Re: [Pdns-users] Successful, yet incomplete AXFR to BIND9 slave

2010-09-09 Thread Nikolaos Milas
Hi Bert, Trying to find a solution, I removed from LDAP both the record that appeared last in AXFR and the one after it, and then retried. This time the AXFR set contained as a last record the next in sequence, but still contained the same

Re: [Pdns-users] Successful, yet incomplete AXFR to BIND9 slave

2010-09-09 Thread Christian Hofstaedtler
Nikolas, * Nikolaos Milas nmi...@admin.noa.gr [100909 09:40]: Hi Bert, Trying to find a solution, I removed from LDAP both the record that appeared last in AXFR and the one after it, and then retried. This time the AXFR set contained as a last record the next in sequence, but

Re: [Pdns-users] Successful, yet incomplete AXFR to BIND9 slave

2010-09-09 Thread Nikolaos Milas
Thanks Christian, That did the trick! Now AXFR works fine! I set sizelimit unlimited in slapd.conf You were right. The default max size in openldap is 500 and I didn't know it. Would you have any hint about the Authority issue as well? Thanks again, Nick On 9/9/2010 11:07 πμ,

Re: [Pdns-users] Successful, yet incomplete AXFR to BIND9 slave

2010-09-09 Thread Nikolaos Milas
I found the answer here: http://doc.powerdns.com/pdns-users-faq.html (Question 3) as was indicated here: http://mailman.powerdns.com/pipermail/pdns-users/2006-November/003953.html So this thread is considered solved. Thanks. On

Re: [Pdns-users] Successful, yet incomplete AXFR to BIND9 slave

2010-09-09 Thread Kenneth Marshall
Hi Nikolaos, A small suggestion, it is much easier to read posts to mailing lists if they are in text format and not html/doc/pdf/... This is what I see. :) Cheers, Ken On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 01:59:41PM +0300, Nikolaos Milas wrote: !DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN

[Pdns-users] Successful, yet incomplete AXFR to BIND9 slave

2010-09-08 Thread Nikolaos Milas
In my pdns/ldap (tree) on CentOS 5.5, I am setting up a domain (say: 'example.com')  with its single SOA record. This has several virtual subzones (a.example.com, b.example.com etc.) which include their own MX records but are not delegated: the same NS

Re: [Pdns-users] Successful, yet incomplete AXFR to BIND9 slave

2010-09-08 Thread Nikolaos Milas
Indeed, I have confirmed that pdns does not send a complete set of records during AXFR, by executing: # dig example.com AXFR @dns.example.com where dns.example.com is the pdns/ldap server. The output is exactly the content of slave files. So, why aren't all zone records included in the

Re: [Pdns-users] Successful, yet incomplete AXFR to BIND9 slave

2010-09-08 Thread bert hubert
On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 12:10:53AM +0300, Nikolaos Milas wrote: Indeed, I have confirmed that pdns does not send a complete set of records during AXFR, by executing: # dig example.com AXFR @dns.example.com where dns.example.com is the pdns/ldap server. The output is exactly the