On Thu, Jan 04, 2007 at 03:57:51PM -0800, Augie Schwer wrote:
> Here is where the spurious SOA gets inserted:
The issue has been resolved by
http://wiki.powerdns.com/cgi-bin/trac.fcgi/changeset/947
Nothing in the regression test broke, so it should be safe. Also added a
regression test to ensure
On 12/21/06, bert hubert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, Dec 21, 2006 at 10:00:30AM -0800, gnu not unix wrote:
> I have a problem with my parent zone (sf.ca.us), where they
> are running powerdns (they used to run bind), and this change
> seems to have resulted in my loss of email connectivity
On 12/22/06, Augie Schwer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 12/21/06, bert hubert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 21, 2006 at 10:00:30AM -0800, gnu not unix wrote:
> One thing that looks odd, but is completely legal, is that you have an NS
> record pointing to the name of your zone. Conceiva
These came to me instead of the list; perhaps the List Admins can add
a "reply-to" header to list traffic?
-- Forwarded message --
From: Eric Robibaro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Dec 23, 2006 9:13 AM
Subject: Re: [Pdns-users] mx failure scenario
To: Augie Schwer &
These came to me instead of the list; perhaps the List Admins can add
a "reply-to" header to list traffic?
-- Forwarded message --
From: gnu not unix <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Dec 22, 2006 4:10 PM
Subject: Re: [Pdns-users] mx failure scenario
To: Augie Schwer &
On 12/21/06, bert hubert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, Dec 21, 2006 at 10:00:30AM -0800, gnu not unix wrote:
One thing that looks odd, but is completely legal, is that you have an NS
record pointing to the name of your zone. Conceivably, this might be
confusing PowerDNS, as this is somewhat
On Thu, Dec 21, 2006 at 10:40:09PM +0100, bert hubert wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 21, 2006 at 10:00:30AM -0800, gnu not unix wrote:
>
> > I have a problem with my parent zone (sf.ca.us), where they
> > are running powerdns (they used to run bind), and this change
> > seems to have resulted in my loss of
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wr
ite:
>On 12/21/06, gnu not unix <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
(dns problems...)
>I'm not sure I see a problem:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ dig mx wraith.sf.ca.us +short
>512 smidge.wraith.sf.ca.us.
>http://www.dnsreport.com/tools/dnsreport.ch?domain=wraith.sf.ca.us
On Thu, Dec 21, 2006 at 10:00:30AM -0800, gnu not unix wrote:
> I have a problem with my parent zone (sf.ca.us), where they
> are running powerdns (they used to run bind), and this change
> seems to have resulted in my loss of email connectivity.
Something definitely is odd:
$ dig +norecurs -t mx
On 12/21/06, gnu not unix <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have a problem with my parent zone (sf.ca.us), where they
are running powerdns (they used to run bind), and this change
seems to have resulted in my loss of email connectivity.
It seems that an MX query to the sf.ca.us (parent zone) powerdns
Hi folks--
I have a problem with my parent zone (sf.ca.us), where they
are running powerdns (they used to run bind), and this change
seems to have resulted in my loss of email connectivity.
It seems that an MX query to the sf.ca.us (parent zone) powerdns
name server for wraith.sf.ca.us is return
11 matches
Mail list logo
