On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 01:10:36PM -0700, Zane Thomas wrote:
Cross-posting to dev
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 9:35 AM, Zane Thomas zane.tho...@gmail.com wrote:
I think I'd like to see an option which provided for queries to be simply
dropped until the queue was back to a reasonable size.
PowerDNS Authoritative Server 3.0-RC3
This is fully expected to be the 'real 3.0' release! It can be downloaded from:
http://downloads.powerdns.com/releases/pdns-3.0-rc3.tar.gz
http://downloads.powerdns.com/releases/rpm/pdns-static-3.0rc3-1.x86_64.rpm
On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 06:07:44PM -0400, Andrew Boling wrote:
canonical name. The current implementation causes problems with software
that uses any form of name validation against PTR records (i.e. SSL certs or
Kerberos auth).
Well.. I don't think that gets you far anyhow.
I am aware of
Hi Gregory! Many thanks for this!
Nick, as you own the LDAP backend now, could you let me know your thoughts?
You can get the patches from the pdns-dev archive which can be found from
wiki.powerdns.com.
Thanks.
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 09:51:35PM +0200, Grégory Oestreicher wrote:
Hi All,
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 02:00:02PM -0700, Zane Thomas wrote:
Sorry about that, will be sure to note use of my own backend in the future.
I suggest we move this discussion to pdns-dev.
This following code is setting weHaveUnauth to true because sd.qname !=
rr.qname
// the line below
Please see my off-list reply.
--
PowerDNS Website: http://www.powerdns.com/
PowerDNS Community Website: http://wiki.powerdns.com/
On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 07:45:28AM -0700, Zane Thomas wrote:
ping
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 11:00 PM, bert hubert
bert.hub...@netherlabs.nlwrote:
On Mon
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 12:52:03AM -0800, Ask Bjørn Hansen wrote:
I tried applying the patch to one of my NS'es; it doesn't seem to set the
aa flag still. The only difference (I could spot) from 3.0.1 is that the
NS records are not included when querying for the DS (I'm guessing that's
an
On Fri, Aug 03, 2012 at 11:09:03AM +0200, Peter van Dijk wrote:
these NSEC3-changes have now been merged into our SVN trunk, at revision 2687
(with additional work in 2688+2689, but these should not make a functional
difference). I have asked Bert to do snapshot static rpm/deb builds today.
On Sun, Oct 07, 2012 at 12:59:34PM +1100, Justin Clift wrote:
/usr/include/netinet6/in6.h:#define IPV6_PKTINFOIPV6_2292PKTINFO
/usr/include/netinet6/in6.h:#define IPV6_RECVPKTINFO61 /* bool;
recv if, dst addr
/usr/include/netinet6/in6.h:#define IPV6_PKTINFO
On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 11:27:08AM -0700, Zane Thomas wrote:
I've searched but for some reason I cannot discover where KeyData.id is
initialized when adding a key.
Hi Zane,
It is 'set' when reading from the database. See
backends/gsql/gsqlbackend.cc.
The database picks an ID for us.
On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 11:07:58AM +0100, Posner, Sebastian wrote:
When erroneously a CNAME is present for a label as well as other data
like an A-record; pdns answers queries for the label with only the CNAME
while including _all_ data in an AXFR of the zone, without even logging
the
Hi developers,
If you ever feel the need to add a new dns record type to PowerDNS, we
documented this on
http://bert-hubert.blogspot.nl/2012/11/adding-new-dns-record-types-to-powerdns.html
Thanks!
Bert
--
PowerDNS Website: http://www.powerdns.com/
PowerDNS Community Website:
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 07:58:07PM +0100, a b wrote:
In my experience, Boost is one of the biggest obstacles in getting pdns to
build.
With that in mind, I propose to completely disengage pdns from any and all
Boost libraries in order to remove it as a dependency.
Hi 'a b',
While I agree
On Jul 5, 2013, at 4:14 PM, jus...@postgresql.org wrote:
http://downloads.powerdns.com/releases/pdns-3.3.tar.gz
Still broken on OSX, as reported for the -rc2 of this. :(
Sorry for this, the best way to prevent this is to open an issue on GitHub, our
memory for reports on the list is less
https://github.com/PowerDNS/pdns/commit/cd4f253
- 1.35.
On Jul 7, 2013, at 3:31 PM, a b wrote:
cd4f253
___
Pdns-dev mailing list
Pdns-dev@mailman.powerdns.com
http://mailman.powerdns.com/mailman/listinfo/pdns-dev
Hi everybody,
It so happens that a number of PowerDNS contributors are coming to The Hague
on Friday 4th of October, so we are doing a small meetup!
If you are a PowerDNS user or contributor, you are cordially invited to join
us for drinks around 20:00 local time on the 4th of October.
We're
Hi everybody,
Just to let you know that the meetup is on, and we'll be with 5 people so
far. So feel free to contact me to join us, you won't be alone ;-)
Five is a good number but 10 is better.
Hoping to meet you in The Hague!
Bert
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 10:56:25AM +0200, bert
Hi everybody,
As an aside to these giant impressive release notes, I would like to thank
the PowerDNS open source community for the tremendous amount of work
invested in 3.4.0. It is astounding.
For a small overview, check for example:
https://github.com/PowerDNS/pdns/network/members
On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 02:00:34PM -0600, List wrote:
Hello, new to PDNS and wondering if there is a CQL Cassandra backend
that's been created, or one in the works? We utilize Cassandra for
a number of services and would like to give multi-datacenter
availability to our zone records if
On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 12:17:28PM -0800, Zane Thomas wrote:
I designed and wrote the backend currently used by eNom's dns servers,
dns1 through 5.name-services.com, and am available for custom backend
development or modifications of existing backends.
Hi Zane,
That is very interesting to
Hi everybody,
We just posted this on our blog
http://blog.powerdns.com/2015/06/23/what-is-a-powerdns-backend-and-how-do-i-make-it-send-an-nxdomain/
PowerDNS is a dynamic nameserver, with a ton of backends. If the supplied
backends aren’t flexible enough, our architecture enable operators to
Hi everybody,
Here's a bunch of announcements all in one message so we don't bother you
too much.
1) We have a new employee! Please welcome Remi Gacogne, who will be
developing and working on all things PowerDNS starting next week. Since
we've become part of Open-Xchange, we've gained new users
on CentOS 7 ?
Best Regards
Burak Özalp
Alinti Burak Ozalp burak.oz...@metu.edu.tr
It works! Thank you for all. I did when i want finally.
Best Regards
Burak Ozalp
Alinti bert hubert bert.hub...@powerdns.com
Hi Burak,
I just tested this:
addLocal(0.0.0.0:5200
(127.0.0.1)
;; WHEN: Tue Aug 25 16:16:23 EEST 2015
;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 191
Alinti bert hubert bert.hub...@powerdns.com
Does it print out anything at all?
Can you show a 'dig' command that shows TC:0 response and no fallback to
TCP/IP?
Thanks!
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 02:52:33PM
sent from the wrong account first, sorry.
Begin forwarded message:
Subject: Re: [Pdns-dev] How to set PowerDNS Server with option any-to-tcp
From: bert hubert bert.hub...@netherlabs.nl
Date: 25 Aug 2015 12:39:05 CEST
Cc: Aki Tuomi cmo...@youzen.ext.b2.fi, pdns-dev@mailman.powerdns.com
On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 10:16:28AM -0700, John Sutherland wrote:
> This morning, I received notifications on a few tickets I had out on the
> LMDB backend. It mentions that LMDB is getting dropped in it current
> form. Does this mean that there’s a new version of it in the works, or is
> it
On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 01:00:25PM +0300, Cristian Seres wrote:
> Has PowerDNS any plans to support this feature? Black lies seem to solve
> many issues with NSEC/NSEC3 in a rather elegant way and at least according
> to CloudFlare, also complying standards.
Hi Cristian,
You mean NSEC3 narrow
On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 02:00:36PM +0300, Cristian Seres wrote:
> no, I mean the CloudFlare's solution that is rather different. According to
> the link I sent this approach has following benefits:
> - minimal information revealed, missing name \000 sent as the next name in
> NSEC reply and using
On Thu, Oct 05, 2017 at 04:54:32PM +0500, Saeed Ahmed wrote:
> Hi,
> I am using pdns_recursor-4.0.5. Here, what I wanna do is when a client
> queries the server, I want to intercept the request, and before any
> processing, do some check and on certain condition send response back to
> client
On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 03:51:12PM -0400, James Cloos wrote:
> Has any work been done on adding support for dns/tls on port 853 to the
> auth server?
>
> It should be done in the server itself, so that eg statistics in the
> webserver remain accurate and because more daemons are additional points
On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 11:47:49AM -0800, Angelo Ovidi wrote:
> in modern Cloud environment is now almost essential to support PROXY
> protocol version 1 (and 2) in order to bypass the limitation in terms of
> losing the source IP of a customer trough global balancers.
Hi Angelo,
Within DNS we
On Sun, Dec 02, 2018 at 12:00:11AM +0530, Abhijith PA wrote:
> The fix for CVE-2018-14644 in 4.0.9 can't backport to 3.x older versions
> due to the list initialization
>
Hi Abhijith,
We really can't recommend continuing to run 3.x in production, please see
On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 12:51:24PM -0400, Brian Sullivan wrote:
> I was expecting to see a line for DoH?
Me too. Can you try:
showDOHFrontends()
And see what it reports? Can you double check it is reading the right
configuration file?
Bert
33 matches
Mail list logo
