On 06/08/2010, at 3:54 PM, Ton van Rosmalen wrote:
No, this is not a restriction. In our setup we've added the ip address
in the supermasters-table like this:
+---++--+
| ip| nameserver | account |
On 06 Aug 2010 wk 31, at 09:56, Richard McLean wrote:
On 06/08/2010, at 3:54 PM, Ton van Rosmalen wrote:
No, this is not a restriction. In our setup we've added the ip address
in the supermasters-table like this:
+---++--+
| ip|
Hi Richard,
On Fri, 2010-08-06 at 15:27 +1000, Richard McLean wrote:
I have wondered about this. We'd love to implement a hidden supermaster type
setup, using AXFR, which auto-updates the 4 main name servers, but is *not*
in the list of name servers for a domain and is not publicly
Hi Richard,
Richard McLean schreef:
Hi all,
From Stefan's answer yesterday on the AXFR question:
On 06/08/2010, at 12:55 AM, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
The set of NS records for the domain, as retrieved by the slave from the
supermaster, must include the name that goes with the IP address
