Hi Peter,
Am 21.09.21 um 18:20 schrieb Peter van Dijk via Pdns-users:
Hello Thomas,
On Tue, 2021-09-21 at 13:53 +0200, Thomas Mieslinger via Pdns-users
wrote:
dog.80 IN NSEC domains. NS DS RRSIG NSEC
This looks like aggressive NSEC reuse (
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc
On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 06:20:16PM +0200, Peter van Dijk via Pdns-users wrote:
> Hello Thomas,
>
> On Tue, 2021-09-21 at 13:53 +0200, Thomas Mieslinger via Pdns-users
> wrote:
> > dog.80 IN NSEC domains. NS DS RRSIG NSEC
>
> This looks like aggressive NSEC reuse (
> https://d
Hello Thomas,
On Tue, 2021-09-21 at 13:53 +0200, Thomas Mieslinger via Pdns-users
wrote:
> dog.80 IN NSEC domains. NS DS RRSIG NSEC
This looks like aggressive NSEC reuse (
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8198) and/or NXDOMAIN: There
Really Is Nothing Underneath (
http
Hi,
we're experiencing the problem that pdns_recursor (4.3.5 and 4.5.1)
answers with the information from the . zone instead of what we have
configured in forward.zone.
Some configuration details (please name the setting you additionally
need to diagnose the problem further)
forward.zones:
...