On Fri, 3 Aug 2012 11:09:03 +0200, Peter van Dijk wrote:
these NSEC3-changes have now been merged into our SVN trunk, at
revision 2687 (with additional work in 2688+2689, but these should not
make a functional difference). I have asked Bert to do snapshot static
rpm/deb builds today.
Not sure
Hello Christof,
On Aug 4, 2012, at 10:09 , Christof Meerwald wrote:
Not sure if this is just nsec3dig prdoucing confusing output or if
it's pdns itself. cmeerw.priv.at (bind zone file) only has 1 SOA and 2
NS records.
nsec3dig for x.cmeerw.priv.at then results in:
Reply to question for
On Fri, Aug 03, 2012 at 11:09:03AM +0200, Peter van Dijk wrote:
these NSEC3-changes have now been merged into our SVN trunk, at revision 2687
(with additional work in 2688+2689, but these should not make a functional
difference). I have asked Bert to do snapshot static rpm/deb builds today.
Hello,
these NSEC3-changes have now been merged into our SVN trunk, at revision 2687
(with additional work in 2688+2689, but these should not make a functional
difference). I have asked Bert to do snapshot static rpm/deb builds today.
Your comments are still welcome!
Kind regards,
--
Peter
Hello fellow developers,
summary: please review our NSEC3 code at
https://github.com/habbie/powerdns/tree/fixnsec3 or
https://github.com/Habbie/powerdns/compare/master…fixnsec3 !
Longer version:
prompted by recent big-scale DNSSEC rollouts (PowerDNS is responsible for a
large part of the
