Re: [Pdns-users] DNSSEC and Master/Slave setup

2011-02-03 Thread bert hubert
this: 4294967296 2011020300 .. 2011020301 .. 2011020302 etc This means that if we do the 'obvious' and leave the first six digits alone, we can only do 99 increments, which is not enough by a long shot. However, '20110203' only encodes a day number, and there have been 15008 days since the beginning

[Pdns-users] signingpipe.hh not in snapshot 1964

2011-02-03 Thread M Techter
Hi, being interested in DNSSEC support of pdns, I tried to build from the pdns-3.0-pre.20110202.1964 snapshot. Doing ./configure --cache-file=/tmp/config.cache --with-modules= CC=ccache gcc make I ran up in the

Re: [Pdns-users] signingpipe.hh not in snapshot 1964

2011-02-03 Thread bert hubert
On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 09:25:04PM +0100, M Techter wrote: being interested in DNSSEC support of pdns, I tried to build from the pdns-3.0-pre.20110202.1964 Good catch - we fixed the issue in SVN already. Meanwhile,