Re: [PECL-DEV] Extension proposal: hrtime

2014-04-16 Thread Anatol Belski
On Mon, 2014-04-07 at 08:49 +0200, Anatol Belski wrote: > On Mon, April 7, 2014 00:57, Chung Leong wrote: > > Doesn't the win32 implementation of gettimeofday() already use the > > performance timer? > > > > > > On Sun, Apr 6, 2014 at 3:52 PM, Anatol Belski > > wrote: > > > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> >

Re: [PECL-DEV] Extension proposal: hrtime

2014-04-06 Thread Anatol Belski
On Mon, April 7, 2014 00:57, Chung Leong wrote: > Doesn't the win32 implementation of gettimeofday() already use the > performance timer? > > > On Sun, Apr 6, 2014 at 3:52 PM, Anatol Belski > wrote: > > >> Hi, >> >> >> I would like to propose the extension implementing a high resolution >> StopWat

Re: [PECL-DEV] Extension proposal: hrtime

2014-04-06 Thread Chung Leong
Doesn't the win32 implementation of gettimeofday() already use the performance timer? On Sun, Apr 6, 2014 at 3:52 PM, Anatol Belski wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to propose the extension implementing a high resolution > StopWatch class. It also makes possible to implement a custom stopwatch > u

[PECL-DEV] Extension proposal: hrtime

2014-04-06 Thread Anatol Belski
Hi, I would like to propose the extension implementing a high resolution StopWatch class. It also makes possible to implement a custom stopwatch using the almost low level ticks delivered by the underlaying APIs. The extension does NOT implement high resolution timestamps synchronizable to an exte