Re: [Pdns-users] Rcode 3 NXDOMAIN for existing CNAME

2023-03-25 Thread Christoph via Pdns-users
 >> However, I doubt this is a reasonable approach for your ACME  >> client. Sounds like a simple enough solution to me, can you elaborate why you doubt it is reasonable? My understanding is that ACME is about whether there is a TXT RRset with the challenge record; if it is not there, it's

Re: [Pdns-users] Rcode 3 NXDOMAIN for existing CNAME

2023-03-25 Thread Peter Thomassen via Pdns-users
On 3/25/23 11:44, Christoph wrote: >> However, I doubt this is a reasonable approach for your ACME >> client. Sounds like a simple enough solution to me, can you elaborate why you doubt it is reasonable? My understanding is that ACME is about whether there is a TXT RRset with the

Re: [Pdns-users] Rcode 3 NXDOMAIN for existing CNAME

2023-03-25 Thread Peter Thomassen via Pdns-users
On 3/25/23 14:04, Christoph wrote: My understanding is that ACME is about whether there is a TXT RRset with the challenge record; if it is not there, it's irrelevant whether the outcome is NXDOMAIN or NODATA/NOERROR. OK, now I understand where the misunderstanding comes from. Thanks for