On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 11:36:26AM -0700, Jordan Tardif wrote:
> >The whole 'tcpreceiver' subsystem has been cleaned up now, and should be
> >more robust. Some more cleanups are pending though.
The additional cleanups, plus the fix for the reported 'signal 6' problems,
are available in snapshot 9
Thanks Bert!
--
Jordan Tardif
DreamHost
On Sun, 18 Mar 2007, bert hubert wrote:
As reported in http://wiki.powerdns.com/cgi-bin/trac.fcgi/ticket/118 ,
This was one of the most reported PowerDNS problems, and it has been fixed
in commit 980, available on http://svn.powerdns.com/snapshots/980
T
On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 05:56:23PM +0100, Simon Pearce wrote:
> I also gave the 980 snapshot a test on 2 of our production servers and
> it crashed within minutes with
Many thanks, from this I can see what the problem is.
> Mar 19 14:29:33 rs2 pdns-canhost[13098]: Got a signal 6, attempting to
>
I also gave the 980 snapshot a test on 2 of our production servers and
it crashed within minutes with
Mar 19 14:29:33 rs2 pdns-canhost[13098]: Got a signal 6, attempting to
print trace:
Mar 19 14:29:33 rs2 pdns-canhost[13098]: /usr/sbin/pdns_server-instance
[0x80b6324]
Mar 19 14:29:33 rs2 pdns-
Bert,
Last Week I sent to your e-mail you many information about this errors, did you
receive?
Below follow information about this problem:
PS: Domaintest is a fiction domain
In PDNS Server, We see this messages from tcpdump:
17:41:13.44 200.234.202.2.1104 > 200.234.202.5.domain: 4191 A?
On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 04:33:08PM +0100, Massimo Bandinelli wrote:
> I tried the release 980. No problems during load and reloads.
>
> When I start query dns, it crashes with the "Got signal 6" error.
No backtrace? Can you compile yourself, and see if it generates a backtrace?
Thanks.
--
http
I tried the release 980. No problems during load and reloads.
When I start query dns, it crashes with the "Got signal 6" error.
Thanks for you help.
Fighting against Bind forever,
Massimo.
Massimo Bandinelli
Chief System Administrator
---
Register.it S.p.A.
