Re: Fwd: Re: [PEIRCE-L] [biosemiotics:6231] Re: biosemiotics is the basis for

2014-08-13 Thread Sungchul Ji
Gary R, Gary F, list, From my cherry-picking readings in the orchard of Peirce, I gathered the impression that Every phenomenon has three aspects he called (081314-1) Firstness, Secondness and Thirdness. If this impression of mine is true, why can't phaneron itself have these

RE: Fwd: Re: [PEIRCE-L] [biosemiotics:6231] Re: biosemiotics is the basis for

2014-08-13 Thread Gary Fuhrman
Gary, GR: I would maintain that, and apart from analysis, in our phenomenological experience those several qualities are felt as distinct. GF: I would agree with that. They are felt as distinct when the analysis is not under conscious control, as the percept itself is not.

Re: Fwd: Re: [PEIRCE-L] [biosemiotics:6231] Re: biosemiotics is the basis for

2014-08-13 Thread Gary Richmond
Gary, all, Gary F. wrote: But phaneroscopy is looking for the elements of the phaneron, not the elements of experience, and certainly not the elements of *human* experience only. I can well believe that the only way to do this scientifically (i.e. communally) is by way of iconoscopy, or