We at Sonic.net have been running PowerDNS authoritative server and
recursor since 2007 over some 12k+ domains.
Bert and the PowerDNS community have always been very responsive to
questions and assistance.
Before we migrated we captured and replayed some traffic from our then
production BIND name
On 08/16/2011 09:42 PM, Erik Weber wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 8:29 PM, Anthony Eden wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 8:23 PM, Posner, Sebastian
>> wrote:
>>> Erik Weber wrote:
> Some other things to consider why running PDNS is better:
>>> [...]
Just shooting in with a feature tha
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 01:29:18PM -0600, Michael Loftis wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 1:38 AM, Chris Russell
> wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> >
> >
> > Quick question – is anyone on the list using PDNS in an ISP environment,
> > especially for auth services ?
>
>
> There have definitely been a few
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 8:29 PM, Anthony Eden wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 8:23 PM, Posner, Sebastian
> wrote:
>>
>> Erik Weber wrote:
>> > > Some other things to consider why running PDNS is better:
>> [...]
>> > Just shooting in with a feature that I just came to remember.
>> >
>> > 6) Fanc
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 1:38 AM, Chris Russell
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
>
>
> Quick question – is anyone on the list using PDNS in an ISP environment,
> especially for auth services ?
Up until a couple years ago I worked as Sr. SA/Ops Manager at Modwest,
we used PowerDNS then, and they still do today.
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 8:23 PM, Posner, Sebastian wrote:
> Erik Weber wrote:
> > > Some other things to consider why running PDNS is better:
> [...]
> > Just shooting in with a feature that I just came to remember.
> >
> > 6) Fancy records.
>
> 3.0 doesn't support fancy records any more.
>
I, fo
Erik Weber wrote:
> > Some other things to consider why running PDNS is better:
[...]
> Just shooting in with a feature that I just came to remember.
>
> 6) Fancy records.
3.0 doesn't support fancy records any more.
http://doc.powerdns.com/fancy-records.html
Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
Sebastian
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 7:00 PM, Brielle Bruns wrote:
> Some other things to consider why running PDNS is better:
>
> 1) BIND is agonizingly slow when loading lots of zones. Only recently have
> they bothered to work on that so it doesn't take 6 hours to load a ton of
> domains.
>
> 2) Auth and c
> Hi Bert,
>
> > The best I can do is refer to this thread, which lists some data
> points: http://mailman.powerdns.com/pipermail/pdns-users/2011-
> May/007719.html
>
> Cheers, that's a good start :)
>
> > Measuring the 'company domain name' with fpdns is of limited utility
> - the company doma
On 8/16/11 1:50 AM, bert hubert wrote:
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 08:38:07AM +0100, Chris Russell wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Quick question - is anyone on the list using PDNS in an ISP environment,
especially for auth services ?
The best I can do is refer to this thread, which lists some data points:
On 08/16/2011 10:05 AM, Chris Russell wrote:
Hi Bert,
The best I can do is refer to this thread, which lists some data points:
http://mailman.powerdns.com/pipermail/pdns-users/2011-May/007719.html
[cut]
Hello,
i work in an isp and we're using pdns as auth server, we have about 4000
domains
> fraction of the resources and a magniture more of the speed and
> reliability. So far I don't really remember any real problems in any
> of those.
Cheers Peter, much appreciated. I've no real concerns over the ipv6 stability,
we participated in wipv6day and I pushed some of our domains over to
> We're an ISP utilizing PowerDNS, although small scale if you compare us to
> others/other countries (~2000 domains).
Near where we are, we're more a services company but we've grown into the ISP.
Being able to host DNS helps us with we come to things like migrations.
> The MySQL backend mak
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 08:38:07AM +0100, Chris Russell wrote:
> [root@ns1 ~]# fpdns -D plus.net
> fingerprint (plus.net, 195.166.128.16): ISC BIND 9.2.3rc1 -- 9.4.0a4
> fingerprint (plus.net, 195.166.128.17): ISC BIND 9.2.3rc1 -- 9.4.0a4
We do intend to move to PowerDNS for our authoritative serv
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 10:05 AM, Chris Russell
wrote:
> Hi Bert,
>
>> The best I can do is refer to this thread, which lists some data points:
>> http://mailman.powerdns.com/pipermail/pdns-users/2011-May/007719.html
>
> Cheers, that's a good start :)
We're an ISP utilizing PowerDNS, although s
Hi Bert,
> The best I can do is refer to this thread, which lists some data points:
> http://mailman.powerdns.com/pipermail/pdns-users/2011-May/007719.html
Cheers, that's a good start :)
> Measuring the 'company domain name' with fpdns is of limited utility - the
> company domain name itself
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 08:38:07AM +0100, Chris Russell wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Quick question - is anyone on the list using PDNS in an ISP environment,
> especially for auth services ?
The best I can do is refer to this thread, which lists some data points:
http://mailman.powerdns.com/pipermail/pd
Hi All,
Quick question - is anyone on the list using PDNS in an ISP environment,
especially for auth services ?
Have prepped PDNS to replace our Bind instances however management have raised
concerns over moving away from the "industry standard", so have asked for more
justification on the cha
18 matches
Mail list logo
