Stefan, the questions you ask for data and methodology are
natural and understandable in terms of Peirce's abiding guidance
on the scientific method and fallibility. Edwina, the evidence
you offer is the best available given our current state of
Edwina,
oh, this is a Peirce list, that's interesting, isn't it? What kind of red
hering is this? You keep writing this stuff on this list for years over and
over again. Now, when someone asks you for some evidence of your "theory" you
say you can't provide it because this is a Peirce list?
On 11/19/2016 6:14 PM, Edwina Taborsky wrote:
I don't think that democracy 'is human destiny', and I don't
believe that we are moving 'in the direction of goodness'.
I agree. Just look at history.
Greece and Rome had democracies. But both of those democracies were
toppled by tyrants (AKA
Stefan - I can't deal with your questions on this list, as it is a site devoted
to Peirce - and Peirce has nothing to do with ecological analysis of societal
adaptation.
i may deal with it off-list - but your questions are, to me, rather strange,
for you seem to be approaching societal
Edwina,
where can we find these descriptive data? Did you use archival data? Did you do
any fieldwork? Has it been published? What sources do you draw on? How did you
conduct your qualitative research? What hypotheses guided your qualitative
research? Have documented how you get to your
I don't know what Peirce thought about this, but I see democracy as an
ontological term that covers all governance and is the standard by which
all goverance should be evaluated. I do not believe it relates to size of
population or other demographic benchmarks. It has to do with the rights of
the
Stephen, List:
I would suggest that democracy IS majority rule, and thus that the United
States is NOT a democracy. Instead, it is a republic; in particular, a
federal republic, with numerous checks and balances intended to prevent the
concentration of power in any one person or
Stephan - Of course a democracy - and all modes of political operation - are
carried out within some form of legal legitimization or constitution [written
or oral].
And you are quite right to caution, strongly caution, against 'simple
democracy' [see Aristotle's comments on this in his
Edwina, List
To take only one point, I emphatically hold that democracy is much more
than majority rule. We have just had an election which we would have to
denote undemocratic if that was the case. As a polity I favor a
constitutional democracy such as the we we have in the US. In addition to
Stefan - the analysis is based on descriptive data of the ecological
anthropological analyses of various socioeconomic peoples - hunting/gathering;
the different types of agriculturalism - wet and dry horticulture, pastoral
nomadic, rainfall agriculture...and early and late industrialism. It
Stefan, Edwina, list:
Great questions!
Yes, Edwina, what is the icon, the index and the symbol?
Best,
Jerry R
On Sat, Nov 19, 2016 at 5:35 PM, sb wrote:
> Edwina,
>
> i would be really interested how you tackled such a complex theoretical
> concept empirically.
>
>
Stephen, list: I don't think that democracy 'is human destiny', and I don't
believe that we are moving 'in the direction of goodness'. Perhaps that's my
cynicism but i don't think that man gets kinder, better as the centuries pass.
I think our basic emotional psychological natures preclude
Yes - I've taught this relationship between economics, population size and
political infrastructure for about 20 years. No- it's not really in the
Architectonics book. It IS in a graphic book, The Graphic Guide to
Socioeconomics - which a retired CEO banker and myself have just finished
I derive from my sense of Peirce and my own thinking that democracy is a
scalable and universal polity, that it contains other values essential to
the promulgation of goodness, truth and beauty, and that any effort to see
it as valid only at certain scales or under certain conditions is as futile
Edwina, list,
You've clearly given this a lot of prior thought, Edwina. I want to reflect
on wht you wrote and see what others think before commenting further. Btw,
would looking again at your book, *Architectonics of Semiosis*, for
example, Chapter 2, "Purity and Power," be of any value in this
Gary R- that's an interesting topic.
1) I'd like to first comment that democracy, as a political system for arriving
at authoritative government decisions, is the 'right' method but ONLY in a very
large population with a growth economy and a growth population. That is,
political systems have
Dear Gary, list:
You said:
Meanwhile, can anyone on the list offer some Peirce quotations which might
help quickly clarify his views on democracy?
Here is one…or two…or perhaps three:
“The best republic is the ideally perfect, the second the best on earth,
the third the best *ex
List,
I read Robert B. Talisse's *A Pragmatist Philosophy of Democracy* (2007) a
few year ago and was thinking of it again today, in part prompted by an
op-ed piece in *The New York Times* by Roger Cohen which quotes H. L.
Mencken (see below). At the time of my reading PPD, I was not at all
Peircers,
Movin' kinda slow, but I did get a decently formatted copy
of that first excerpt from Kelley's Topology up on my blog:
Time, Topology, Differential Logic • 5
https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2016/11/19/time-topology-differential-logic-%e2%80%a2-5/
I've also posted slightly improved
19 matches
Mail list logo