What’s so puzzling about the question:
*Is CP 5.189 Peirce’s lanterna pedibus? *
It either is or isn’t…or it is, because there’s no other better.
For instance, is it better than contrite fallibilism combined with his
convergence theory of truth? Why?
*What determines it?*
In other
*Preface to Leaves of Grass*
by Walt Whitman
Stephen,
I very good & most relevant quote you provided.
Kirsti
Stephen C. Rose kirjoitti 3.7.2016 15:00:
The reasoning of Triadic Philosophy works in all contexts. This is a
remarkable claim in a world where the barriers between disciplines
grow higher and it is hard to have discussions
