Re: [Pdns-users] Re: dnsreplay "mostly correct"?

2007-07-26 Thread Augie Schwer
On 7/22/07, bert hubert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 11:40:06AM -0700, Augie Schwer wrote: > Never mind, sorry for the spam, they are different. :) Hehe - however, do try to use the newer 'dnsreplay' from svn, it is a lot more precise and actually has options. Any chance f

Re: [Pdns-users] Re: dnsreplay "mostly correct"?

2007-07-22 Thread bert hubert
On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 11:40:06AM -0700, Augie Schwer wrote: > Never mind, sorry for the spam, they are different. :) Hehe - however, do try to use the newer 'dnsreplay' from svn, it is a lot more precise and actually has options. Bert -- http://www.PowerDNS.com Open source, data

[Pdns-users] Re: dnsreplay "mostly correct"?

2007-07-20 Thread Augie Schwer
Never mind, sorry for the spam, they are different. :) On 7/20/07, Augie Schwer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I am not sure how to interpret this result from dnsreplay (out of svn): 'nwinsure.com.|#15', with id 41614 from 0.0.8.7:33321 to 209.204.159.20:53, orig rcode: 0, ours: 0, 2 vs 2, perfect: