Ben, I agree with your analysis, and I'd like to add a comment about
modal logic.
Consider the sentence "It might rain tomorrow,
and it might not." That sentence cannot be falsified because neither
side makes a firm promise.
But if you replace 'might' with 'will',
the following statement is
Helmut, List:
Indeed, that passage by Peirce in R 490 is challenging to untangle. I had
to read and reread it several times myself when I first studied it a few
months ago, and then again yesterday while drafting my previous post.
Both graphs are existential, not entitative. The only difference
Cf: Survey of Inquiry Driven Systems • 3
http://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2020/12/27/survey-of-inquiry-driven-systems-3/
All,
This updates my Survey ( http://inquiryintoinquiry.com/surveys/ )
of blog and wiki posts on “Inquiry Driven Systems”, repairing in
passing the welter of links broken due to
Jon, List,
Thank you! I need examples. This one is tricky, I have to read it some more times, as now I don´t see the asymmetry. And I don´t understand
"Nevertheless, these are different propositions that signify different states of things, which is reflected by their different existential
