On Mon, 2014-04-07 at 08:49 +0200, Anatol Belski wrote:
> On Mon, April 7, 2014 00:57, Chung Leong wrote:
> > Doesn't the win32 implementation of gettimeofday() already use the
> > performance timer?
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Apr 6, 2014 at 3:52 PM, Anatol Belski
> > wrote:
> >
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >>
>
On Mon, April 7, 2014 00:57, Chung Leong wrote:
> Doesn't the win32 implementation of gettimeofday() already use the
> performance timer?
>
>
> On Sun, Apr 6, 2014 at 3:52 PM, Anatol Belski
> wrote:
>
>
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>> I would like to propose the extension implementing a high resolution
>> StopWat
Doesn't the win32 implementation of gettimeofday() already use the
performance timer?
On Sun, Apr 6, 2014 at 3:52 PM, Anatol Belski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to propose the extension implementing a high resolution
> StopWatch class. It also makes possible to implement a custom stopwatch
> u
Hi,
I would like to propose the extension implementing a high resolution
StopWatch class. It also makes possible to implement a custom stopwatch
using the almost low level ticks delivered by the underlaying APIs. The
extension does NOT implement high resolution timestamps synchronizable to
an exte