Gary,
List,
I am certainly overwhelmed and lost in translation so have mercy on me, simply
try to find this merely amusing but how taking into account "revelation" or
"miracles"
"how is it that the results of science are more reliable than what is provided
by these other forms?"
Imho s
Gary R, list:
I shouldn’t simply be flip.
I should try to figure out what Gary R’s intention was in forwarding that
article.
The question of “What is…” the scientific method is an old one.
There aren’t any novel observations in that nytimes article to warrant
taking the author any more se
Gary, list:
you said: "It is not scientists who are trained specifically to provide
analyses of scientific method."
It may not solely be philosophers, either.
Best,
Jerry R
On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 2:55 PM, Gary Richmond
wrote:
> List,
>
> I found this very short provocative essay of interest.
List,
I found this very short provocative essay of interest.
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/04/opinion/there-is-no-scientific-method.html?ref=opinion
The author's conclusion:
If scientific method is only one form of a general method employed in all
human inquiry, how is it that the results of sc
CLARK GOBLE kirjoitti 4.7.2016 07:53:
On Jul 2, 2016, at 5:58 AM, kirst...@saunalahti.fi wrote:
KiM: It seems to me you evade Jerry's question, Clark. A very sensible
question to me, well worth an answer to the question, not just beside
it.
CG: I’m not sure I was evading it so much as expla
Call for Submissions:
The 2016-2017 Charles S. Peirce Society Essay Contest
Topic: Any topic on or related to the work of Charles Sanders Peirce.
Awards: $500 cash prize; presentation at the Society's next annual meeting,
held in conjunction with the Eastern APA (in Baltimore, MD, USA, Jan. 4-7,
