[pdt-dev] Shaving of keystrokes: extension points?

§ 1. Is the documentation on pdt extension points outdated? -- I tried to implement the sample Code assist strategy [1]. I have the following observations: 1. The code contains an error (XYZCompletionContext contains superfl

[pdt-dev] Oxygen plan 5.0 or 4.4 ?

Hi Team, sooner or later we should annouce PDT particpation in Oxygen (Eclipse 4.7). How about 5.0? This allow us to cleanup API after composer merge. -- Dawid Pakuła ___ pdt-dev mailing list pdt-dev@eclipse.org To change your delivery options, retrie

Re: [pdt-dev] Oxygen plan 5.0 or 4.4 ?

Sounds good. Kaloyan From: pdt-dev-boun...@eclipse.org on behalf of Dawid Pakuła Sent: Tuesday, August 9, 2016 2:57:52 PM To: PDT Developers Subject: [pdt-dev] Oxygen plan 5.0 or 4.4 ? Hi Team, sooner or later we should annouce PDT particpation in Oxygen (Ec

[pdt-dev] Oxygen plan 5.0 or 4.4 ?

+1 for 5.0, we still have many many things to clean [😉] Michal Od: pdt-dev-boun...@eclipse.org w imieniu użytkownika Kaloyan Raev Wysłane: 9 sierpnia 2016 13:58 Do: PDT Developers Temat: Re: [pdt-dev] Oxygen plan 5.0 or 4.4 ? Sounds good. Kaloyan

Re: [pdt-dev] Oxygen plan 5.0 or 4.4 ?

+1 for 5.0 On 8/9/2016 2:00 PM, Michal Niewrzal wrote: +1 for 5.0, we still have many many things to clean [😉] Michal Od: pdt-dev-boun...@eclipse.org w imieniu użytkownika Kaloyan Raev <

Re: [pdt-dev] Shaving of keystrokes: extension points?

Hi, my answer below. -- Dawid Pakuła From: Eenhuis Reply: PDT Developers Date: 9 August 2016 at 10:22:11 To: pdt-dev Subject: [pdt-dev] Shaving of keystrokes: extension points? § 1. Is the documentation on pdt extension points outdated? AD: Yes ;(

Re: [pdt-dev] Shaving of keystrokes: extension points?

In the example from the wiki [1], the isValid method never gets called for ones own CompletionContext, I tested it with setting breakpoints on it: public class XYZCompletionContext extends ClassMemberContext { public boolean isValid(ISourceModule sourceModule, int offset, CompletionRe

Re: [pdt-dev] Shaving of keystrokes: extension points?

REFORMATTED In the example from the wiki [1], the isValid method never gets called for ones own CompletionContext, I tested it with setting breakpoints on it: public class XYZCompletionContext extends ClassMemberContext {     public boolean isValid(ISourceModule sourceModule, in

Re: [pdt-dev] Shaving of keystrokes: extension points?

Thanks I will check that out! > From: zu...@w3des.net > Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2016 08:35:29 -0400 > To: pdt-dev@eclipse.org > Subject: Re: [pdt-dev] Shaving of keystrokes: extension points? > > Hi, > > my answer below. > > -- > Dawid Pakuła > > From: Eenhuis

[pdt-dev] State of eclipse plugin development, any thoughts?

I try to develop some additional functionality for eclipse pdt, as you can see in my previous thread [1]. I have spent quite some time figuring out where to find the SSE autoedit extension point. Fact is, it doesn exist as such, but digging around the internet revealed there is a provisionalCon

Re: [pdt-dev] State of eclipse plugin development, any thoughts?

Hi, current state is a nightmare :( I’m talking from PDT developer state, and also as PDT Extensions developer/maintainer. On each release we improve quality of extension points and utils, but they still aren’t developer friendly. But looks better than 3 years ago ;) [0] For now, best place to se

Re: [pdt-dev] State of eclipse plugin development, any thoughts?

Hi, I'm not PDT developer, but I'm watching development of the PDT and projects based on this great Plugins really long time, years. I think, that the best start would be to look at some other project's source code, which is successfully based on PDT or is extending PDT. Really good example is htt

Re: [pdt-dev] Composer contribution

Hey guys, I won't be of any help at the moment, as I'm writing my diploma thesis. If there is something I need to do, please let me know. Anyway, a huge thanks to you guys for moving this forward and giving it some love :) gossi Am 08.08.16 um 12:26 schrieb Michal Niewrzal: Thanks for inf

Re: [pdt-dev] Oxygen plan 5.0 or 4.4 ?

+1 for 5.0 Still many things to do ;) From: bartlomie...@zend.com To: pdt-dev@eclipse.org Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2016 12:13:06 + Subject: Re: [pdt-dev] Oxygen plan 5.0 or 4.4 ? +1 for 5.0 On 8/9/2016 2:00 PM, Michal Niewrzal wrote: +1 for 5.0, we still have many many things to clean