milwaukee in October, taken at the Museum of Art: > > https://www.photo.net/photo/18456602/Looking-Up > > (K-5, DA 17-70) > >

Re: Peso Looking up-looking down

Well, convenient as articulating screens are, they just add another point of failure to an already complex device. I can understand why a manufacturer would forgo making models with this feature. On 7/30/2013 12:19 PM, Darren Addy wrote: THIS is the reason for articulating LCD screens. I

Re: Peso Looking up-looking down

THIS is the reason for articulating LCD screens. I think that if camera companies are going to make duplicate models except for the anti-alias filter then they could also make duplicate models with/without an articulating LCD screen. On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 10:16 AM, David J Brooks

Re: Peso Looking up-looking down

Another point of failure? Sure, sort of like electric windows, air conditioning and other options on cars. On balance, it should be up to the consumer whether he wishes to have them or not. Sales figures would determine whether it was worthwhile for a company to offer the option or now. It would

Re: Peso Looking up-looking down

EDIT: or now should be or not. On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 11:40 AM, Darren Addy pixelsmi...@gmail.com wrote: Another point of failure? Sure, sort of like electric windows, air conditioning and other options on cars. On balance, it should be up to the consumer whether he wishes to have them or

Re: Peso Looking up-looking down

It is, you can always get a Nikon D5100. Pentax chooses not to have that point of failure. Just yesterday I was walking out of a local dry goods emporium when I was almost bowled over by an unhappy customer Kuerig coffee maker clutched to their breast, with murder in their eye, on the way to

Re: Peso Looking up-looking down

hehe - hope she can get up! ann On 7/30/2013 11:16, David J Brooks wrote: http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=17480450 The photographer is lying on the ground looking up i assume to try and get all of the CN Tower in the back ground. Dave -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net

Re: Peso Looking up-looking down

On 30/07/2013 10:40 AM, Darren Addy wrote: Another point of failure? Sure, sort of like electric windows, air conditioning and other options on cars. On balance, it should be up to the consumer whether he wishes to have them or not. Sales figures would determine whether it was worthwhile for a

Re: Peso Looking up-looking down

: Darren Addy pixelsmi...@gmail.com Subject: Re: Peso Looking up-looking down Another point of failure? Sure, sort of like electric windows, air conditioning and other options on cars. On balance, it should be up to the consumer whether he wishes to have them or not. Sales figures would determine

Re: PESO -- Looking Up Stream

and tomorrow we get the snow again I like both of your stream shots, PJ - tranquil and inviting scenes ann P. J. Alling wrote: Another from my not quite spring suite. http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1604247/PESO/PESO%20--%20lookingupstream.html Equipment: Pentax K20D w/smc Pentax FA 20-35mm

Re: PESO - Looking up

Nice shot. I like it with the plain background like that. Dave Quoting Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Quite a difference in technique for me with this one. Pentax *istD, DA 16-45/4 @ 45mm, handheld ISO 400, 1/500 sec @ f/9.5 http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_3417a.htm Comments welcome

Re: PESO - Looking up

A nice composition. The effect is similar to shooting against a backlit screen in the studio. I like it. Paul On Sep 29, 2006, at 1:36 AM, Bruce Dayton wrote: Quite a difference in technique for me with this one. Pentax *istD, DA 16-45/4 @ 45mm, handheld ISO 400, 1/500 sec @ f/9.5

Re: PESO - Looking up

Yes, rather different from your usual: my eyes squint at the glare of the clouds above! You did a good job of rending on such a high contrast photo. Godfrey On Sep 28, 2006, at 10:36 PM, Bruce Dayton wrote: Quite a difference in technique for me with this one. Pentax *istD, DA 16-45/4 @

Re: PESO - Looking up

Bruce Dayton wrote: Quite a difference in technique for me with this one. Pentax *istD, DA 16-45/4 @ 45mm, handheld ISO 400, 1/500 sec @ f/9.5 http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_3417a.htm Comments welcome I like the try at a different perspective, but the glaring sky really bothers

Re: PESO - Looking up

Beautiful! What kind of tree is this? Rick --- Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Quite a difference in technique for me with this one. Pentax *istD, DA 16-45/4 @ 45mm, handheld ISO 400, 1/500 sec @ f/9.5 http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_3417a.htm Comments welcome --

Re: PESO - Looking up

Thanks, Paul. I bracketed the shots and played around with it PP and and felt the high key worked best. -- Bruce Friday, September 29, 2006, 3:19:50 AM, you wrote: PS A nice composition. The effect is similar to shooting against a backlit PS screen in the studio. I like it. PS Paul PS On Sep

Re: PESO - Looking up

This was some taller plant - not really a tree or bush. I really have no idea what it might be called. Thanks for looking. -- Best regards, Bruce Friday, September 29, 2006, 8:05:14 AM, you wrote: RW Beautiful! What kind of tree is this? RW Rick RW --- Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: PESO - Looking up

Sorry to make you squint. I tried a lowering the background a bit and didn't like it as well. Thanks for looking. -- Best regards, Bruce Friday, September 29, 2006, 6:35:03 AM, you wrote: GD Yes, rather different from your usual: my eyes squint at the glare of GD the clouds above! GD You

Re: PESO - Looking up

I did play with the sky quite a bit and preferred what is shown. Maybe what I like about it is the high key effect. I do appreciate the look and opinion. It always helps me to work for improvement. -- Best regards, Bruce Friday, September 29, 2006, 7:18:39 AM, you wrote: C Bruce Dayton

Re: PESO - Looking up

Photographically, I can't fault it, but the subject doesn't do anything for me. Might have more impact if it was B+W? Kenneth Waller - Original Message - From: Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: PESO - Looking up Quite a difference in technique for me with this one. Pentax

Re: PESO - Looking up

On 9/29/06, Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Quite a difference in technique for me with this one. Pentax *istD, DA 16-45/4 @ 45mm, handheld ISO 400, 1/500 sec @ f/9.5 http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_3417a.htm Gorgeous! I love the simple, starkness of it. cheers, frank --

Re: PESO - Looking up

nice on the exposure. I like the composition, it's very simple. russell On 9/28/06, Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Quite a difference in technique for me with this one. Pentax *istD, DA 16-45/4 @ 45mm, handheld ISO 400, 1/500 sec @ f/9.5 http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_3417a.htm