Re: [Pdns-users] PDNS Recursor domain not resolved!

2016-07-11 Thread Federico Olivieri
Ok, works fine with pdns 4.0.0.1! Great! Federico 2016-07-11 8:08 GMT+01:00 Pieter Lexis : > Hi Federico, > > On Sun, 10 Jul 2016 21:39:11 +0100 > Federico Olivieri wrote: > > > Sorry for the missed information. I'm using

Re: [Pdns-users] [Pdns-announce] PowerDNS Authoritative Server 4.0.0 released

2016-07-11 Thread Keresztes Péter-Zoltán
Hello, Does GeoIP backend work with mysql backend on pdns authoritative 4.0.0? I know old release did not supported the two together. Regards, Peter > On 11 Jul 2016, at 20:32, Michael Ströder wrote: > >> ived and supported LDAP

Re: [Pdns-users] [Pdns-announce] PowerDNS Authoritative Server 4.0.0 released

2016-07-11 Thread Michael Ströder
Pieter Lexis wrote: > * A revived and supported LDAP backend (ldap). Thanks! :-) CIao, Michael. smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature ___ Pdns-users mailing list Pdns-users@mailman.powerdns.com

Re: [Pdns-users] PowerDNS Recursor 4.0.0 for i386 Architecture?

2016-07-11 Thread Pieter Lexis
Hi Scott, On Mon, 11 Jul 2016 12:15:19 -0400 "Scott Hollenbeck" wrote: > Are there any plans for i386 support? There are currently no plans to create i386 packages, as that is an architecture that is fading in popularity and an earlier survey of repositories

[Pdns-users] PowerDNS Recursor 4.0.0 for i386 Architecture?

2016-07-11 Thread Scott Hollenbeck
I just installed PowerDNS Recursor 4.0.0 on an amd64 server and all went well. I also have an i386 server and it looks like the repository isn't set up to support that architecture - all I see in https://repo.powerdns.com/ubuntu/dists/trusty-rec-40/main/ is a folder names binary-amd64. Are there

[Pdns-users] PowerDNS Recursor 4.0.0 released

2016-07-11 Thread Pieter Lexis
Hello everybody, We are pleased to announce the availability of the PowerDNS Recursor 4.0.0. As announced, the Recursor was part of the great PowerDNS 4.x Spring Cleaning. And it was indeed kind of grand. More about the 4.0.0 release process can be found on our blog[1]. We changed many things

[Pdns-users] Welcome to PowerDNS 4.0.0!

2016-07-11 Thread bert hubert
(if your mail environment does not format this post correctly, please try: http://blog.powerdns.com/2016/07/11/welcome-to-powerdns-4-0-0 ) Welcome to PowerDNS 4.0.0! Today a rather epic journey ends. In this post, we describe how

Re: [Pdns-users] Problem with powerdns

2016-07-11 Thread bert hubert
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 10:38:13AM +, Jordan Cook wrote: > On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 11:25:05AM +, Aki Tuomi wrote: > > > >Try pdnsutil check-zone > > > >Aki > > Nope, nothing for the records with problems :( Jordan, Try pdnsutil check-all-zones. If that doesn't show us anything

Re: [Pdns-users] Problem with powerdns

2016-07-11 Thread Jordan Cook
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 11:25:05AM +, Aki Tuomi wrote: > >Try pdnsutil check-zone > >Aki Nope, nothing for the records with problems :( Gyron Internet Ltd. Jordan Cook Junior Network and Systems Engineer Network and Infrastructure P: +44 844 826 4000 | F: +44 844 826 4001 | M: +44 7703 739

Re: [Pdns-users] Problem with powerdns

2016-07-11 Thread Aki Tuomi
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 10:21:03AM +, Jordan Cook wrote: > Hello, > > I'm running PowerDNS Authoritative Server 4.0.0-alpha2 and we have a few > problems. > > We're seing lots of these errors in logs: > > Jul 11 11:18:04 ns01 pdns[31603]: Exception: All data was not consumed > Jul 11

[Pdns-users] Problem with powerdns

2016-07-11 Thread Jordan Cook
Hello, I'm running PowerDNS Authoritative Server 4.0.0-alpha2 and we have a few problems. We're seing lots of these errors in logs: Jul 11 11:18:04 ns01 pdns[31603]: Exception: All data was not consumed Jul 11 11:18:04 ns01 pdns[31603]: Exception building answer packet (All data was not

Re: [Pdns-users] PDNS Recursor domain not resolved!

2016-07-11 Thread Pieter Lexis
Hi Federico, On Sun, 10 Jul 2016 21:39:11 +0100 Federico Olivieri wrote: > Sorry for the missed information. I'm using 0.0.946g76d75e3-1pdns.jessie on > Raspbian. I' ll try to collect come some logs and I'll come back to you. In > the meantime would be nice have 4.0 forked