Re: [PEIRCE-L] Philosophy of Existential Graphs (was Peirce's best and final version of EGs)

2020-08-11 Thread John F. Sowa
Jon A, Helmut R, Terry R, Jon AS, List, JA> I can't imagine why anyone would bother with Peirce's logic if it's just Frege and Russell in another syntax, which has been the opinion I usually get from FOL fans. That is true.  But the EG structure and rules of inference are elegant, and the

[PEIRCE-L] Re: Animated Logical Graphs

2020-08-11 Thread Jon Awbrey
Cf: Animated Logical Graphs • 34 http://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2020/08/11/animated-logical-graphs-34/ Re: Ontolog Forum ( https://groups.google.com/d/topic/ontolog-forum/7iwyulzDpFA/overview ) ::: John Sowa ( https://groups.google.com/d/msg/ontolog-forum/7iwyulzDpFA/dwlvIiMaBwAJ ) Re: Peirce

Aw: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Re: Philosophy of Existential Graphs (was Peirce's best and final version of EGs)

2020-08-11 Thread Helmut Raulien
  Jon, John, List,   I think that "implication, imagination, or belief" mostly do not sit in the symbols of notation such as cuts, but in the variables. Are they thoroughly cecked out premisses, or not? If the object does not affect the interpreter, they may be, then it is analysis, and the