Re: [PEIRCE-L] Re: { Information = Comprehension × Extension }

2017-06-27 Thread Jerry Rhee
John, list: On 6/27/2017 6:08 PM, Jerry Rhee wrote: > Thanks for making what might otherwise appear confusing and complex, clear > and simple. Not I, but Gary said the above I saw what you were doing... explaining by means of itself. best, J On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 10:19 PM, John F Sowa

Re: [PEIRCE-L] Re: { Information = Comprehension × Extension }

2017-06-27 Thread John F Sowa
On 6/27/2017 6:08 PM, Jerry Rhee wrote: Thanks for making what might otherwise appear confusing and complex, clear and simple. I hope I didn't make it too clear and simple -- because I agree with Peirce (and with modern lexicographers) that word senses are definitely not clear and simple. I

Re: [PEIRCE-L] Re: { Information = Comprehension × Extension }

2017-06-27 Thread Jerry Rhee
John, list: yeah, that was a great post! J On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 4:34 PM, Gary Richmond wrote: > John, > > Thanks for making what might otherwise appear confusing and complex, clear > and simple. > > Best, > > Gary R > > [image: Gary Richmond] > > *Gary Richmond* >

Re: [PEIRCE-L] Re: { Information = Comprehension × Extension }

2017-06-27 Thread Gary Richmond
John, Thanks for making what might otherwise appear confusing and complex, clear and simple. Best, Gary R [image: Gary Richmond] *Gary Richmond* *Philosophy and Critical Thinking* *Communication Studies* *LaGuardia College of the City University of New York* *C 745* *718 482-5690* On Tue,

Re: [PEIRCE-L] Re: { Information = Comprehension × Extension }

2017-06-27 Thread John F Sowa
Jon, The subject line raises some complex issues: Information = Comprehension × Extension A more fundamental term is 'proposition', which is informally defined as the "meaning" of a sentence. That meaning is usually analyzed as comprehension (AKA intension) and extension. Given that

[PEIRCE-L] Re: { Information = Comprehension × Extension }

2017-06-27 Thread Jon Awbrey
Peircers, Here's my 1st Comment on Selections 1 through 6 — { Information = Comprehension × Extension } • Comment 1 === https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2016/05/26/information-comprehension-x-extension-%e2%80%a2-comment-1/ At this point in his

Re: [PEIRCE-L] Re: C.S. Peirce • Logic As Semiotic

2017-06-27 Thread John F Sowa
On 6/25/2017 5:28 PM, Edwina Taborsky wrote: interesting outline - and I'd need to spend a lot more time on it. I realize that 112 slides are a bit much to digest. So I deleted 93 slides to create a short version (title page + 18 slides): http://www.jfsowa.com/talks/vrshort.pdf In the short

Aw: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: RE: [PEIRCE-L] RE: AI

2017-06-27 Thread Helmut Raulien
    Supplement: Edwina, I think I just argued from your point, or twisted the words. sorry. I think, our opinions are not far apart, generally: When people do not admit that they are arguing or politically acting out of secondness, but make their point seem like thirdness though it isnt, then