zone "ancientmariner.com" needs NS record for the "rime" zone:
rime.ancientmariner.com IN NS ns1.ancientmariner.com.
rime.ancientmariner.com IN NS ns2.ancientmariner.com.
___
Pdns-users mailing list
Pdns-users@mailman.powerdns.com
You probably don't want to insert 79,228,162,514,264,337,593,543,950,336
rows into your database for your ipv6 /32.
On Wed, Feb 1, 2023 at 7:28 AM VinÃcius Dalcin via Pdns-users <
pdns-users@mailman.powerdns.com> wrote:
> I'm going to install a database manager, because via pdnsutils I'm not
>
On the same machine, or sharing the same IP address? If sharing the same IP
you would have to do something like that. Otherwise if you have multiple
IPs on the machine you could bind each to a different IP / hostname.
Generally one would think it's best to not have the same IP respond to
On Fri, Nov 18, 2022 at 7:55 AM Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming via
Pdns-users wrote:
> Subject: What are the differences between PowerDNS Authoritative
> Server and Recursor?
>
> Good day from Singapore,
>
> May I know what are the differences between PowerDNS Authoritative
> Server and
We use the API to do this. Wouldn't that work regardless of which backend
is being used?
For IPv6, you could break your zone up at some nibble boundaries (/56) and
have zones. We're using a /32 broken in to /48 zones and it's fine for us.
We're using python and this module -
You're using MySQL replication as well as autosecondary? Seems like it
should be one or the other. Generally zones would be NATIVE if using
sql replication.
Telnetting to tcp 53 isn't a test of much of anything, you probably
should use the `dig` command, perhaps:
dig @ example.com SOA
On Wed,
On Fri, Aug 27, 2021 at 12:13 PM labs--- via Pdns-users
wrote:
>
> Hi Remi,
>
> Am 27.08.21 um 17:47 schrieb Remi Gacogne via Pdns-users:
> > These packages, while technically not a released version, are
> > currently 1.6.0 plus three fixes [3][4][5], so it should be pretty
> > safe to run in
On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 9:55 AM Chris Wopat wrote:
>
> 3) We're secondary-only to a primary server we don't manage. In our
> current situation, legacy servers adns1/adns2 perform the AXFR. In the
> new scenario, we want this to be hidden master ns0 and NOT ns1/ns2,
> because of database read
Hi folks,
I'm working on a project standing up new DNS servers using PowerDNS
instead of bind. Various reasons to switch, but more or less this
seems a lot more operator friendly with API and whatnot.
Anyhow, the 'legacy' system has 3 servers - adns0, adns1, adns2. 0 is
hidden master and is
