Thanks for clearing that up for us, Jerry.
Gary f.
From: Jerry Rhee [mailto:jerryr...@gmail.com]
Sent: 25-May-16 13:18
Gary F and list,
I fail to see why you picked out that portion of the quote. So, if the
logician looks to the ethicist for the aims of action... the ethicist
Gary F and list,
I fail to see why you picked out that portion of the quote. So, if the
logician looks to the ethicist for the aims of action... the ethicist does
what?
There is a subtle but *huge* difference between ascertaining what ends are
possible, which is the business of ethics,
and
Thanks, Jerry C.
Shook has posted his paper at:
https://www.academia.edu/25176618/2016_Shook_-_Abduction_Complex_Inferences_and_Emergent_Heuristics_of_Scientific_Inquiry
*On 5/25/2016 12:51 PM, Jerry LR Chandler wrote:*
List
In view of the the extended discussion of abduction, I thought the
List
In view of the the extended discussion of abduction, I thought the following
article may be of interest:
Axiomathes (2016) 26:157–186 DOI 10.1007/s10516-015-9282-y
ORIGINAL PAPER
Abduction, Complex Inferences, and Emergent Heuristics of Scientific Inquiry
John R. Shook1
It generates a
Jon,
[[ Selecting the means to achieve a taken-for-granted end is the common
perception of what engineering is all about--techne and poiesis. However, I
have argued elsewhere that it is more properly viewed as the exercise of
context-sensitive judgment--phronesis and praxis. ]]
OK. But
