Re: [Pdns-users] PDNS Recursor on Debian / Low performance !!!URGENT!!!!

2011-02-07 Thread Maroon Ibrahim
As for the file descriptors, I already added the following: - in sysctl.conf : fs.file-max = 65535 - in /etc/init.d/pdns-recursor #!/bin/sh # chkconfig: - 80 75 # description: pdns_recursor is a versatile high performance recursing nameserver ulimit -HSn 65536 How can I know that the

Re: [Pdns-users] PDNS Recursor on Debian / Low performance !!!URGENT!!!!

2011-02-07 Thread bert hubert
On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 09:17:29AM +, Maroon Ibrahim wrote: As for the file descriptors, I already added the following: - in sysctl.conf : fs.file-max = 65535 - in /etc/init.d/pdns-recursor #!/bin/sh # chkconfig: - 80 75 # description: pdns_recursor is a versatile high

Re: [Pdns-users] PDNS Recursor on Debian / Low performance !!!URGENT!!!!

2011-02-07 Thread Maroon Ibrahim
### Before run-test DNS:/# rec_control get-all all-outqueries 501740 dlg-only-drops 0 dont-outqueries 26 outgoing-timeouts 352596 tcp-outqueries 35 throttled-out 76300 throttled-outqueries76300 unreachables426

Re: [Pdns-users] PDNS Recursor on Debian / Low performance !!!URGENT!!!!

2011-02-07 Thread Stefan Schmidt
On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 09:38:42AM +, Maroon Ibrahim wrote: ... AS for the recursor.conf... I still didn't touch it what is your best recommendation to have the opimum cache?? Please advise It depends on how much RAM you can spare. Setting max-cache-entries=100 will use

Re: [Pdns-users] PDNS Recursor on Debian / Low performance !!!URGENT!!!!

2011-02-07 Thread Maroon Ibrahim
Thanks Stefan... SO, you just recommend to play only with max-cache-entries...? I have 4GB ram and Xeon CPU. is it possible to cache the entries on disk?? is it recommended also? Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2011 10:45:51 +0100 From: zaph...@zaphods.net To: maroon_ibra...@hotmail.com CC:

Re: [Pdns-users] PDNS Recursor on Debian / Low performance !!!URGENT!!!!

2011-02-07 Thread Stefan Schmidt
i forgot to CC the list on that one. - Forwarded message from Stefan Schmidt zaph...@zaphods.net - Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2011 10:23:54 +0100 From: Stefan Schmidt zaph...@zaphods.net To: Maroon Ibrahim maroon_ibra...@hotmail.com Subject: Re: [Pdns-users] PDNS Recursor on Debian / Low

Re: [Pdns-users] PDNS Recursor on Debian / Low performance !!!URGENT!!!!

2011-02-07 Thread Stefan Schmidt
On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 09:48:30AM +, Maroon Ibrahim wrote: Thanks Stefan... SO, you just recommend to play only with max-cache-entries...? I have 4GB ram and Xeon CPU. Let me put it this way: Using a standard recursor.conf you should not need to tweak much more than the

Re: [Pdns-users] PDNS Recursor on Debian / Low performance !!!URGENT!!!!

2011-02-07 Thread Maroon Ibrahim
Hi Bert, got some time to have a look on my bad results :( ?? Thank you in advance, Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2011 10:21:23 +0100 From: bert.hub...@netherlabs.nl To: maroon_ibra...@hotmail.com CC: pdns-users@mailman.powerdns.com Subject: Re: [Pdns-users] PDNS Recursor on Debian / Low

Re: [Pdns-users] PDNS Recursor on Debian / Low performance !!!URGENT!!!!

2011-02-07 Thread Maroon Ibrahim
WOW! Thanks for the info Bert :) The Debian server that hosts PDNS Cursor doesn't apply any iptable rule... but this server is behind a firewall (MikorTik Router) and this firewall has tracking feature turned on...maybe because of that!!! and my uplstream connection is only 1 Mbps full

Re: [Pdns-users] AXFR problem with pdns snapshots

2011-02-07 Thread Jan-Piet Mens
This has been fixed in revision 1992. Can you confirm? It is working again. Thanks for the quick fix! -JP ___ Pdns-users mailing list Pdns-users@mailman.powerdns.com http://mailman.powerdns.com/mailman/listinfo/pdns-users

Re: [Pdns-users] AXFR problem with pdns snapshots

2011-02-07 Thread Christof Meerwald
On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 08:40:56PM +0100, Christof Meerwald wrote: On Mon, 7 Feb 2011 17:17:52 +0100, bert hubert wrote: On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 02:39:56PM +0100, bert.hub...@netherlabs.nl wrote: Thanks for reporting, we are on the case! The issue has been confirmed. This has been fixed in

Re: [Pdns-users] AXFR problem with pdns snapshots

2011-02-07 Thread bert hubert
On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 10:24:53PM +0100, Christof Meerwald wrote: Ok, think I have found it - Microsoft DNS doesn't seem to like the EDNS options in the AXFR packets. Guess that's why it says WRONG in tcpreceiver.cc, line 410... Our EDNS-in-AXFR has been brought in line with RFC 5936 now. I