Hi Lee,
In the past few months, quite some CNS servers have been replaced by the
PowerDNS Recursor, so you are not alone!
The 40,000 number has been reproduced by a number of separate parties,
sample output is below.
First, please read http://doc.powerdns.com/recursor-performance.html
First things first: use threads=4 or threads=8 and packet-cache.
This is how I did it:
Run a couple of dnsperf's like this:
./dnsperf -d queryfile-example-3million -s IP -p port -t 2 -l
$((3600*10)) -q 2000 -Q 2000 logfile.log 21
This will run a dnsperf from a queryfile for 10 hours (so you
@mailman.powerdns.com
Subject: Re: [Pdns-users] Acheiving 40,000 QPS
Hi Lee,
In the past few months, quite some CNS servers have been replaced by the
PowerDNS Recursor, so you are not alone!
The 40,000 number has been reproduced by a number of separate parties,
sample output is below.
First, please read http
2010 3:23 PM
To: bert hubert
Cc: pdns-users@mailman.powerdns.com
Subject: Re: [Pdns-users] Acheiving 40,000 QPS
Thanks for that information, Bert.
I had seen the documentation before... perhaps I should provide some more
information.
Here are the options I'm using at the moment (I've tried
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 03:23:21PM +0800, Lee Standen wrote:
Thanks for that information, Bert.
I had seen the documentation before... perhaps I should provide some more
information.
Here are the options I'm using at the moment (I've tried several values):
-users-boun...@mailman.powerdns.com] On Behalf Of Lee
Standen
Sent: Monday, May 17, 2010 12:57 AM
To: pdns-users@mailman.powerdns.com
Subject: Re: [Pdns-users] Acheiving 40,000 QPS
Looks like I've narrowed down the issue from this setup.
The issue was one of concurrency... by boosting it up to 4000
Hi All,
We're looking to trial PowerDNS as an option to replace our Nominum CNS servers
in the next few months, and we're impressed by the performance claimed by
PowerDNS.
I've deployed a recursive server and have attempted to replay some captured
traffic, but based on my initial testing, I'm
