Dear Eugene, Gary, list:
Thank you for your contributions.
In the passages given, Moore uses “religion” like Gary uses “science”; not
as true religion and science but “dogmatic religion” and “didactic
science”- something incomplete to be held up against some other higher to
emphasize a low
Dear Gary,
Thanks for your comments. Yes, I agree with your diagramming,
that if Lawrence’s statement could fit Peirce’s triad it would look
something like that. But Lawrence tends to treat power and love more as
contraries rather than modes of being. Still, yes, I think his idea that
Jon Alan,
I fully agree!!!
Kirsti
Jon Alan Schmidt kirjoitti 20.7.2016 04:15:
Stefan, List:
You wrote ...
It would be much better to teach practicing scientists the
philosophy, history and sociology of science. This would be
enlightenment in science...
The same is true for engineers and
