[PEIRCE-L] Concerning the issue of email from Sdh. Sng.

Gary F, John S, list, Ben Udell and I have addressed this issue in the past and will do so again shortly in some greater detail. At the moment I am dealing with a death in my family and will be traveling from NYC to Florida soon, so I haven't time just now to say much; and Ben is a bit under the

Re: [PEIRCE-L] [Sadhu Sanga] Re: Is relativity theory holding back progress in science?

> On Jul 20, 2017, at 6:24 AM, John F Sowa wrote: > > I have been following new developments in physics for many years, > and I am also interested in Peirce's views on the subject. But I > agree with the summary below by Kashyap V Vasavada. > > I would prefer not to have

RE: [PEIRCE-L] RE: [Sadhu Sanga] Re: Is relativity theory holding back progress in science?

I'd like to second John Sowa's suggestion that the cc or bcc of Sadhu Sanga posts to Peirce-L should stop — not because the study of physics is irrelevant to the study of semiotics, but because these posts have not been relevant to the study of semiotics or of Peirce. Gary f. -Original

RE: [PEIRCE-L] RE: [Sadhu Sanga] Re: Is relativity theory holding back progress in science?

>"I would prefer not to have these emails stuff my folder for Peirce-L. Unless >other Peirce-L subscribers want to read these notes, I suggest that the cc or >bcc to Peirce-L should stop." Before anyone dismisses the study of physics as irrelevant to the study of semiotics, might I suggest

Re: [PEIRCE-L] RE: [Sadhu Sanga] Re: Is relativity theory holding back progress in science?

I have been following new developments in physics for many years, and I am also interested in Peirce's views on the subject. But I agree with the summary below by Kashyap V Vasavada. I would prefer not to have these emails stuff my folder for Peirce-L. Unless other Peirce-L subscribers want to