Re: [Pdns-users] Differing (incorrect) behavior in 2.9.21 for AAAA records versus 2.9.20...

2007-08-11 Thread bert hubert
On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 11:06:23AM -0700, Augie Schwer wrote: > > A fix is in svn, so I wonder if people can verify that it solves the > > problem. > > Good luck! > > That looks like it fixes it Bert. I'll have to do some more testing on > Monday, but preliminary results look good. Thank you so m

Re: [Pdns-users] Differing (incorrect) behavior in 2.9.21 for AAAA records versus 2.9.20...

2007-08-11 Thread Augie Schwer
On 8/11/07, bert hubert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 09:51:24AM -0600, Michael Loftis wrote: > > The behavior for 's clearly differs from that for A's, so one just > > needs to see how A's are being handled and make sure 's are being > > handled similarly. (yes "jus

Re: [Pdns-users] Differing (incorrect) behavior in 2.9.21 for AAAA records versus 2.9.20...

2007-08-11 Thread bert hubert
On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 09:51:24AM -0600, Michael Loftis wrote: > The behavior for 's clearly differs from that for A's, so one just > needs to see how A's are being handled and make sure 's are being > handled similarly. (yes "just" heh. I haven't looked at teh new backend > code at a

Re: [Pdns-users] Differing (incorrect) behavior in 2.9.21 for AAAA records versus 2.9.20...

2007-08-11 Thread Michael Loftis
--On August 11, 2007 5:55:51 AM -0700 Augie Schwer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I submitted a bug on this a while back: http://wiki.powerdns.com/cgi-bin/trac.fcgi/ticket/125 And have been most recently lobbying (annoyingly at this point probably) for a fix, but demand drives change, and ther

Re: [Pdns-users] Differing (incorrect) behavior in 2.9.21 for AAAA records versus 2.9.20...

2007-08-11 Thread bert hubert
On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 03:02:06PM +0200, bert hubert wrote: > The place to fix this is in the packethandler.cc, and not in the backend. > CNAME wildcards are complicated beasts and complicate the packethandler - > you could probably tweak that code to do what you want easily enough, but > you migh

Re: [Pdns-users] Differing (incorrect) behavior in 2.9.21 for AAAA records versus 2.9.20...

2007-08-11 Thread bert hubert
On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 05:55:51AM -0700, Augie Schwer wrote: > vote for a fix is to put a "me too" entry on the open ticket; that or > fix it yourself, which I think is easier said then done as most likely > the bug is in the DB backend code as it seems to be too greedy in what > it grabs. The pl

Re: [Pdns-users] Differing (incorrect) behavior in 2.9.21 for AAAA records versus 2.9.20...

2007-08-11 Thread Augie Schwer
On 8/11/07, Michael Loftis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In the presence of a *.domain.com CNAME, 2.9.21, when asked for a more > specific A record responds appropriately with the A record when an A record > exists, and NOERROR/no answer for an MX or whatever. However, when asked > for an reco

[Pdns-users] Differing (incorrect) behavior in 2.9.21 for AAAA records versus 2.9.20...

2007-08-11 Thread Michael Loftis
In the presence of a *.domain.com CNAME, 2.9.21, when asked for a more specific A record responds appropriately with the A record when an A record exists, and NOERROR/no answer for an MX or whatever. However, when asked for an record, it will respond with the splat/*.domain.com CNAME inst