Re: [PEIRCE-L] Terms, Propositions, Arguments

> On Nov 20, 2015, at 12:50 PM, John Collier wrote: > > I think it is questionable whether Chomsky was really a rationalist, since > he, like Pinker, often spoke of syntax as something that evolved, and > therefore contingent. Mark Bickhard has argued that given a rich

[PEIRCE-L] Re: Terms, Propositions, Arguments

Forgetfulness Of Purpose http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/17230 http://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2015/10/12/forgetfulness-of-purpose-%E2%80%A2-8/ Terms, Propositions, Arguments ==

Re: [PEIRCE-L] Terms, Propositions, Arguments

Jeff, This is a long one. I am combining my response to your two latest substantive posts, including some revision of my response to the first of the two. First of all, thank you for the list of references; they are much appreciated. I've ended up reading Telepathy (well, what's in CP anyway,